The new "deal" guarantees UK citizens living in EU all of EU's Human Rights protection, while denying all these rights* for EU citizens living in UK. Why?* Even within the proposed eight year period when UK courts "could be advised" by The European Court of Justice, there's no guarantee whatsoever.
Klevius citizenship tutorial:
European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has stated that muslim sharia isn't compatible with Human Rights. That's a problem for Britisharia, so to avoid it Theresa May had to eliminate The European Court of Justice from any involvement in UK's sharia future. However, at the same time she said UK should remain with ECHR - without mentioning how or to what extent. So how does this make sense?
It's very simple. As Klevius noted already in 1991, 1993, 1994 and 1996 (see e.g. Angels of Antichrist) ECHR applies a so called 'margin of appreciation' to its rulings, which means a "pre-judgement" whether a state party to the European Convention on Human Rights should be sanctioned for derogations. The threshold varies but is certainly much higher for a country outside EU.
The European Court of Justice - whose judgments are based on the value foundation of ECHR - is the main channel for legal issues in EU and therefore the root cause to why Theresa May so vehemently opposed it.
EU citizens can't take British citizenship without abandoning their EU citizenship.
Why? Because if you don't abandon your EU citizenship then you can be deported from UK equally easy as if you were still an EU citizen. In fact, you could be even worse off. Meaning you don't have the same rights as other citizens in England and you would no longer be even "morally" connected to the "deal".
UK - the open security hole for islamofascism
Saudi muslim war criminal and Human-rightsophobe is loved by BBC