Are you or your representative(s) for or against basic Human Rights equality?

Peter Klevius global morality can only be challenged by violating the most basic of Human Rights.

Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".

* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.

This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.

Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.


Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.


4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Racist UK Government and BBC

Racist UK Government and BBC

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Warning for a muslim robot!

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slave to Abbasid (ca 750)

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

Peter Klevius' 1986 experimental zero budget refugee video

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

The main threat to your Human Rights

The main threat to your Human Rights

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Sunday, January 8, 2017

The Arc de Triomphe - over a Saudi Wahhabi mosque?


Peter Klevius: Wouldn't France have been better off playing more with Japan and China than with islam and the islamofascist Saudi dictator family?

Charlie Hebdo Journalist Quits: Says Magazine Has Bowed Down To Islam
Zineb El Rhazoui, one of Charlie Hebdo’s most prominent journalists announced that she is leaving the magazine: “Charlie Hebdo died on January 7,”
Klevius: That must comfort BBC a lot now to compensate for when they lost to Trump despite doing their outmost to smear him with fake news and misinfor etc since the day they spotted him. But of course, they still have a woman, Marine Le Pen, to spit on. And as BBC is in love with islamofascist sharia they can hardly accuse Marine of sexism, can they.


A recent study shows 28% of French muslims follow an “authoritarian” interpretation of texts that advocate a split from French society. And more than 14 per cent of 15 to 25-year-olds believe sharia law carries more weight than that of their place of residence.


 Iyad Madani, the Saudi Fuhrer of Saudi based and steered OIC.
 

 Giulio Meotti: While the medieval Saudi system of justice was flogging the gentle blogger Raif Badawi 50 out of the stipulated 1000 lashes, a delegation of UN bureaucrats landed in Jeddah to promote an international conference on religious freedom. The Saudis use these international seats to advance their oppressive agenda, and to press the Western democracies to punish criticism of Islam. Through the shameful trial of Geert Wilders, Dutch authorities sent a message of surrender to the Saudis and other rogue Islamic regimes that punish dissent. Did the Dutch prosecute Wilders on behalf of the Saudis, who threatened to impose sanctions on the Netherlands? The UN and the Western democracies are putting the defense of human rights and freedom in the hands of one the world's worst violators of religious and intellectual freedom. Sharia courts are already fully operating in the Netherlands.


Last time fascism entered through the Arc de Triomphe it came in the form of German National Sozialism*. Today it comes from the "guardian of islam", the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (OIC in UN).

* For ignorasmuses: Socialism was born in Paris. It developed into Communism and social democracy from which National socialism later emerged.

Klevius wrote:

August 18, 2013

When Saudi blogger gets 600 lashes and 7 yrs in a Saudi prison, BBC only reports he was freed (from death sentence)

A screen dump on a Google news search today on 'BBC Raif Gadawi' gives this shameful result:



A Japanese in Paris 1984


1984 Honda Jazz, 1250 cc. It had a road holding that no similar sized/priced cars could match. This became very obvious in France that year when even much pricier cars couldn't keep up with the pace on twisty roads. Which fact gave Klevius plenty of good laughs in company with frustrated proud French drivers, desperate in their in vain effort. Yes, Klevius knows what he's talking about cause one of his good friends was a Gordini etc. maniac, and an other an Abarth (Italian) fantast who built a 4WD mud race car with two engines and gear boxes. He easily outperformed Jeremy Clarkson & Co when it comes to killing people with laughter. Try for yourself using two throttles and two manual gear boxes while participating in a fast mowing mud race. The video is fantastic. No wonder he loved to drive the Jazz for a change...

When Peter Klevius 1984 bought a new Honda Jazz 1250cc (the world's first minivan) he went to Paris for a test drive and noticed considerably more smashed cars than at home in Fennoscandia. However, after having experienced the exciting end of Champs Elysees at the  Arc de Triomphe, some hints were given (it's exactly the same still today). Klevius was almost halfway into the roundabout before he got the local driving code and managed to slip away with both mirrors intact.

But then came EU to protect outdated low quality tax payer sponsored manufacturing from those evil Japanese who wanted to sell beter cars etc. to the Europeans.


Btw, it took until 1993 before Renault introduced Europe's first minivan, the lousy Twingo. I.e. the same year EU was born for the purpose of protecting lousy European manufacturers from the superior Japanese products.



.

No comments:

Post a Comment