UK Brexit desperation and support of Saudi islamofascists and their war crimes behind poison hypocrisy
Preparing for war actions in Syria etc. before the poison question is investigated properly and while the lynching mentality UK government itself induced is still working?
Why is it that the UK government as well as most of the parliament (except Corbyn) are so keen on protecting Saudi islamofascists and demonizing Russia?
England (aka UK) now constitutes the worst security threat to EU (and to itself) because of Brexit. England wants to stir as much tensions as possibly for the purpose of keeping within EU when it comes to weapon trade and "security". England also wants to combine this with influence and arms contracts with Saudi islamofascists and other muslim countries. And in doing this England's politicians want to utilize average muslims as a means to protect the islamofascist "guardians of islam".
Dear reader, Klevius has never been to Russia and has never had any Russian friends or contacts whatsoever despite the fact that Klevius has lived much of his life not far from the Russian border. Moreover, Klevius has never been a Communist nor does he approve of many things Russia stands for, such as e.g. being "islam's best friend", violating Human Rights when it comes to sex segregation etc. (just as so many other countries also do). See e.g. what Klevius wrote about the Pussy Riots.
Thursday, August 09, 2012
OIC, the real force behind the ideological rape of the Pussy Riot
And you! Please educate yourself about Negative Human Rights and islamic Sharia slave finance during 1400 years!
To understand sex apartheid, please read What's sex segregation?!
Politicians and religians in UN, UK. US, Russia etc. sell out your Human Rights through cooperation with islamofascist Saudi based muslim OIC (all muslims Sharia steered world organization)!OIC has some 1.4 Billion muslims (most of whom have not a clue of what's going on). Some 30-40% (only 500 Millions, but still) of these muslims want Sharia. However, OIC wants to impose Sharia on EVERY MUSLIM!
What is OIC's islamofascist Sharia declaration?
Pussy Riot, Suffragettes of our time
In March 2012, during an improvised and unauthorized concert in Moscow's Cathedral of Christ the Saviour, the three women from the band were arrested and charged with hooliganism and their trial began in late July. The band members have gained sympathy both within Russia and internationally due to allegations of harsh treatment while in custody and a risk of a possible seven-year jail sentence, but have also been criticized in Russia as well for offending the feelings of religious people.
Pussy Riot's lawyers have said the circumstances of the case have revived the Soviet-era tradition of the show trial. However, a more important connection may be cold political power diplomacy, esåecially via islam, although often camouflaged with0"defense of other religions .
Religious diplomacy can be described as a state activity consisting of the use of a religious factor in foreign policy; that is, the whole set of mechanisms for state cooperation with religious associations in the pursuit of pragmatically defined national interest, use of the international activity of religious institutions, ideas and religious symbols (appropriately interpreted to comply with current political aims) and so on. It is important to emphasise pragmatism of architects of religious diplomacy for it does not depend solely on the—professed— religiosity of political elites.
Nor is religious diplomacy exclusive to theocratic states. Religious institutions (actors) and religious ideas, symbols etc. are treated in this context foremost as assets, which can be used in order to achieve political goals. However, it is not easy to draw a clear-cut line between personal convictions of an individual and his political decisions and it is practically impossible to determine if a particular act was a result of a sheer political calculation or stems—at least partly—from religious motives.
Although decisionmakers usually have at least a sentimental relationship to the given belief, this does not necessarily have to be the case—the religious factor can be used in foreign policy regardless of a decision-maker’s attitude to faith.
Klevius: All religions, but specifically islam, constitute defamation of Human Rights!
For you who have problem with this extremely simple and crystal clear logic, let me explain in plain language:
1) Weird religious/super-natural, astrological, creationist etc individual thoughts have no bearing on this topic. On the contrary, Human Rights give you the right to have whatever thoughts as long as you don't harm others.
2) All religions are collective racism and/or sexism. Some, like islam, are even totalitarian. However, whereas totalitarian islam restrticts the rights of women and other non-muslims, "totalitarian" Human Rights do the exact opposite namely defend those rights. This is why islam (OIC) could never accept Human Rights without destroying itself! And this fact together with the fact that islamic ideology has been behind the worst collective historical crime throughout 1400 years explains why islam (OIC) now is so eager to criminalize any discussion about it!