Sayeeda Warsi wants to silence your right to know the truth about islam
Wikipedia: In June 2008, the OIC conducted a formal revision of its charter. The
revised charter set out to promote human rights, fundamental freedoms,
and good governance in all member states. The revisions also removed any
mention of the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam. Within the
revised charter, the OIC has chosen to support the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights and international law.
[3][not in citation given]
Klevius: Utter lie! The Cairo declaration and its function hasn't
changed a bit, quite the contrary! It continues to sanction muslim
states and muslim imams following Human Rights violating Sharia. And
when the diabolic Saudi based OIC and its islamofascist Fuhrer Iyad
Madani pretends to condemn violence it's through a bigotted and
hypocritical filter that ultimately conforms with islam's racist/sexist
original agenda that only condemns violence against muslims
So why hasn't this Wikipedia entry been corrected?! Same reason that
islamofascist muslims (i.e. Sharia supporting Human Rights violators)
like Sayeeda Warsi and Iyad Madani aren't arrested for deliberately
violating Human Rights.
Nov 30, 2013 - Sayeeda Warsi cites Sharia supremacist OIC, as her 'key partner in quest to promote "religious freedom"'.
Klevius comment: By calling evil islam a religion "religious freedom" sanctions this evilness!
Where her Lord friend Nazir Ahmed threatened UK with 10,000 muslim
street jihadists Sayeeda Warsi threatens her party with the loss of
muslim votes (especially crucial because they also include so many fraud
votes)
Sayeeda Warsi's mentor and very close friend in her years trying to make
her way up the West Yorkshire political ladder was Nazir Ahmed who was
made a Labour peer by Tony Blair soon after 1997. Blair's people did not
bother to contact a single Labour person in Yorkshire about the
nomination. Ahmed was a local businessman and Labour councillor because
in his Labour-run town only Labour could help with planning permission
or getting settlement rights for poor people in Kashmir who came to the
UK for cousin marriage or for old age family care thus maintaining the
stronghold a few men had over the community and its voting behavior.
Nazir Ahmed was also the muslim guy who got away with a couple of weeks
for killing a man after having sms-ed for a long time while driving.
see more about muslim voting fraud in UK furthest below
Sayyeda Warsi also visits the deepest of muslim rat holes, Oman - and praises it beyond belief!?
Sayeeda Warsi: There is nothing quite like standing here at
Muscat’s spectacular Grand Mosque, a place of deep spirituality and
immense beauty. For me, this is something of a home from home – not only
because it is a symbol of the faith I hold so dearly, islam, but
because its construction was partly down to a British company! And it is
therefore the perfect backdrop for me to talk about religious
tolerance. For Oman under His Majesty’s wise leadership is a symbol of
that very co-existence we are all striving for.
Klevius comment: Noah Al Saadi's and Muawiyah Alrawahi's arrest
is reflecting a common pattern in the muslim Gulf countries – including
Oman – of using abductions, arbitrary arrests, unlawful detentions and
mistreatment to silence and punish Human Rights activists and dissident
voices. And if the noise in the West gets too laud they are usually
"freed" via Sharia black mailing, e.g. if they submit to what they
criticized in the first place, or are declared in sane.
There are numerous other cases of what in the Wests amounts to a
judicial and police harassment campaign that is widespread in this
region, but which, according to Sharia, is perfectly in line with islam.
As you have heard repeatedly, islam is different in different places
and settings. However, islam is always against the most basic of Human
Rights!
When should people learn what Klevius has preached for more than a
decade on the web: Islam is incompatible with Human Rights and precisely
therefore islam supporters want to hide this fact by calling Sharia
(islamic) "human rights"?!
Muslim Oman was the main enslaver of East Africans for more than thousand years
This is a slave monument on Zanzibar which used to be a main Omani slave
hub. Omani muslims used to have their slave concentration camps on
islands outside Africa's coast so to better defend and/or distance
themselves against possibly angry Africans.
It's a pity that no one dares to publish Klevius'
Roots Guide, isn't it.
In the meantime, do read about the disgusting Omani muslims and their
slave rading/trading. And about the long wars Britain had to fight
against Omani muslim's Sharia slavery.
October 09, 2010
Rampant Muslim Voter Fraud Turning Britain Into Banana Republic
Originally posted on The Gates of Vienna.
"It is not a surprise that by importing the Third World you become the
Third World, but what is surprising is our reaction to the very real
subversion of our ancient and bloodily defended democracy — which is
that of total appeasement and dhimmitude."
Banana Republic Britain
Paul Weston by Paul Weston
As the haunting wail of the Muezzin — recently described by Barack Obama
as the sweetest sound in the world — roused the slumbering Pakistani
inhabitants of Mirpur, Kashmir, to Morning Prayer, young Sammy Mohammed
was awakened somewhat more brutally by the boot of local Mirpurian MP,
Sultan Mehmood Chaudhry.
“By ’eck Sammy lad, tha lazy young beggar, tha’ll not be thwarting
democracy in Britain by festering in t’pit all day, by gum. Hand over
them proxy votes sharpish, me lad, lest tha want thy backside tanning!”
The beginning of a satirical article? I am afraid not. It is routine
practice for dual-nationality Pakistanis residing in Kashmir to sign
thousands of proxy vote forms for the British General Election, in order
that their Pakistani brothers in Britain may use them to subvert our
democracy.
One “British” Mirpuri resident described the blind signing of the electoral proxy votes thus:
“They said I didn’t have to fill in any details, just to sign my
name at the bottom of the form,” he says, smiling. “So I signed two…I
personally know 25 other people who did the same thing, lots of people
just on this street, but everybody does it.”
Having collected thousands of forms, Pakistani politicians such as
Sultan Chaudry hop on the Kashmiri red-eye to Britain, where they
distribute said forms amongst the many Muslims in our vibrantly diverse,
exotic and eclectic multicultural cities, whilst advising them where
their fraudulent vote should be cast to best represent their decidedly
un-diverse and un-vibrant 7th Century mono-culture. In a BBC interview
conducted in Manchester, Chaudry said:
“I’m here for the 6 May election. I always come during
elections…it’s basically so I can tell people how to vote and who to
vote for…most of the Pakistanis here are from Mirpur, and I am the MP
from Mirpur, and I know the issues here and who will be the best
candidates to help solve the issues in Kashmir.”
Even more astonishing than Pakistani politicians visiting Britain to
tell the “British” electorate who to fraudulently vote for in order to
solve the Kashmir Question, is the positively surreal concept of British
politicians travelling to Pakistan to woo the local vote for precisely
the same reason. That this actually happens is a damning indictment on
how reliant Labour/Socialist politicos have become on the Third World
vote if they are ever to regain power.
Many people will be flabbergasted that such Third World practices can
occur in Great Britain. These flabbergastees however, do tend to be
foreign. The British, immersed in a cauldron of rapidly warming
multicultural soup and floating alongside a clearly overheating yet
curiously blasé frog, have been subjected to such a relentless barrage
of propaganda over such a lengthy period of time that most fail to
realise what is being done to both themselves and their country.
And it gets much worse.
A few thousand peripatetic Kashmiri proxy votes pale into insignificance
when compared to the postal voting fraud that is now endemic in what
was once the seat of European democracy. When the Labour Party
introduced postal voting on demand, they did so in the full knowledge it
would create massive fraud, yet were more than happy knowing that the
fraud would benefit Labour above all other parties.
How does one apply for a postal vote, or even multiple postal votes?
Simply download a form from the Electoral Commission, make up a name(s)
and address, and one or more postal votes will miraculously appear on
your doormat. It does not need to be your own name, of course, and if
you are one of the 100 bogus-named people living in a solitary
two-bedroomed flat in Tower Hamlets, it is unlikely you will even be
investigated, particularly if you register at the last possible moment
before the election.
In other words, you do not need to exist in order to gain multiple
postal votes. Taking it even further, some houses do not even exist! A
row of terraced properties may end at number 64, but whilst the wraith
like apparitions of numbers 66-70 may not actually exist in reality, the
local postman, Mr Abdul Aziz, knows very well where he should deliver
the extra 200 postal votes designated for the non-people within the
non-houses.
The Electoral Commission simply cannot keep up. Multicultural Britain is
experiencing such a massive racial and demographic shift that to track
and record individuals has become an utterly impossible task.
Particularly so when each official form is printed and distributed in
over 20 different languages before being processed by staff who among
them speak only three.
This has led to dangerous levels of fraud. In 2004, Judge Richard Mawley
QC presiding over an electoral vote-rigging case in Birmingham had this
to say: “The (postal vote) system is wide open to massive, systematic
and organised fraud that would disgrace a banana republic.”
Shortly before the 2010 election, the police were investigating upward
of 50 cases of electoral fraud, principally in Labour-controlled areas.
Since the election this number has climbed to 81 cases, but little has
happened since, because the alleged fraudsters were invariably Muslim
and the police are loath to prosecute for fear of appearing “racist.”
In a scarcely believable precedent, Commonwealth electoral monitors were
despatched to Britain to scrutinise the election result for the first
time in our history, with one native from Zimbabwe suggesting that
Britain lagged far behind Mr Mugabe’s regime when it came to democracy.
He cited as an example the fact that Zimbabweans could only vote once,
because indelible ink was applied to their finger après-vote, whilst
non-existent “ghosts” in Britain could make multiple postal votes with
no checks whatsoever.
And it is hard to argue with him on this point. Dear God, who would have
thought a few years ago that by 2010 Britain could be accused of being a
banana republic by Zimbabwe! And still we refuse to wake up.
But we need to. Before the Labour Party came to power it was impossible
to register to vote once the election had been called. Labour changed
this to allow registration up to 11 days after the election was called.
This time-frame allows people to register and vote before any checks to
prove their existence can feasibly be carried out — which is exactly
what was intended.
The result of this has been an upsurge in postal voting applications,
sometimes up to 200% higher than in the previous election. In ex-Home
Secretary Jack Straw’s constituency of Blackburn, postal voting was
running at 30% of all votes cast compared to only 15% as a national
average. In the month before the election, some half a million
new“voters” registered with the Electoral Commission, representing an
increase of almost one fifth since the election of 2005.
One voter of Pakistani origin, who requested anonymity for fear of
reprisals, told The Independent newspaper that postal vote fraud in
Blackburn was widespread. “It’s worse than Birmingham, the mosque
committee is 100 per cent Labour. They control the mosque. They frighten
the people.” Teams of Muslims were seen distributing and collecting
sheaves of postal ballot papers which were picked up on street corners
en-route to the “sealed” ballot box.
This assertion is backed up by Craig Murray, Britain’s former ambassador
to the central Asian republic of Uzbekistan, who was campaigning in
Blackburn to unseat Jack Straw. The challenge was rather unsuccessful as
it transpired because Mr Straw allegedly achieved 90% of the vote, a
margin unheard of outside North Korea. Mr Murray told the Independent:
“I’ve come from Uzbekistan to Blackburnistan…this is very much a Labour
rotten borough…there is a nexus of the police, the authorities and
business — if we were in the Soviet Union, you would say mafia.”
The Independent is a liberal leaning newspaper experiencing a number of
“teachable moments” as Mr Obama might say. Alerted to a possible massive
postal voting fraud in Bangladeshi controlled Tower Hamlets, East
London, the newspaper sent intrepidly bearded Jerome Tayler to
investigate as to why “there have been as many as 20 Bengali names
supposedly living in two or three-bedroom flats. When journalists have
previously called, all too often there are far fewer living there, in
some instances, no Bengalis at all.
Poor Mr Tayler discovered that the locals take exception to being
investigated by impertinent young infidel reporters, even if they are
liberal and bearded, and having declined to answer his questions gave
him a good pasting instead. Given a few more unsuccessful missions into
bandit country looking for the source of fraudulent postal ballot
papers, it is possible that Mr Tayler may even refer to his assailants
as politically driven Muslims rather than “poverty stricken Asians.”
Just in case these fraudulent postal ballots could be detected after the
election, the Labour Party allowed them to be mixed in with the ballot
papers from local polling stations, where, although identification is
not required (why not?) at least faces are recognised and names crossed
off a list. As such, any individual attempting to cast multiple ballots
in a polling station would be quickly recognised and rumbled, so the
vast majority of these ballots are therefore legitimate.
This is not the case of course for the postal voters, which is precisely
why postal voting has experienced such a massive upsurge and precisely
why Labour Party officials were so keen to lose the fraudulent postal
ballots amongst the legitimate polling station ballots.
This destruction of British democracy, although appalling in itself, is
not of the highest importance unless the fraud actually affected the
election results, but now we learn that it has. In the May 2010 British
General Election, the Conservative Party failed to gain a majority by
the slimmest of margins, with only a handful of constituency seats
swaying the result. This recently led Conservative Party Chairman,
Baroness Warsi, to make the extraordinarily explosive claim that The
Conservative Party failed to win a majority because of “Asian” electoral
fraud.
Just before the election, ex- MP Martin Bell suggested that the result
could be decided by electoral fraud. And so it has been proven. It is
not a surprise that by importing the Third World you become the Third
World, but what is surprising is our reaction to the very real
subversion of our ancient and bloodily defended democracy — which is
that of total appeasement and dhimmitude.
The idea that British democracy has been subverted by Socialist enabled
Muslim fraud is an enormous front page story. Or it should be, yet
having broken the potentially biggest story in Britain so far this
century, Baroness Warsi and the press have become strangely reticent.
Her appearance on BBC “Question Time” has been cancelled and the MSM,
although not exactly in deep denial, are hardly giving this astonishing
claim the attention it deserves.
Even liberals must be starting to realise why Islam, when translated,
means Submission. If Muslims can illegally alter the course of a British
General Election with barely a word of criticism or investigation
—based on our fear of them — then we are in terrible, terrible trouble
and that trouble can only become worse.
The multicultural cauldron we Brits share with the overly-optimistic
frog is still only warm, but within a generation and the doubling of our
Muslim population it will be boiling. The Authorities could turn the
heat down if they so wished, but they appear dedicated instead to
turning it into a pressure cooker with the lid tightly screwed down,
seemingly unaware that the rapidly building steam must eventually find a
release somewhere.
And nothing can build the steam quicker than favouring the enemy above
your own soldiers and airmen. Whilst I may have given the impression
that is remarkably easy to obtain voting rights in Britain, this is not
always the case. Members of our Armed Forces for example find it very
difficult indeed.
In one of the more perverse outcomes of Socialist rule, we find that
whilst British Pakistanis fighting against the British Army in
Afghanistan may use their proxy/postal vote to influence British
democracy, British soldiers, fighting for their country at the behest of
their government, find themselves disenfranchised. It is estimated that
in 2005 eighty per-cent of our armed forces were disqualified from
voting.
British Forces used to register for elections just once in their career,
but this was changed in 2001 by the Labour Government, who decreed the
register must be signed annually, unlike the British Muslims shooting at
them, who, having registered for a postal vote, are then entitled to it
for life.
The Ministry of Defence claimed our soldiers were notified. Not very
well though it would seem. The vast majority had no idea of the 2001
rule change, leading Lord Garden, a Lib Dem defence spokesman to
remark:“It’s rather sad that we send our military personnel off to
establish democracy and set up elections in countries like Iraq and
Afghanistan, but don’t make enough arrangements for them to vote here.”
Quite so, but Lord Garden labours under the misapprehension that we are a
fully functioning democracy rather than a discredited banana republic.
And just because our curiously silent Conservative rulers and mainstream
media appear disinterested in the death of our democracy, this does not
mean all the people are similarly apathetic.
Banana republics are inherently unstable and violent. We are already
witnessing the early stages of civil war in England, as the native EDL
square up to foreign Islam and their Communist allies. The next few
years will witness interesting developments in the art of “steam
management.”
