Peter Klevius theory on human evolution celebrates >1 decade on the web and >2 decades in book form

Afrocentrism (i.e. misinfo on human evolution) is based on our pity for the devastation islam's* >1000yrs of enslavement, "religious" colonialism and genocides caused on African people

* Although there is not the slightest doubt about islam being against Human Rights and having been the worst slave raider/trader history knows about we are still bombarded with sleazy politically correct deceptive excuses of what is the very nature of islam's original genocidal terrorism/robbery/murdering/enslaving evilness. Yes, there was slavery before islam but only islam institutionalized slavery (incl. sex slavery) as its very ideological soul and finance. The root formula of islam is slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban and is the only explanation that fits both the text in the Koran and historical facts. The "peaceful islam" described by pc people and lying imams would never have won any battle or power. Islamic finance/reproduction was solely based on taking slaves. Talking Koranic Arabic, i.e. being muslim, was the religious excuse for taking "infidel" slaves, and actually the most important reason for muslim attacks against non-muslims or wrong-muslims. In Africa it started with smaller scale Jewish slave traders from southern Arabian peninsula but with the introduction of Arabic islam most of the African slave trade became Koranic.

However, this Afrocentrism also contributed to the heavy misinterpretation of evolution that has terribly skewed our understanding of what it is to be human.

From Africans seeing Westerners as gods to Africans seeing Westerners as evil, Africans now have to face the unavoidable fact that they have themselves become "Westerners". However, some Africans still try not to face the mirror and instead turn to the only really true evil, namely islam. Unlike the West's lack of any unified "moral lesson" to Africans, Saudi spread islam is deliberately evil when compared to the most basic Human Rights.

Not only is Saudi Arabia the by far worst environmental polluter per capita, its oil fueled islamic Wahhabism ideology (i.e. based on the origin of islam) is also the worst mind polluter and behind most street jihad globally, performed by 'lone muslim wolves' as well as organized muslim gangs.

And the fact that Human Rights don't approve of evil and hence may not be that attractive for evil personalities as islam is, should not be an excuse. The simple formula is that the more you embrace islam the more evil you become. It also explains why there are so many "nice muslims", i.e. "muslims" who out of ignorance or opportunism distance themselves from true islam while out of fear (apostasy is the worst crime in islam) or opportunism continue to call themselves "proud muslims".

What is a scientific theory?

Focus, presearch and conclusions are all vulnerable to bias/prejudice.

A scientific theory is a set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena. It ought to be formulated in such a way that falsification is in principle possible and that it can be used to make predictions. Not every detail of a scientific theory needs to be fully correct (compare Darwin's theory on evolution). A scientific theory is an idea that may be complex but still fits solid data and fills up the unknown/uncertainty between these data, and is suggested or presented as possibly true but not yet known or proven to be true. Later data may completely dismiss the main body of the theory or just slightly alter aspects of it without changing its foundation.


If you are able to be neutral and without prejudice against Klevius you don't need the embarrassing personal data about Klevius below. Just jump down to below the map to continue.

Acknowledgement: Correct him if he is wrong but Klevius seems to have been first* in the world (compare his discussion abt the extremely big brained 280,000 bp (at the least 260,000bp acc. to a Chinese expert but closer to some 200,000+ acc. to Westerners - yet older than any "modern" in Africa) female Jinniushan skull in northern China in his 1992 book) to seriously hypothize and later theorize the fact that cold adaptation (mongoloid features) has been found all over the world (except Australia and some surroundings) among native inhabitants, and that the racial mix and distribution can only be explained by turning the map upside down, i.e. modern humans spreading from the north to the south while interbreeding with archaic ones. Moreover, because we know that humans are more related to chimps than any other primates and that bipedal ape like hominin relatives to humans used to be pygmy sized and with brain capacities similar to or barely exceeding chimps, we also know that brain and body size grew in the north so that our closest relative, the Neanderthal man, had the biggest brain of all yet wasn't capable of anything near certain (northern) aspects of the so called Aurignacian culture (watch up for stretched definitions though). So something more than a big brain was necessary. Initially in 1992 Klevius thought the secret lied in the chimp/hominin hybridization in the jungle/savannah borders and due increase and decrease of size. However, with the discovery of Homo floresiensis in SE Asia it seemed much more likely that the changing island/mainland history there was a much better environment for human brain evolution. And when some of the small brained but clever floresiensis like creatures were freed from their island prisons by decreased sea level due to iceage (and possible changes in the volatile sea bottom over there) they started mixing with their dumb mainland relatives (erectus? - Red Deer Cave?) all the way up to the north (compare Denisovan). And because the western Eurasia was inhabited with Neanderthals and the eastern Eurasia with mongolized erectus, we then got the racial pattern we have today because of backmigration.



Today ALL serious anthropologists agree with Klevius that the simple out of Africa myth is completely misleading. It is against this background "scientists" like Chris Stringer shouldn't be taken seriously anymore - yet BBC uses him as their main commentator! Why? Because he is politically correct in his blindfolded and extremely biased fantasies. There is not the slightest evidence that what we define as humans came "out of Africa".  When should we see an African criticize Chris Stringer as the one who criticized Bob Geldof in Klevius previous posting?
* Klevius excuses for thinking he can use his brain in the service of human well being. Yes, it sounds pompostruos but is in fact just the opposite. However, precisely because of the easy way out dismissal strategy many biased people reveal when facing for them uncomfortable analysis, this embarassing self portraial seems necessary. Klevius just happens to tick three important boxes without being able to take personal credit for any of them:

1 One of the biggest well functioning brains in the world (need measurments, scans or transmittor stability?). When Klevius girlfriend tried to lure him into riding horses, he was saved by Finland's biggest riding accessory store's inability to deliver a helmet big enough despite a half bald thin haired skull. Moreover, Klevius skull bones are less robust than most Europeans, i.e. more like East Asians. Klevius scored highest among visitors at Munchen's technological museum on a reaction test. Klevius sister scored highest in IBM's talent hunt and Klevius father was Sweden's perhaps best chessplayer. Klevius uncles had both double degrees in economy and engineering and led two of Finland's biggest companies. When Klevius did the military IQ test in Sweden they didn't tell the scores but the psychologist (that everyone had to face) said 'whatever happens to you in your future life - don't try to blame it on your brain' - which was what he actually did by calling himself 'mentally impaired' e.g. when talking with ordinary people and trying to politely listen to the last sentence although he already got it in the first part of the first sentence (the smart ones among you readers certainly recognize this social "prob. Add to this Klevius upbringing and adult life in the world's most liberal and modern countries without religious or political restrictions/brainwashing. Despite having a lot of social engagement with both sexes no one has accused Klevius of anything even close to inappropriate. Klevius has never been accused of a crime, and the only way to do so seems to be to accuse him in accordance with sharia for defending everyone's Human Right. If this isn't enough for you please read everything Klevius has written. You won't find anything to criticize without using sharia. All in all, these points seem to add some creedence to the value of the thoughts Klevius produces, or...?

2  Because of a series of strange events outside Klevius own control he came not to follow a normal academic career. In fact, his forst contact with a professor was Georg Henrik von Wright (who succeeded Wittgenstein at Cambridge). von Wright's encouragment led to the publishing of Demand for Resources (1992). All in all, this a-academic yet highly theoretical approach of Klevius left him without academic bias. That's also why Klevius definition of science and its methodologies and methods lack the usual "amendments" used to open up for subjectivism/bias in favor of a particular but supposedly hidden agenda.

3  Being a bi-lingual (Swedish/Finnish) Finland Swede born in Sweden with a Finnish mother (Helsinki) and Swedish father (Gothenburg) Klevius had no problem to be a non-socialist a-theist in accordance with what his intelligence saw as the only possible way of building a morality that covered every human being, hence excluding racism and sexism.

Some common abbreviations used by genetists on human evolution:

ENA Eastern non African
ANE Ancient North Eurasian
WHG West European Hunter-Gatherer
MHG Mesolithic Hunter Gatherer

To describe the situation right now Klevius comments on recent comments made by genetists re. the DNA of a 36,000 bp modern human from Kostenki (K14) in the European part of Russia (the proposed home area of Uralic languages):

Denisova harbors something chimp-like that isn't shared with the Altai Neanderthal. This might be a signal of the introgression from an unidentified archaic hominin.

Klevius answer/comment: Floresiensis* (from SE Asia and dating from at least 38,000 to 13,000 bp with associated tools from 95,000 bp) was 'chimp-like' except for being a slightly better bipedal walker and a much better thinker although with the same brain volume as a chimp. Btw, it was islam that contributed to the theft and destruction of important parts of the religiously contentious material (in the form of muslim Indonesia's head anthropologist Teuku Jacob of the time).

* Do note that because of the mainly religiously motivated/sponsored objections to this (together with Denisovan) most revolutionary discovery in anthropology so far, a lot of unfounded/illfounded almost hysterical alternative "explanations" were proposed. However, rest assured, there is no doubt whatsoever that floresiensis is for real. Klevius said it ten years ago and you will agree even more 2024!

Ust'-Ishim (a 45,000 bp so called modern human from northern west-Siberia) also appears to harbor Papuan-like ancestry not shared with Kostenki14.

Klevius answer/comment: There are at least two types of 'Papuan-like' ancestry. The one that wasn't island dwarfed and the one effected by it.

All contemporary non-Africans, except Australo-Melanesians, are closer to either Mal’ta (MA1) or MHGs than to K14 [e.g., Z = -5.3, for D (Mbuti, Han; Loschbour, K14); SOM S9; table S10; fig. S19].”

Klevius answer/comment: Last glacial maximum (LGM) and its refuge areas.

Among Eurasians, Papuans and Melanesians furthest from K14.

Klevius answer/comment: If K14 (Kostenki) had got the new genetic brain setup that would of course made them different than those who never left the islands in SE Asia.

The question remains whether Kostenki 14 has Denisovan ancestry.

Klevius answer/comment: It probably had and a paper will likely appear soon.

Kostenki 14 is partly of Basal Eurasian origin.

Klevius answer/comment: Naturally.

Oceanians are closer to Kostenki than to Stuttgart, and closer to Kostenki than to Mal'ta or Loschour. This is very weird to me.

Klevius answer/comment: Malta is more than 10,000 years younger than K14 and hence reflects more mixing. However, Oceanians, although much younger than K14, are furthest away and hence retain some of the original features from SE Asia that they got primarily via taking women of this original trait, i.e. best reflected in mtDNA analysis from that area.

K14 behaves like papuans or South Asians and unlike all other Eurasians, by scoring non-noise level of African at low K.

Klevius answer/comment: Yes.

The populations in Siberia closer to Ajvide and Motala + Evens instead of Gokhem or Iceman + Evens are exclusively Uralic populations, plus Kets. This is interesting because Nganassan and Ket typically get their own component in ADMIXTURE at high K, and this is found amongst Uralic pops usually. It is a secondary component amongst Siberian Altaics like Yakut, who get a more East Asian, less Siberian component on top of the Nganassan one.
Uralic expanded from somewhere east, and the easternmost pops of Uralic are more East Asian than the westernmost ones, so this seems to imply that at the time of the Uralic expansion a scandinavian HG-like pop was still living in much of the Taiga, which got overprinted by the oncoming Uralic wave.

Klevius answer/comment: Yes. Moreover, due to bias/prejudice the importance of Uralic has for long been downplayed - even by Finnish anthropologists/genetists/linguists. 

Also, the fact that West Eurasian introgression into Siberians from the Ob-Yenisei requires 1) a West Eurasian Population that has no basal, thus no modern Europeans, 2) something that is not too ANE-rich like Mal'ta, 3) a conbination of WHG and ANE like Motala so far east in Siberia, means that the situation in Siberia must have been very complex.

Klevius answer/comment: Indeed, what else could you expect from the birthplace of modern humans.

I've seen similar admixture edges from the Denisova/Neanderthal branch to the Oceanians in my own runs, but didn't think these were anything but the usual signals of Denisova-related ancestry in Oceania.

Klevius answer/comment: Probably because you stubbornly kept keeping the theoretical genetic map upside down.

I've even seen an edge from near the Mbuti to Papuans. But I haven't been able to split this signal into Denisova and something else further up the tree.

Klevius answer/comment: It's diffuse because it's behind the island dwarfism scenario.

Ancestors of) Papuans & Mamanwa(Phil.) travelled through Central Asia meeting Denisovans and continued to China coast & east rim of SE Asia to Papua. Unlike pygmies(Andaman, Queensland, Flores), they did not follow the Indian Ocean coast eastward from Africa.

Klevius answer/comment: No, it was Denisovan that travelled through Central Asia and then genetically drowned in the big brained humans of the north.

    For some time now I have thought that Papuans must have admixture with a pre-sapiens SE Asian population. Perhaps that explains the reasonably high Denisova element in them as well. And with Y-DNA K2(xK2a) apparently originating in SE Asia and K2b2 spreading around the world from there we have an explanation...

Klevius answer/comment: Good thinking, albeit quite late considering floresiensis was discovered back in 2004.

    "...Certain cranial features, including very narrow braincase, low and narrow face, marked prognathism (anterior protrusion of the midface), and very wide nose, are typical of tropical populations. The trait combination links the cranium with those of Papuans and Melanesians".

Klevius answer/comment: Yes.

Why do San and Chinese have eye folds and Papuans don't.

Klevius answer/comment: I'm terribly sorry for you having missed Klevius writings on the web for a decade and in book form for more than two decades. I started thinking about it in late 1980s when I met some South Africans who had been with San.

Why do Ainu look like a lighter skinned cross between San and Papuans?

Klevius answer/comment: See above. Also consider the title of the last chapter in Klevius 1992 book: Khoe, San, and Bantu (which should rather have been San, Khoe, and Bantu to be chronologically correct but should then have missed the important linguistic 'Khoe-San' concept).

    The autosome of K14 is closer to WHGs, implying that the pop he came from descended from another that gave rise to ANE, which in turn came from another pop that gave rise to ENA (Oceanian (ASI-Dai)). This is a sequential pattern of splits from the East, and the autosome is not subject to the same kind of information loss as haploid genetics is.

Klevius answer/comment: Seems not to conflict with Klevius theory.

"...Certain cranial features, including very narrow braincase, low and narrow face, marked prognathism (anterior protrusion of the midface), and very wide nose, are typical of tropical populations. The trait combination links the cranium with those of Papuans and Melanesians.

Certain other Upper Paleolithic crania from Europe, too, display “tropical” features. Bodily proportions of Early Upper Paleolithic people reveal southern characteristics as well. This also concerns the arm proportions of the Markina Gora individual, whose forearm was relatively long compared to the shoulder.

http://www.kunstkamera.ru/en/temporary_exhibitions/virtual/gerasimov/09

It seems that early pops in temperate Eurasia all had a rather undifferentiated 'Papuanoid' morphology, pointing to tropical origins in recent periods.

 the same basic people("meta-population)" lived from Europe-central Asia for a span of at least 30,000 years, who "exchanged genes in a very complex network

Klevius answer/comment: A back-migration through archaic sapien territory inevitably means exchanging genes in a complex network - especially considering that the back migrants harbored the new brain setup among some/many of them.

With regard to exactly where K14 is in ANE-WHG:

"An interpretation of the above results would be that K14 is an early member of a lineage leading to western Eurasian MHGs, after their split from the proposed ancestral northern Eurasian lineage including MA1. However, D-statistics of the form D(Mbuti Pygmy, Modern; Ancient, K14), which test whether K14 and an ancient individual form a clade with respect to a modern population, reject this simple tree-like relationship. We find that all contemporary non-Africans, except Australo-Melanesians, are closer to either Mal’ta (MA1) or MHGs than to K14 [e.g., Z = -5.3, for D (Mbuti, Han; Loschbour, K14); SOM S9; table S10; fig. S19]. This would suggest a basal position of K14 with respect to MHGs and ancient north Eurasians, which is also shown in admixture graphs using TreeMix (SOM S12; fig. S24 and S25). In addition, a sizeable component of K14’s ancestry observed in the model-based clustering analyses is predominant in contemporary Middle Eastern/Caucasus (ME/C) populations and Neolithic ancient genomes (NEOL) (Gok2, Iceman, Stuttgart), but absent in MA1 or MHGs (Fig. 1B and fig. S20). This component has been associated with a suggested “basal Eurasian” lineage contributing to NEOL, to explain an observed increase in allele sharing between MHGs / MA1 and East Asians compared to NEOL (21). Since K14 shows the same pattern as NEOL, a parsimonious explanation would be that K14 also derives some ancestry from a related “basal Eurasian” lineage. Consistent with this hypothesis, we find that East Asians are equally distant to NEOL and K14 using D-statistics as described above."

Klevius answer/comment:

1) Kostenki (K14) shows the most similarity with WHG and lesser with modern day Europeans.
- The greatest affinity by f3 is with loschour, and secondarily with La Brana and Scandinavian HGs.
- The greatest component in ADMIXTURE for K14 is shared with N. and E. Europeans.
- f3 stats show the most affinity with Europeans.
- For pairs of pop incl. European and East Asian, K14 is closer to European.
- f3 results are robust to contamination.

2) All pops other than Oceanians are closer to WHG samples or MA-1 than to K14.
3) ADMIXTURE shows K14 share some protion of a component in Neols and Near Easterns.

4) From 2) + 3), K14 had basal Eurasian.
- East Asian equally distant from K14 and Stuttgart using D-stats (!)

5) Siberians from the Ob and Yenisei closer to European than to K14, but closer to Scandinavian WHG than to European, and closer to Scandinavian WHG than to Mal'ta. The best mix not European + Even Siberians, or Mal'ta + Even Siberians, but Motala + Even Siberians, implying early gene flow prior to Mesolithic.

6) K14 has higher Neanderthal segment length than modern pops and later aDNA. Authors draw same conclusion as those for Ust-Ishim, aka 54kya, OOA.

7) Restricting 'analysis to areas without evidence for neaderthal-introgressed haplotypes in contemporary humans results in 0% estimated ancestry for most individuals except K14, where 0.9+-0.4% Neanderthal ancestry is still detected.' Authors attribute this to selection out or drifting out of neand till modern times, or further neand input into K14. No evidence for introgression from other unknown archaics.

8) 'Our results show no close genetic relationship between K14 Australo-Melanesians, and support earlier studies that Australo-Melanesians derive part of their ancestry from an early population divergence that pre-dates the separation of Europeans and East Asians' (!)

Klevius answer/comment: Of course, except for the questionable concept 'modern day Europeans'. What would be 'modern day Asians of Africans?



Peter Klevius theory on human evolution as presented 2004 on the web

Later findings in genetic research has forced Klevius, not to change the basic idea (a small but well packed tropical brain that expanded and culturally developed in the cold north and then globally back migrated) but to add more focus on SE Asia than Africa. The main text is pre-floresiensis, i.e. brief notes abt floresiensis were added later (2004-6 and in bold) without changing the body of the theory. Remember that the theory is anchored in Klevius 1992 discussion about Jinnuishan, Aborigines, Khoe-San and how the brain works (ISBN9173288411). Some details can be questioned now but it will here be strongly argued that there hasn't been available any other theory that gets even remotely as close to the latest findings. Whereas most anthropologists today admit they are confused and surprised Klevius is much less so as you can easily see from the below and his 1992 books.



http://klevius.info/Humandiaspora.html?1085339285543

Out of Africa: How a wrinkled/complex African "Pygmy"*1) brain became "human"/"Mongoloid"* in cold Asia
Human rights, anti-racism/sexism, and a global worldview. without separatism*2) by Peter Klevius                             KLEVUX
Klevius' hypothesis on human evolution (Discuss/refute it via Klevius' Anthropology Blog):

Hypothesis assembled in public in May 2004 (Original idea from 1992 Demands for Resources).
Link to a  pile of open questions related to the hypothesis below. Please add, answer or correct!
Link to "A Nomenclature System for the Tree of Human Y-Chromosomal Binary Haplogroups"
Link to a good background "...that a large component of the present Khoisan gene pool is eastern African in origin and that Asia was the source of a back migration (>20 kyr)  to sub-Saharan Africa..."

Anthropologists  often suffer from a serious, modern  blindness/fear to the meaning of biokinship. This will heavily affect their capability of interpreting foreign, not to say extinct cultural behaviour and social settings (see e.g. P. Klevius 1992 on Popper's World III and "primitivism" and 1996 on the Social State and Klevius' Definition of Religion). This individualism (see World Values Survey)  bias might be of particular concern regarding our understanding of sexual selection (also see From Klevius without love), shamanism etc. How does a woman "select" the "right" sperm in a  tribal, non-monogamic/-close relatives (endogamy/exogamy - see Kinship Atom)  sexual context  when she has only ONE chance per 1-5 yrs? Actually most parental investment and sexual selection theories  seem to suffer from an individualistic perspective. Sexual selection in the form of "rapetivism" (Y/X balance) is yet another source of confusion. The stupid Hamilton's rule is as wrong as every such analysis!

Did the "Aurignacian"*) revolution (starting some 40.000? ya) from Lake Baycal**) to Europe create the multi-racial single-species  we now consider the "real, global humans"?

text written mainly 2003-2004 with some small additions abt floresiensis 2004-2006. Not touched upon since 2006.

*) An advanced tool technology that is solely associated with modern humans and which originated outside Africa. M. Otte in The Aurignacian in Asia: "...discoveries in central Asia permit the distribution of Aurignacian to be extended far beyond Europe, which brings into question the hypothesis of a direct African origin for modern humans."
**) According to S. Wells modern humans spread to Europe (M173) and NEast-Asia (M242) from Central-Asia/Mid-Siberia (M45).
Also note: "Native Siberian populations represent one of the least studied groups in the world".
"...current data indicate a very early development of a “transitional” or early Upper Paleolithic industry in Central Asia."


It seems (P. Klevius 1992) that there has been a marked acceleration in brain development after 400 kya in Central and East Asia. This is consistent with recent findings suggesting more frequent and pronounced climate variations during the period. The last major stage of modern human evolution started (?)  less than 50-80 kya  (also see Out of Africa again and again) perhaps with small "pygmies" (perhaps descending from ape to human hybridization - see Homo floresiensis below as well as the close chimp/Neanderthal connection) with brains that were more wrinkled/complex (e.g. ASPM) than those of the Neanderthals/Erectus/-Pekingensis/Java man and early moderns (also consider map of race distribution below). They spread/developed - like the earlier Levallois-Mousterian tool tradition - (partly due to climate variation) through two different channels (the Levant and the African Horn respectively) a) towards the vast and challenging but also rewarding Central Asia/Siberia (mongoloid traits more than 50 kya? and M173 exported to Europe from Siberia more than 30 kya - see e.g. S. Wells 2002) and b) along the South Asian coust-line (Negritos, M130? less than 50-60 kya, but see South Asia, the Andamanese, and the Genetic Evidence for an “Early” Human Dispersal out of Africa). Late archeological and linguistic traces of the northern route may also be connected to the first Scandinavians, in southern Mesolithic Finland and the west/northern Fosna-Hensbacka culture (extending to the far north-western Norway). Phylogeographic data from Britain  indicate shared ancestry across the north of Europe from Norway to Estonia, possibly reflecting common ancestors dating back to the last glacial epoch. The southern route may also have contributed to the Central-Asian lineage.  Because of different climate conditions the southern pygmies/Negritos (see Genetic affinities of the Andaman islanders) did not change much (before they met the Mongoloids from the North - this view will also solve puzzling y-chromosome similarities) whereas the northern route (M89/9, less than 50 kya)  created more fair-skinned, taller and heavier "mongoloids" (so called "minor local contribution"). Shovel-shaped incisors in both Erectus and Sapiens indicate gene flow and/or shared gene stock/hybridization/drift, or simply an unknown local adaptation. A northern climate with plenty of proteins etc. enforced cultural changes (e.g. longevity and due multi-generational cultural wisdom collected and transfered by the elderly) and changed physical appearance (mongoloid, i.e. adaptation for coldness/darkness/brightness) without the latter necessarily having any direct impact on the former. The distance to the southern Europe (northern Europe was under the glacial maximum) was too short to avoid direct mixing thus making it impossible to create a distinct new "race" ("...the Europeoid movement is clearly fixed at Lake Baikal"). Genes were "pumped" back and forth through mostly the same geographical "veins" by frequent climate changes, hence prohibiting speciation but encouraging local "raciation". When the "mongoloids" returned - through the same routes and/or through M175 or the East-Asian routes (Negritos have shovel-shaped incisors and other mongoloid traits) - with main clashing points perhaps  somewhere in southern China (also compare Taiwan & Gm ab3st) and Southwest Asia. Eurasia "would be the logical homeland of the proto-U6 that came back to Africa and spread in its northwest area around 30,000 ya" . The "source area could lie equally in
northeast Africa, the Arabian peninsula, or even across towards Iran and northwest India". They (i.e. the genes - compare e.g. DYS 391-9 allele - only common among Siberians/Mongolians/Amerinds - in the background of M130T) met (widely in time and space) and "re-shaped" most of the Negritos and remaining older moderns and laid the basis for today's racial pattern (compare Hammer et al 1998). In this scenario the mongoloid traits in Khoisan/Sandawe originated in Asia (also see Khoi, San and Bantu in Klevius 1992 for a socio-cultural interpretation) but ended up in southern Africa (a kind of genetic escapism in "demographic refuges", that actually made them visible) after having met with the non-Pygmy and taller  black population and contributed to the appearance of  North-Africans/Caucasoid people ("Paradoxically, genetic comparisons of Khoisan and Ethiopian populations show both polarity and affinity". It is noteworthy that only Negritos and Khoisan seem to share steatopygia (compare Venus figurines from Baykal to Europe), and that  Khoisan and mongoloids have shovel-shaped incisors (i.e. I suggest that we might find both "original" and "mongolized" click-speakers in Africa less than 37 kya and more than 20 kya). When the already "mongolized" mix of farmers we use to name Caucasoids eventually met with the northern mongoloids they created the blond, Scandinavian type. East Finland, where the lightest people on Earth seems to have evolved, was a straight, dark dead end for farming arriving from southeast (also see Are Finnish related languages Europe's oldest?). Is this related to the haplogroup X mystery? What about blondness in young Australoids? The pattern is also reflected in different genetic studies (see e.g. a possible description of relative genetic distance among Europeans and racial comments). This hypothesis is strongly supported by Diego positive blood distribution and is especially appealing because most (outside East Asia) seem to avoid it (i.e. I don't believe in my own skills as much as in the striking self-explanatory inevitability of such a picture). An interesting mutation called RPS4YC711T may  play a part in future revelations, as may the scattered distribution of YAP+ in Tibet, Japan and southern China, (but less in between or in Siberia). It is also noteworthy that speciation or lack of it interacts in a "sex-biased" way, i.e. may follow/disrupt either through the Y or the X chromosome.  But although we have just started a genetic revolution, physical appearance may still be of great interest for the puzzle, not for racist interpretations but precisely because our understanding of how genetic interaction appears physically is so limited  and  our capability to visually recognize faces etc. is so extraordinary (also compare From Klevius without Love -  on heterosexual attraction, kinship and friendship).    For more on the hypothesis see Klevius Anthropology Blog - NEWS, DISCUSSION & PECULIARITIES!

"They (the North African Fulanis) despise the Black populations to their South, describing them as ‘hyenas, apes, and asses’"
"The million-dollar question of the origin and dispersal of the classical Negroids". Can we even handle the answer and/or are the "pure" Negroids long since already gone? The factual state of Africa's diverse gene pool seems plausible within a pattern of a long distance back and forth migration. One might also compare the above with the earlier rapid transition from African Ergaster to the more advanced Asian Erectus. Furthermore there seems to be an unnecessary bias connected to the geographical "Africa". Why, for example, emphasize (that's what the Afro-American  black man Mr White says) the Herto moderns 154-160 kya, abt 1.400 cc as "Africans" (compare Jinniushan, northern China 250-280 kya, abt 1.400 cc)? A look at the map (African/Asian border) makes such interpretations, at the best,  ridiculous, and at the worst almost like the racist 19th Century "European" "findings". Like "This Eurocentric view of equating AMH with UP tools...." Although the pics (and links) below are choosen with care to describe and enlighten the hypothesis above, please don't hesitate to comment or suggest improvements. As a proponent for basic (negative) UN Human Rights in a future Global Village I don't believe in races other than as historical descriptions of evolutionary events. I'm particularly offended by religious white/black, "caucasoid/negroid" racism (a "mongolized bastard caucasoid whitey" myself).

An attacking "peaceful religion"

Human Rights means diversity - islam/sharia means the very opposite! The only diversity islam knows about is its various ways to attack!

Syed Sadaqat Hussain, November 09, 2014: I always find hard to write on blasphemy because I am afraid to be a victim of the wrath of the so called illiterate pseudo Ulema among the Muslims, who have made my country (Pakistan) a hell for humans. Since 1980s, when the military dictator Gen. Muhammad Zia ul-Haq updated the old colonial laws that criminalized “insulting the religion of any class of persons”, the advantage of this law is being taken by the illiterate clerics of this country who can mobilize seventy percent illiterate people of this country against the minorities.

Klevius question to BBC's Pakistani (but brought up in Saudi Arabia) sharia presenter Mishal Husain: Are you an illiterate muslim? And do you still long for more effective muslim attacks on Jews?

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo all have islam and sharia in common.

Islam's "peaceful" attacks

Islam can never be peaceful. When islam is a "peaceful religion" it's dead because it then looses its attacking power and evil allure. Islam means submission, i.e. to put others down by referring to a third party for judgment or decision. This "third party" is called Allah but because he is never accessible the real "third person" is the licenced authority of being a true muslim against infidels. Although submission can be produced in different ways, e.g. by murdering the infidel or the infidel converting, what is always necessary is aggressive attack, the very soul of islam. As juat one example of islam's variety of attack strategies one may take the simple fact that the reproductive math in islam gives no peace for anything else than a muslim man. It's the muslim man who can marry whoever and who transfers the inevitable muslimhood of the sons while the daughters are forbidden to marry non muslim. Just make a game out of such rules and you will see it's inevitable that the other part will loose.

It's truly extremist and deeply immoral to support such an intolerant attacking racist sexist totalitarian hate ideology!

Islam's attack on little girls

Islam didn't invent the sword. So does this mean that islam has nothing to do with it when a muslim murders an "infidel" with a sword in accordance to the Koran, islamic law etc? That Muhammad's murderous attacks on Jews and other non-muslims had nothing to do with islam?

Female genital mutilation wasn't invented by islam (actually nothing has been invented by islam except the institutionalized jihad/rapetivism axis). However, it's among muslims it's by far most prevalent. In the biggest muslim country Indonesia it's practically 100%.

Susanne Mubarak, former Egyptian president's wife (2007): It is a flagrant example of continued physical and psychological violence against children which must stop.

Klevius: It was the hated western supported Mubarak regime that legislated against FGM in Egypt. Yet it seems to no effect. In Egypt more than 90% of muslim women have mutilated genitals. This 12 year old Egyptian girl, Sohair al-Bata'a, died after genital mutilation. Family and doctor freed from any responsibility. As was islam! The question should not be: What went wrong?

The question should be: Why did they do it to her?

Islam tends to attract evil people and evil deeds while those more ignorant about islam are usually less religiously evil yet prone to defend 'their faith' (read the immoral of their faith) against the West (read against Human Rights equality).

According to most surveys those who profess no religion or self-identify as a-theist or agnostic are more likely to be white or East Asian and less likely to be black, Mideasterner, West/South East Asian.

Klevius advice for an immediate and considerable reduction of so called "muslim extremists" i.e. true muslims: Stop telling lies about islam to our kids! The average muslim or non-muslim young student doesn't know the difference between sharia and Human Rights despite the troublesome fact that they all have been force fed with a massive propaganda education about islam!

Klevius (1992): Whereas God-religions (i.e. not to be confused with Buddhism, Shintoism, Taoism etc a-theist moral teachings) are mirrors, true moral ideologies are windows. And the ultimate moral window is the so called Negative Human Rights. Don't look so confused - look it up!

Also educate yourself with a comparison of OIC's disgusting sharia declaration.

A woman scored the goal of the year - but will it be dismissed because of sex segregation?

Some heroic Saudi women challenging islamic sharia* and

 Stephanie Roche who scored the goal of the year

Stephanie Roche began playing football with the boys on the streets of her native Shankill (compare Pia Sundhage in Klevius PhD thesis). After a brief spell with Valeview FC was curtailed by rules against mixed–sex football she started playing only with girls/women.

See some other beautiful female goals further down.

Btw, this website is already banned by FIFA!

Wonder why. Is it because it, contrary to sharia, defends ALL people's Human Rights or is it because it supports female football - or both?

* Some stupid brainwashed (or deliberately evil) people might try to argue that there are many islams (just like feminists used to say there are 'many feminisms' before Klevius intellectually made it an illogical joke back in the 1990s). However, it all works like this. Saudi initiated, Saudi based and Saudi steered OIC has (via UN) declared not only that sharia should apply to all muslims but also that every muslim country can decide by itself what their particular sharia version means. Moreover, OIC's own global "reference sharia" (the so called Cairo declaration on "human rights in islam") openly declares that sharia always tops Human Rights - hence making the latter a criminal offence against sharia.  

Islam is a dictatorship - even in sports

The extreme stupidity of normative* islam

* Saudi Arabia is not only the Guardian of islam but also the most powerful force behind all the world's muslims world organization OIC which is not only initiated by Saudi Arabia but also based in Saudi Arabia/Jeddah and led by an islamofascist from the Saudi dictator family.
What is the difference between muslim Ottoman harems and the organized and widespread child sex abuse among muslims in the West (compare the Rochdale case and many other similar cases in UK etc). The vulnerable girls were already taken as Ottoman slaves or as the target for insensitive and basically purely commercial state interventions not in the best interest of the child (see the most important sociological paper from the last century, Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state) before they were abused. However, just as in the islamic muslim sex slave harems, the abused Rochdale girls themselves often denied being abused because of some futile favors they first seemed to get.


So next time you see a wealthy Saudi woman "defending" islam/sharia, please consider the extremely simple fact that under Human Rights women can do what they like with their bodies, but under sharia there is always impositions and limitations! So why choose sharia when it means imposing your life choice on others, including vulnerable girls?!

There seems to be an almost total lack of sociologist challenging sex segregation. A possible exception is Pierre Bourdieu's cautious and defensive Masculine Domination which, by the way, may well be his thinnest book. Already the title seems to try avoiding a closer look on feminine domination (of females).

According to Bourdieu. the effects of social position may in some cases reinforce the effects of gender, or in other cases attenuate them, without, it seems, ever eliminating them. By contrast, intensive practice of a sport leads to a profound transformation of the subjective and objective experience of the  body. It no longer exists only for others or, it is no longer merely a thing that is made to be looked at or which one has to look at in order to prepare it to be looked at.
Instead of being a body for others it becomes a body for oneself; the passive body becomes an active and acting body. In the eyes of men, however, those women who break the tacit relation of availability and in a sense re-appropriate their body image, and with it their body, appear as 'unfeminine', even lesbian (Bourdieu 2001:67-68).

In this respect Bourdieu seems to echo Tertullian who, in the early years of Christianity, labeled women's wish to free themselves from the male gaze (heterosexual attraction) as a 'sport of Nature'. Bourdieu continues:

If the old structures of the sexual division seem still to deter-
mine the very direction and form of these changes, this is
because as well as being objectified in disciplines, careers and
jobs that are more or less strongly characterized sexually, they
act through three practical principles which women, and also
their social circles, apply in their choices. The first is that the
functions appropriate to women are an extension of their
domestic functions - education, care and service. The second
is that a woman cannot have authority over men, and, other
things being equal, therefore has every likelihood of being
passed over in favour of a man for a position of authority and
of being confined to subordinate and ancillary functions. The
third principle gives men the monopoly of the handling of tech-
nical objects and machines (Bourdieu 2001).

However, sex segregation is much deeper and multi faceted. Heterosexual attraction need not be a problem neither for women nor men - this has been showed by the West since the 1960s (yes, many men used the time for abuse but most didn't) - but it can easily be used in a confusing/self-confusing manner which opens up for totalitarian sex segregation.

Sex segregation - could also be defined as unnecessary limitations connected to physical differences that has nothing to do with these limitations. However, what is needed in sex segregation studies is the most natural follow up questions. Who questions 'femininity' and 'sexual orientation' and why?

When you pull up that net Klevius wouldn't be surprised to see some (most?) women as well.









What klevius said/showed

Sunday, December 27, 2009

Islamic OIC is an evil dead end of sex segregation whereas football is freedom

Do you see the evil cloud on the map? It's sex segregation: OIC consists of 57 racist/sexist islamic nations which have agreed to violate the negative human rights, i.e. the basis for freedom & democracy!
WHAT A MEDIA HYPOCRISY WHEN THE MUSLIM NIGERIAN TERRORIST IS DESCRIBED AS "EXTREMIST" WHILE HIS TALIBAN LIKE SHARIA ISLAMIC HOME TOWN (stonings, mutilations, corrupt "Sharia banking" etc) IS DESCRIBED AS "MODERATE"! North Nigeria is a disgusting reminder of islamic slavery & islam's devastating effects on Africa through 1400 yrs! AND CONSIDER THAT KLEVIUS HAS FOR LONG BEEN YOUR ONLY TRUE, INTELLIGENT & WELL INFORMED NEUTRAL (yes!) VOICE AGAINST EVILSEX SEGREGATION ON THE NET (the link is abt women's football as well)!




Did Germany's Birgit Prinz, score the best ever goal (incl. those of men) in 2009?

Klevius motivation:

1 The attack (from an in-throw) was as clean as it gets. Check out the video & consider how Simone Laudehr's extremely well placed pass (into an open but crucial area) is taken by Inka Grings who was initially further from the ball than Prinz, who runs in the opposite direction.

2 Inka Grings then does just the opposite to what one would have expected. Instead of running with the ball into the empty space from where she could have tried a cross to Birgit Prinz, she turns against & between two defenders and quickly squares the ball across the penalty area just before Birgit Prinz encounters the defenders.

3 Birgit Prinz accelerates strongly & manages not only to reach the ball before a defender crashes into her, but also to cheat the goalkeeper (see how the keeper moves to the wrong direction) while then perfectly turning her foot in the last fraction of a second to give the ball ultimate precision, before she is smashed to the ground by the flying defender.

Who said women's football is boring?


Size doesn't matter in football
However, although Birgit Prinz is a six footer (179 cm), in footbal you can be any size & still world class. Lionel Messi, the world's best male player 2009 is 169 cm/67 kg, while the next best (Xavi) is 170 cm/69 kg! Third place Ronaldo is 185 cm. Among women Marta da Silva (162 cm/57 kg) is the world's best player for the fourth year in a row, with Birgit Prinz right behind!

Football is the most emancipating sport in the world

This goal hasn’t even been mentioned among the best, perhaps because women’s football is hardly mentioned at all in the media. And the reason for this is the same as with evil islam, namely that so many women participate in directing girls into the sex segregation trap of their own *starting physically with Indonesian muslim women who mutilate every female child, to Western glamour feminists who push their daughters into the time consuming trap of empty & pointless artificial "feminization".

As Otto Weininger put it a century ago: "The main obstacle for women's emancipation is the Woman".
Klevius doesn't in any sense want to point out how women should behave, quite the contrary. He couldn't call himself intelligent if he would, could he! However, what Klevius does want to do is to help minimizing the number of girls who limit themselves or commit self rape becaudse of cultural sexism. In this Klevius stands in the deapest oppositition to islam, while Mr X US "president" says he "respect" islam (and no wonder, look at his islamofascist pals)!

Origin of islam & its evil parasitic booty/sex/slavery/reproduction formula
Btw, a professor friend (sociology) thinks I “uber-emphasize” sex segregation. My question then to him & to all of you is: How can one ever “uber-emphasize” something that affects negatively & directly HALF of the world population, & indirectly the WHOLE of the world population, & which is upheld on no logical grounds at all?! And which constitutes the cornerstone for the evil interface between islam & the rest of the world! And which constitutes the main difference in OIC's Cairo Declaration which (initiated by Saudi islamic theocracy) aims for the destruction of UN's 1948 Human Rights Declaration, combined with a global effort (via UN) to criminalize criticism of islam! Read more from Klevius (e.g. From Freud to bin Laden or What is sex segregation?) to understand why islam & feminism share so much & why the first feminists didn't support votes for women! And why feminists can't agree if Mary Wollstonecraft was a feminist or an anti-feminist!

Or perhaps Klevius Marriage, kinship & friendship

Or even better, the most important sociological paper from the last century: Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state

Sunday, February 19, 2012

Swedish Aftonbladet: Breivik’s and the West’s world view rests on three legs: anti-communism, anti-feminism and islamophobia

Communists, feminists and islamofascists dictate Swedish news media - but Klevius, the worst enemy of fascists and true feminists, doesn't fit their description at all. How come?

Åsa Linderborg (a communist islam loving feminist and chief cultural editor on Scandinavia’s biggest news paper who has profited on her dead working class dad by writing shit about him in a well selling book): Breivik’s and "the leader's of the West" (incl. "Christian members of the cabinet")  world view "rests on three legs: anti-communism, anti-feminism and islamophobia". The “politically correct”, she writes, has for decades been accused for destroying the West. That women should be women and that only the heterosexual nuclear family may produce sound citizens, is an opinion that Breivik shares with both think tanks and Christian members of the Cabinet. Fear of multi-culturalism (why not call it with its proper name Sharia?! – Klevius comment) constitutes the basis for populist government politics in the whole of Europe. The leaders of the West share Breivik’s opinion that muslims are people one is allowed to kill".


Klevius comment: Let's see. No, Klevius doesn't approve of communism and hence sadly has to admit that he "shares the view of Western leaders". And no, Klevius doesn't approve of islam either which fact, according to Saudi islamofascists and their world muslim organization OIC with its Sharia violation of Human Rights, renders Klevius and his stubborn defense of Human (incl. girls/women) Rights the status of being declared an "islamophobe". So what about feminism? Well, almost as long as Klevius has been able to write he has opposed feminism if by feminism we mean its original meaning namely that women should keep up artificial cultural "femininity" as to not "become men" (see e.g. Human Rights from Klevius without love) i.e. what is also called sex segregation and sex apartheid (the very core of islam and feminism).


Feminist opposition to football in England and Sweden

In 1921 England had the world's best female football team. However, due to feminist resistance against females playing football FA banned them from its grounds. The decision was based on a female feminist physician's expert statement that "...the game of football is quite unsuitable for females and ought not to be encouraged."

In Sweden, from the late 1960's for about about a decade feminists (the communist Grupp 8 - Sweden's main feminist movement) very actively opposed female football. Later on Swedish feminists still oppose female football although more under cover and in the form of spitting at penis equipped football experts dealing with female football as "patriarchal domination" when in reality it's been the lack of female ones that has been the problem. And this lack is of course to a large extent to be connected to the active female dismissal of female football. Which fact doesn't exclude the "religious" renaissance for sexist men, not the least via islam. As Klevius has always pointed out: Chauvinism and feminism are married!

In 2011 Japan became the world champion in female football (aka "soccer" in the US so not to confuse it with the "manly" handball game Americans call "football").

Karima Maruyama's 2011 World Cup goal was a real classic when it comes to football technique. Running at high speed towards the side of the goal and then, at the right microsecond,directing a kick just outside the opposite goalpost, hence utilizing the forward inertia in the ball curving it enough to be out of reach for the goalkeeper while still making its way to the inside of the post. Everyone who knows anything about real football honors these kinds of smart goals.And no, it wans't a crossball. She was alone´, she (and the ball) had full speed forward and she had to chose a direct shot at the nearest post or the trickier but under the circumstances right decision to go for the far end of the goal.

So why does Klevius keep ranting about it? Well, simply because this goal and the whole match as well as many other female goals/matches show that the better footballers these women are the more "manly" (or unisex if you like) their technique.


Islam and OIC's Sharia violation of Human Rights is all about sex segregation - and Klevius, not feminists, is, sadly, your best expert on it!

Who is Allah's best friend - and the worst enemy of Human Rights?

There are now more British muslims fighting for the Islamic State than for Britain's military. And most true British muslims support Islamic State.

Islamic State rests on Saudi Wahhabism and Saudi funds. And Saudi Arabia is a close ally of Cameron (and enemy of Putin). Moreover, the Saudi initiated, based and steered sharia organization OIC is another close ally via Cameron's non-elected minister of faith islamofascism, Sayeeda Warsi whom he personally elected as baroness. In other words, Cameron's closest woman is a grave violator of the most basic of Human Rights because of her sharia support and UK representative in OIC. That's why Cameron hates Human Rights and paves the way for making Britain a Saudi Arabia outside the cradle of islam.

Islamic State to Putin: 'This is a message to you, oh Vladimir Putin, these are the jets that you have sent to Bashar, we will send them to you, God willing, remember that.

    And we will liberate Chechnya and the entire Caucasus, God willing," said the militant. "The Islamic State is and will be and it is expanding God willing.
    Your throne has already teetered, it is under threat and will fall when we come to you because Allah is truly on our side.


Paul J. Saunders: Putin often acknowledges the country’s significant Muslim minority, including during a major 2013 speech focusing on Russia’s national identity, during which he said that “Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Judaism and other religions are an integral part of Russia’s identity, its historical heritage and the present-day lives of its citizens.” Importantly, Putin went on to argue, “It is clearly impossible to identify oneself only through one’s ethnicity or religion in such a large nation with a multi-ethnic population. … People must develop a civic identity on the basis of shared values, a patriotic consciousness, civic responsibility and solidarity, respect for the law and a sense of responsibility for their homeland’s fate, without losing touch with their ethnic or religious roots.”

Apparently responding in no small part to controversy in the West, in the months prior to the Olympic Games in Sochi, over Russia’s law imposing fines on individuals or organizations that present “propaganda” about homosexuality to minors, Putin has increasingly emphasized Russians’ shared moral values and to connect Russia’s “traditional” values to those in the Middle Eastern, Asian and other non-Western societies. “We can see how many of the Euro-Atlantic countries are actually rejecting their roots, including the Christian values that constitute the basis of Western civilization … and people are aggressively trying to export this model all over the world. I am convinced that this opens a direct path to degradation and primitivism, resulting in a profound demographic and moral crisis. … We consider it natural and right to defend these values​​.” While clearly identifying Russia as a largely Christian country, Putin is attempting to establish a dividing line between the shared values of believers in many religious traditions and those of the decadent secular West.

Putin was explicit about his foreign policy objectives, saying, “Russia agrees with those who believe that key decisions should be worked out on a collective basis, rather than at the discretion of and in the interests of certain countries or groups of countries. Russia believes that international law, not the right of the strong, must apply. And we believe that every country, every nation is not exceptional, but unique, original and benefits from equal rights, including the right to independently choose their own development path.” Thus, Putin is attempting to exploit huge differences in social values between the West and predominantly Muslim countries in the Middle East and North Africa to make Western values into a liability rather than an asset for Western governments. If consistently implemented over time, this may become Russia’s most significant effort to date to develop a soft power strategy to combat Western influence in the Middle East and elsewhere in the Islamic world.

Klevius:The above, dear reader, is what you really need to focus on. Logically a true muslim should not be allowed to vote as long as s/he doesn't reject sharia. However, as it stands now it's precisely the anti-democratic sharia muslims who multiply fastest due to islamic rapetivism ideology. And as long as their votes count politicians try to get them (no matter that most voting fraud happens in muslim communities). Spice this with oil/gas and you start seeing why Klevius writings are essential, not the least because of Klevius lack of financial or political motives.

And to top it all, non-religious Klevius seems to be your best analyst due to his superior (sad isn't it) understanding of sex segregation and its connection to the origin of islam.

Erdogan: Muslims discoverd America. Klevius: No,they didn't, but they did discover evil* (if Mohammad still qualifies as a muslim, that is)!

* Evil is what goes against the most basic of Human Rights. As for example Saudi based and led OIC's muslim world sharia (the so called Cairo declaration on "islamic human rights").

Islam's split personality: Muslims/infidels, Sunni/Shia, Islamic State/Muslim Brotherhood etc etc!

Islam's many fighting faces have all evil in common - including cutting off each others necks

Turkey has a tragicomic islamofascist as its Fuhrer, and if Charlie Chaplin was still around he might have been inspired to make a funny movie about clown Erdogan

According to Israel's Defense Minister Ya'alon, Erdogan is the 'leader of Muslim Brotherhood Axis'.

Erdogan supports Islamic State. He facilitates their movement and supply across the Turkish border.

Before oil, wherever islam put down its dirty foot it started enslaving people

Throughout history islamic sharia slave finance has always been inseparable from islam itself and can be traced by modern genetics. However, there is a striking lack of old Amerindian genes in Mideast.

Erdogan's pathetic contribution to the disgusting pile of islamic history falsifications

Behind the senseless lie lies the Pluralism Project of Harvard University that was started by the American Muslim Council founder Abdurahman Al-Amoudi – a criminal thug and leader of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood, with the stated mission, “… to help Americans engage with the realities of religious diversity through research, outreach, and the active dissemination of resources.”  It tends to focus on interfaith and non-Christian religions, featuring a sizeable amount of research and information pertaining to Islam.

Frederick William Dame: … this assertion (discovering America) is important for muslims because in conjunction with the relevant verses from the Koran and quotes from Mohammed it establishes the claim of muslims that Allah intended America to be islamic.

After the September 11, 2001 attacks, the bigoted Abdurahman Al-Amoudi hypocritically spoke at the Washington National Cathedral "prayer service" held to honor the memory of the victims.

In 2004 Abdurahman Al-Amoudi pled guilty to three charges of illegal financial transactions with the Libyan government, unlawful procurement of citizenship and impeding administration of the Internal Revenue Service, as well as a role in a Libyan conspiracy to assassinate then-Saudi dictator "prince" Abdullah. He agreed to cooperate in ongoing investigations in return for prosecutors dropping 31 (sic) other counts and possible reduction in a pending 23-year sentence and $750,000 in fines. He was sentenced to 23 years in October 2004.

Al-Amoudi was described as an "expert in the art of deception" in a report by Newsweek journalists Mark Hosenball and Michael Isikoff, for expressing moderate, pro-American sympathies in his lobbying and public relations work with Americans, but then expressing support for Hamas and Hezbollah at an Islamist rally.

Btw, Sweden's Omar Mustafa, leader of the Islamiska förbundet, is now also declared a terrorist by - UAE. Klevius' views seem to be in really bad company, don't they.

Japan makes the world's top technology - yet Europe gets the press! Why?

Why is the media shouting FIRST EVER when a bunch of European countries try to copy what Japan did a decade ago?!

Nissan rocket no. 1 with the Hayabusa robot

Nissan rocket no. 2

With a lap time of 7 min 8 sec Nissan GTR is the fastest, (non-hybrid*) globally-homologated road car around the world's most famous race track Nurburgring in Germany.

The old GTR was the first car to go under 8 minutes at Nurburgring.

* i.e. using a battery and Japanese hybrid technology to get extra power for the short time the ride lasts.

A Nissan Skyline* GTR ATESSA 4WD (2700 cc 6 cyl 280-1600 hp) from the 1990s  - the Japanese legend that Lambourghini Gallardo (5000 cc) was aimed to beat - more than a decade later! But consider huge difference in quality! The old Skyline GTR has the world record for legal cars abt 350 km/h on a German (!) autobahn (unofficial >380 km/h)!

What all GTRs have in common compared to non-Japanese super cars is superior quality. Already in the 1990s a Porsche CEO admitted that they can never achieve the same quality level as the Japanese.

* The new GTR has dropped the Skyline name. However, the basics are the same: 4WD and a small but powerful 6 cylinder engine.

Saturday, November 26, 2005

While Shinto tech lands/takes off from asteroid Sweden’s state radio blinks & brainwashes abt Islam-fascism on first Christmas day!

KORAN-ISLAM - THE BEAST RUNNING LOOSE WITHOUT ANYONE IN CHARGE - , NOT THE PEOPLE, IS THE PROBLEM!
Is Islam the worst crime ever against humanity?
Probably. In fact it’s only Islam’s technological incompetency that has kept the number of its victims down. But the hundreds of millions that has been enslaved, raped, tortured, humiliated and murdered under Islamic ideology during 1400 years are more than enough to make it a good candidate.

What's true Islam/Arab? A "blind", sexist Swedish "Leif Larsson-imam" who calls himself a Sunni "Abd al Haqq"?! - TRUE ROOTS OF "TRUE" ISLAM
(Also see Peter Klevius' definition of religion)

Update: This women hating and obviously also deeply homophobic Swedish top islamist was of course invited and threatened that that if Sweden doesn't give more support to Islam then "something similar as in France may well happen"! I.e. he cowardly and hypocritically acts precisely in accordance with Klevius analysis that "moderate" Islam is tightly connected to violence and terror. This Leif Larsson-imam" who calls himself a Sunni "Abd al Haqq" cowardly avoided the question whether Islam accepts social contact with homosexuals(also see link above). In the same program an Iranian Muslim woman who had escaped Islam in Iran to what she thought of as a secular country where she felt free not to veil herself etc, was named a racist, and yelled at by a fanatic Swedish woman who had converted to Islam and had veiled herself for a year!

Swedish state media hypocrisy
While Japanese Shinto conquers tech & space pan-Arabic totalitarian racist/sexist, slave and oil-fueled pan-Arabic Islam based on contempt for the "infidels" conquers the twisted minds of politicians and certain (i.e. fascist) media people.
This morning every main news channel reported abt Japan's successful landing on an asteroid (Itogawa), sample collecting and planned return back to Earth. However, Sweden's state radio P1 Ekot did not! The same state radio has been extremely silent abt the whole project until Hayabusa failed to contact a mini-robot dropped on the surface some days ago. Then they immediately reeported - but only abt the failure!
The Japanese spacecraft Hayabusa, which already now has done something never done before (and on a low cost budget!), was sent up by a genuinely Japanese rocket and paved its way to Itogawa by a unique new type of engine. It's the first time ever a robot has made such an achievement, and if Hayabusa manages to successfully return the sample back to Earth it has made an equally great leap as did the first Moon explorers! Also see Euro-vulgo vs Shinto high tech, dangerous safety myths, and burning Volvos!




Schizophrenic and hypocritical Islamophilia
But Sweden talks and boosts medieval Islam! Swedish fascist state radio glorifies (on the first traditional Christmas day in Sweden!) pan-Arabic racist/sexist totalitarian oil-fueled Islam fascism while "Muslim" Nalin Pekgul (leader of the socialdemocratic women in Sweden) escapes her Islamic suburb because she is afraid of the Islamists! Still, she wants more Koran schools, mosques etc! I.e. political greedyness overcomes logic.
Although "Arabs dramatically lag behind the rest of the world in democracy, knowledge, and women’s rights."
Said has no more patience for this sort of thing than he did when he wrote Orientalism and Covering Islam, the twin towers of today’s academic Islamophilia."

The background to the fanatic Swedish state media campaign in favour of fascist/sexist/racist/totalitarian pan-Arabic Islam is a recent poll that clearly showed that the Swedes felt heavily reluctant, not to immigrants, but to Islam! Not politically correct, though. But why shouldn't they? It's indeed puzzling how anyone who knows abt the birth of Islam and its context could embrace it unless you use it for your personal fears, contempt/racism/sexism or if you get paid for it. But in Sweden when people "don't understand" political correctness then they have to be brainwashed and/or threatened for being "racists" etc!




The line between moderate and radical Islam is drawn in water!
When the first roadside bomb now hit Swedish troops in Afganistan commentators in Sweden seem surprised. Why us? We're politically corrrect and hate Bush!
The ideology of Islam is death/doxic/rigid and totalitarian - i.e. in every aspect contradicting life itself!! Furthermore it's deeply sexist (see e.g. P. Klevius' From Freud to bin Laden + links).
"While in Mecca, Muhammad was surrounded by enemies, and while there he taught his followers toleration, according to sura 2:256, which says, "Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from error..." As a minor player, surrounded by enemies he did well to receive this 'convenient' revelation. But the call for toleration changed when his power was established in Medina, once the charter had been written which regulated life between the various differing groups. "
"The riots increasingly (and alarmingly) suggest that Islamist radicals see criminality as an opportunity for recruitment, while criminals see Islam as a legitimizer." Klevius comment: Not only criminals but also politicians etc. The first victims of "the sword of Islam" (certainly not a Samurai sword) are those abused to become its bloody edge.
The fate of faith: castration and dilution, and Islam eaten up by the "great Satan".

In a dynamic (living) world there will always be motion/development! And you can’t morally accuse development, can you. That’s why I defended poverty in my book Demand for Resources - on the right to be poor! You see, there's a really schizophrenic and incompatible view on poverty, interest, profit, development etc in Islam. It's been there for some 1400 yrs. The robber's moral and in vain search for justification of sponging (on women, illiterates, dependents, oil, human rights, "West", "infidels" etc). This globalization is inevitably cracking up every ounce of "true Islam". Furthermore development has no skin color. That's something really different from the racist idea that development per se could be accused as "racist"! But the "whites" or the "Europeans" or the "Americans" or the "Japanese" (or maybe including "colored" in the same categories - by the way, I've never met a white human) just happened to be there where it happened! So because development hasn't immediately been followed by a global "fair share" plan, there is no reason to always shout racism. Except one - Islam!. Instead of leaning on Islam and its contempt and sexism ideology every human, no matter if s/he is weak or poor in the West or somewhere else, in the long run benefits from cooperation, not contempt or politically and religiously construed artificial, unnecessary, hindering and dangerous division/separatism. By supporting Islam now you always directly or indirectly support/encourage terrorism and the continuing cultural "prion" (mad cow disease) destruction of young minds.
Dubai - the center of the Islamic schizophrenia and West's main basis in Mideast for the spreading of technology and secularism?
All of the technology you see in Mideast (except Israel) comes from Japan or "the evil West", and its bought for money "earned" on oil found and drilled and transported etc by those same "infidels".
It's then quite remarkable when Sweden, the nation with the highest taxes on the planet, celebrates an immigrant footballer who, when he gets money, immediately starts spending them in Islamic Dubai, the country without taxes, no labor unions, where no one has the vote, where women are packed in black cloth all over (must be convenient in 40 degree Celsius!) and where there are no political parties (OK the last one is almost like in Sweden)!



Much of the evil European heritage may be traced to Mideast. What abt fascism?

Fascism and racism seem inevitable in Europe, and Sweden has always sided with the bad guys´ideologies: Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, eugenicists etc, you name them…

Often led by the coward's wisdom that bad guys don’t forgive if they win.


Saudi Arabia (the homeland of nothing but Islam and oil, is one of the eight worst countries on Earth) is honoured in Sweden and invited to buy weapons and to study etc "cultural exchange"! And it,s logical that a country without human rights spongs on precisely those rights (see The Holy (negative) Human Rights).


Sweden aids Iran’s Islamic WMD (Sweden is Europe's center for dangerous diseases etc)!

Sweden tops rape stats but won't talk Islamic perpetrators.

When the extreme homophobia in Islam is discussed the state radio blinks again and talks Catholic priests!

Sweden had the longest and most ambitious eugenics programme.


Sweden is notorious for its state sanctioned child trafficking etc cruelty (see posting below). And the Swedish state uses to apologize some 30-50 years after! When it's safe...
Although child criminality is on a constant rise all over the world, keeping in mind Sweden's high taxes to the social authorities (the so called "welfare" state), Sweden may well be considered the worst hit on the planet. Of course no one would even dare to research how this may be connected to Islamic/Koranic contempt boosted at home, in mosques, Muslim youth organizations, Islamic schools etc!
Swedish universities are free but heavily state ruled/biased. "Critical thinking" in Sweden means criticism against those who criticize the Swedish system. A new trend is that students in, for example, political science courses aren't allowed to take the final (degree) class if they havn't got a lot of VGs. But to get a VG you have really to confirm to the anti-Bush, leftist way of thinking proposed by handpicked lecturers!

"The human bomb, a boy in his early teens, lost his nerve, broke down and pleaded with Israeli troops guarding a checkpoint to save him. The soldiers kept their nerve, and used a robot to cut him free from the 8 kilograms of explosives strapped to his body. If the whole incident had not been filmed by a passing Palestinian cameraman who works for a press agency, cynics would be dismissing it as a stunt organised by the Israelis. But it is an awfully routine part of life in the Middle East. Suicide bombers are generally young men, although a new tactic favoured by Palestinian terrorists is to bully young women into blowing themselves up, on the promise that by dying they will atone for their so-called sexual infidelities. The only thing that makes this latest attempted attack more grotesque than usual is the fact the bomber was so young. The corruption in the souls of terrorist commanders who sacrifice the lives of young people while they, and their own children, stay safe beggars belief."

PS! No, I don't believe in Mideastern religions or the "religion" of Islam. My only "god" is uncertainty, i.e the dynamics of life itself. See Klevius' definition of religion. Long since, on a party, I met with a guy from Pakistan who seemed to like my conversation. But when I told him that I don't believe in any kind of Mideastern "gods" he looked at me with horror and never talked to me again! I was just surprised back then but now I might mirror some of that horror back to him.

Communism is dead - islam is dying. Long live Human Rights!

Communism at its peak

 
and some Communist zombies clinging on

Acknowledgement: Care for proofread and edited text? Then start donating!

Now it's not IS (Islamic State) but IU (Islamic Ummah/OIC*) that is the worst threat to the free world

* The Turkish wannabe Ottoman Caliph (according to himself), Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, who previously used to lead the OIC Caliphate together with the Saudi caliph (yes, there have been more than one caliph before), who gets his position as “the Guardian of islam” because the Sauds’ right hand happens to possess the stolen land where Mecca and Medina are situated as well as the oil that generates the the wealth of the Saud family! OIC’s former Fuhrer, Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu himself said “that for 13 centuries, muslims had shared a feeling of belonging to the muslim ummah, or global community, bound together under the banner of the caliphate that ended when the modern Turkish republic succeeded the Ottoman Empire in the years after World War I. Following the abolition of the Ottoman Caliphate, many muslims found themselves, for the first time throughout their history, facing the absence of the polity under which they lived for several centuries. The establishment of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (now name changed to the Organization of the Islamic Cooperation) can be seen as the embodiment of the concept of islamic solidarity in the contemporary world”. However, OIC was initiated by, based in, and now also led by Saudi Arabia.

Under a worldwide muslim sharia Umma (OIC) Saudi islamofascism is protected from Human Rights criticism

Had the Saudi islamofascist not been that stupid and presumptuous* that they created OIC as an open excuse for abandoning Human Rights, then the downfall of islam might had become less "revolutionary".

* spurred by ignorant or cunning islam supporters in the West (many of them communists)

The muslim UK ambassador of Saudi islamofascism implies that 'the vast majority of muslims around the world' are Wahhabists - or

Mohammed bin Nawaf Al Saud, Ambassador of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the United Kingdom: Muhammad Ibn Abd al Wahhab, was a well-travelled, learned, scholarly jurist of the 18th century. He insisted on adherence to Qur’anic values and the teachings of the prophet Muhammad (PBUH) which includes the maximum preservation of human life, even in the midst of jihad. He taught tolerance and supported the rights of both men and women.

Klevius: See below, Klevius' more truthful description of this immoral muslim islamofascist cleric.

Mohammed bin Nawaf Al Saud, Ambassador of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the United Kingdom: Let me make it perfectly clear. The government of Saudi Arabia does not support or fund the murderers who have collected under the banner of the Islamic State. Their ideology is not one that we recognise, or that would be recognised by the vast majority of Muslims around the world – whether they were Sunni or Shia.

Klevius: Nor would the Saudi ideology!

Mohammed bin Nawaf Al Saud, Ambassador of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the United Kingdom: Under the leadership of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques, King Abdullah, we launched an initiative for dialogue between all religions and cultures in 2008 with the establishment of the King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz International Centre for Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue in Vienna.

Klevius: Why not in Mecca?!

Mohammed bin Nawaf Al Saud, Ambassador of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the United Kingdom: Following an international counterterrorism conference held in Riyadh in 2005, the UN counterterrorism centre was established with financial support of $200m from our government. We have been and are fighting extremism within our own borders daily, indeed hourly.

Klevius: Really! Counterterrorism? Meaning chasing down Human Rights defenders, Atheists etc "terrorists" and "extremists" in accordance with your new sharia laws protected by your own islamofascist UN organization OIC!

Mohammed bin Nawaf Al Saud, Ambassador of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the United Kingdom: Firm action is taken against any imam who is found to hold extremist views (like the Shia imam you are about to behead) and who tries to incite their followers to violence (i.e. what you in other contexts name liberators). We have passed laws and warned our citizens that they will be arrested and prosecuted if they attempt to join Isis or any other international terrorist group, or to take part in any of the conflicts raging in any region. We have done and will do everything we can to stop the spread of this corrosive poison in our country and region and encourage all other governments to do the same.

Klevius: You are the 'corrosive poison' that has ruined so many peoples lives! Not only are you the world's worst per capita polluter, you are also the country with the worst Human Rights record. And no wonder because you have criminalized Human Rights equality. You are the most immoral and hypocritical state the world has ever seen!

David Commins, author of “The Wahhabi Mission and Saudi Arabia” and a professor at Dickinson College in Pennsylvania: Islamic State and Wahhabi doctrines overlap in puritanism and xenophobia toward non-muslims and Shiite”. A key difference is the caliphate agenda used by Islamic State’s leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and a revival of a term used by earlier islamic leaders that suggests a wider ambition to rule all Muslims. That was never part of Wahhabi doctrine.

Klevius, the world's foremost expert on sex segregation/apartheid (sad isn't it) and therefore also origin of islam: Of course it was, it just lacked the means. Wahhabism means going back to the origin of islam and that inevitably means opening up for whatever totalitarian world conquering ambitions. Certainly bigger than Hitler and his German Nationalsocialists ever dreamt about.

James Dorsey, a senior fellow in international studies at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore: Abdulaziz halted his expansion once most of the Arabian Peninsula was conquered, and turned against the Ikhwan, whose main leaders later surrendered to the British. That history underscores another distinction with Islamic State, that between an established power and an expansionist upstart.

Klevius, the world's foremost expert on sex segregation/apartheid (sad isn't it) and therefore also the origin of islam: Established power? Like the Soviet union!

James Dorsey: The House of Saud wants to ensure its grip on power and doesn’t seek to expand beyond its borders or “create one unified Muslim state that would be ruled by a caliph. Islamic State seeks to topple existing regimes that it views as apostate.

Klevius: Then he pukes out the usual PC vomit: Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah, has tentatively promoted women’s role in the workplace since ascending to the throne in 2005 and encouraged thousands of young Saudis to study abroad through a state-sponsored scholarship program.

Klevius, the world's foremost expert on sex segregation/apartheid (sad isn't it) and therefore also the origin of islam:  Poor dictator "king" Abdullah, all women's liberator in his heroic fight against the unspecified dark forces in Saudi Arabia?! Really?

Fahad Nazer, a political analyst at JTG Inc., a consultancy based in Vienna, Virginia, who has worked for the Saudi Embassy in Washington: Comparing Saudi Arabia to the Islamic State “neglects the gradual but significant cultural change that has taken place since the 1990 Gulf War.

Klevius, the world's foremost expert on sex segregation/apartheid (sad isn't it) and therefore also the origin of islam: 'The gradual but significant cultural change' is nothing else than petrol-dollars and as such doesn't alter the evilness of original islam in any positive direction. Saudi fueled global street jihadism is directly proportional to the oil barrel price.

Wahhabism is more or less the same in Saudi Arabia and the Islamic State

A dominant strand to the Saudi identity pertains directly to Muhammad ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhab (the founder of Wahhabism), and the use to which his radical, exclusionist puritanism was put by Ibn Saud. (The latter was then no more than a minor leader -- amongst many -- of continually sparring and raiding Bedouin tribes in the baking and desperately poor deserts of the Nejd.)

The second strand relates to dictator  Abd-al Aziz's subsequent shift towards statehood in the 1920s: his curbing of Ikhwani violence (in order to have diplomatic standing as a nation-state with Britain and America); his institutionalization of the original Wahhabist impulse -- and the subsequent seizing of the opportunely surging petrodollar spigot in the 1970s, to channel the volatile Ikhwani current away from home towards export.

Based on the 14th century islamist Ibn Taymiyyah, Abd al-Wahhab, despised the decorous, arty, tobacco smoking, hashish imbibing, drum pounding Egyptian and Ottoman nobility who travelled across Arabia to pray at Mecca.

Taymiyyah had declared war on Shi'ism, Sufism and Greek philosophy.

One of the main tenets of Abd al-Wahhab's doctrine has become the key idea of takfir. Under the takfiri doctrine, Abd al-Wahhab and his followers could deem fellow Muslims infidels should they engage in activities that in any way could be said to encroach on the sovereignty of the absolute Authority (i.e. the "king").

There is really nothing that separates Wahhabism from the Islamic State other than that the latter is closer to Wahhabism than the Saud dictator family.

Like "prophet" Mohammad, Abd al-Wahhab was expelled from his own town and in 1741 he found refuge under the protection of Ibn Saud and his tribe. What Ibn Saud perceived in Abd al-Wahhab's novel teaching was the means to seizing power, again a repetition of the origin of islam. Their strategy, like that of the Islamic State today, was to bring the peoples whom they conquered into submission by instilling fear, and by "justifying" it as jihad.

Ibn Saud's gangsta clan, seizing on Abd al-Wahhab's doctrine, now could do what they (and "prophet" Mohammad) always did, i.e. raiding neighboring villages and robbing them of their possessions in true islamic manner.

In the beginning, they conquered a few local communities and imposed their rule over them. (The conquered inhabitants were given a limited choice: conversion to Wahhabism or death.) By 1790, the Alliance controlled most of the Arabian Peninsula and repeatedly raided Medina, Syria and Iraq.

A British official, Lieutenant Francis Warden: 'They pillaged the whole of it [Karbala], and plundered the Tomb of Hussein... slaying in the course of the day, with circumstances of peculiar cruelty, above five thousand of the inhabitants ..."

Osman Ibn Bishr Najdi: Ibn Saud committed a massacre in Karbala in 1801. We took Karbala and slaughtered and took its people (as slaves), then praise be to Allah, Lord of the Worlds, and we do not apologize for that and say: 'And to the unbelievers: the same treatment.'

In 1803, Abdul Aziz entered Mecca, which surrendered under the impact of terror and panic (as did Medina). Abd al-Wahhab's followers demolished historical monuments and all the tombs and shrines.

1803 a Shiite assassin killed Abdul Aziz (taking revenge for the massacre at Karbala). His son, Saud bin Abd al Aziz, succeeded him and continued the conquest of Arabia. In 1812, the Ottoman army pushed the Alliance out from Medina, Jeddah and Mecca. In 1814, Saud bin Abd al Aziz died and his son Abdullah bin Saud, was taken by the Ottomans to Istanbul, where he was executed after having been humiliated in the streets of Istanbul for three days, then hanged and beheaded, his severed head fired from a canon, and his heart cut out and impaled on his body.

18th century Wahhabism reignited when the Ottoman Empire collapsed during World War I. Compare this to the origin of islam in the wake of Roman withdrawal and the fall of the Sasanian empire. The Al Saud were led by Abd-al Aziz, who, on uniting the fractious Bedouin tribes, launched the Saudi "Ikhwan" in the spirit of Abd-al Wahhab.

The Ikhwan was a movement of armed Wahhabist "moralists" who almost had succeeded in seizing Arabia by the early 1800s. Now the Ikhwan again succeeded in capturing Mecca, Medina and Jeddah between 1914 and 1926. The Ikhwan and Abd-al Aziz, however, ended up in a civil war that lasted until the 1930s, when Abd-al Aziz by the help of Western technology had them machine-gunned down for good.

With the help from oil dug up and processed by Western technology Saudi goals were to reach out and spread Wahhabism across the Muslim world, thereby utilizing islam's "single creed" message for Saudi Arabia.

Sunni (i.e. Saudi) islam embedded Wahhabism educationally, socially and culturally throughout the muslim Umma, hence also
creating a western policy dependency on Saudi Arabia that has endured since Abd-al Aziz's meeting with Roosevelt.

Westerners chose to presume that Saudi Arabia was bending to the imperatives of modern life.




What Klevius has said before about Wahhab the father of Saudi islamofascism (2010)

The root man of Saudi islamofascism was Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab who, during his studies in Basra in the 18th C, got seriously dazzled by glimpses of the European Enlightenment twinkling through the temporary crack to the West called the "Tulip period". He then retreated back into his medieval islamic darkness & as a result, came to position himself as the very opposite to the British "Glorious revolution" which fought against Catholic papacy, & which ended up in Lancashire's coal fueled textile industries as the beginning of the modern industrialized* world based on technology & rationality rather than on religious superstition & fundamentalism (also compare Shinto vs islam). A major outcome of industrialization was universal suffrage & the idea about negative human rights.

 * isn't it an irony then that Britain, who started the series of modern revolutions as well as industrialization, came to deeply embed itself with the most intolerant, racist & sexist constitution, i.e. the Saudi islamofascist state which was incapable of producing anything by itself except hatred & more fanatic muslims!

Together with the criminal "house of Saud" Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab then confined the Arabs in islamic backwardness &, in addition, the Arab women in an islamic burka of extreme Sharia sex segregation/apartheid.

After having robbed Mecca & Medina, the Sauds/Wahhabis run the stolen country by the help of what they fleeced from visiting pilgrims. This was the main source of income until Westerners found/drilled oil & made the lazy islamist looters even wealthier.

(analysis taken from Homo Filius Nullius by Peter Klevius).

Klevius comment: And today this evilness threatens the free world through spineless politicians and UN! The banner of Enlightenment is now upheld by heroic women, e.g. African Ayaan Hirsi Ali who has suffered as a victim of islam(ofascism) and escaped to the West, only to find that she was abandoned by those she thought would protect her! In fact, Western politicians and media are busy implementing that very Arab-islamic oppression so many muslims have escaped!

Human rights vs islamofascist "rights"

According to Koran-islam only true muslims can be considered real humans. The rest of the world hence belongs to either category two infidels "of the book" and or category three infidels (without "a book" presumably). However, there's also a fourth category which can never reach a fully human level in accordance with Koran-islam. Those are girls and women!

Sex segregation is to be understood as lack of rights because of one’s sex as referred to in the UN Declaration on Human Rights from 1948: "Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in the Human Rights Declaration, without distinction of sex. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty."

This conceptualization may be compared to the sex segregated "rights", in the Cairo declaration from 1990: "All men are equal in terms of basic human dignity and basic obligations and responsibilities, without any discrimination on the grounds of sex."

The main difference between these declarations is that the former is negative, i.e. without room for interpretations and negotiation and due interventions, whereas the latter is positive, i.e. connected to “obligations and responsibilities”. Negative rights are here seen as not synonymous with natural rights, because the latter presumes the existence of certain rights, i.e. is in fact positive, whereas the former does not.

Whereas "entitled all the freedoms" is a negative right, "basic human dignity and basic obligations and basic responsibilities" are all positive rights. Through "responsibilities" negative human rights can easily be restricted & even eliminated.

Furthermore, "in terms of basic human dignity and basic obligations and basic responsibilities" are all tied to some imagined or real basic tenets which may include whatever tradition or belief about segregation that is at hand, i.e. the very opposite to freedom in the original UN charter. The very fact that "obligations and responsibilities" are mentioned and tied to "equal" opens up for inequality on the grounds of sex. If dignity, obligations and responsibilities are coupled to sex it inevitably means that they differ between the sexes.

So when Mary Wollstonecraft wrote A Vindication of the Rights of Woman the Saudi islamofascists were already busy with the opposite task, i.e. the original islam. In fact, the true nature of islam & its “Allah” is now slowly emerging in all its evil infidel racism & sexist confinement/rapetivism, easily traceable through 1400 years of heinous crimes (incl. physical genocides, hundreds of millions murdered & enslaved) against humanity, not to mention ethnic & cultural genocides - still ongoing in Sudan etc.

Don't let Arabian oil wealth obscure the true nature of their backward ideology - not because it's backward but because it's truly evil!

The stereotype of the “peaceful” muslim isn’t true. S/he isn’t necessarily peaceful but rather ignorant about her own "religion" which is in fact nothing but politics pretending as a faith.



Here's what Klevius wrote

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Before shouting "islamophobia", aswer this question: Do you support islam or Human Rights? You can't get both!

Always this tiresome, empty but utterly laughable islam excuse "not all muslims are..."! Quite the contrary, By calling yourself a muslim believing in islam you inevitably also support OIC and Sharia, and, as a consequence, violate Human Rights (see more about this fact below)!

This is Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, an Egyptian born Turkish islamist and der Fuhrer of OIC, the Saudi initiated and based islamist organization that has abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with Sharia, and which tries to criminalize all scrutiny of islam's atrocities! Are you for or against him and OIC?

So let's rather talk about what real islam is really doing! I try to make it short and easy:

1 Real islam is today undeniably OIC (Organization of islamic cooperation). OIC consists of 57 member states and has abandoned Human Rights and replaced them with Sharia in the UN (a fact most ignorant "revolutionaries" in the "Arabic spring" were quite misinformed about!

2 Because of the enormity of islam's slavery and genocide atrocities throughout its existence, and because of the share numbers of those poor (because of islam's innate parasitism and due impotency for producing other than new muslims) people not daring (apostasy ban) calling themselves other than "muslims", many feel it's impossibly to really point out how disgusting islam really is!

Hence the only option is to cover it up by calling it "defamation of religion" thus protecting islam from its own evilness. It was pure evilness (hateful racism and sexism) that paved the way for islam's original jihad slaughtering and enslaving and much later on, under Malik, became Koran and Mohammedanism, i.e. the atrocities were reformulated as "the will of Allah", i.e. blamed on "god". Not only that, islam's specific evilness also consists of its one way policy, i.e. that islam ideally wants to swallow individuals but never let them out again. Likewise, for islam it's impossible to accept full equality between the sexes. Especially this point makes it impossible for islam to exist in a world that follows the 1948 Human Rights declaration which clearly states that there should not be any limitation because of an individuals sex etc.

Of course one could imagine a scenario were islam reforms in accordance with the basic freedom principles in the original Human Rights declaration. However, that would be the end of islam itself and Klevius could immediately stop writing about it! This ideal scenario, however, has been made impossible by Saudi based OIC and those who naively or deliberately have supported it! Every muslim who doesn't accept this must rename to non-Sharia muslim or abandon muslimhood altogether.