Klevius supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let England leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland stay. UK is an unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and lack of constitution. The preposterous "British" Brexit parody is then spiced with the government's and BBC's use of religious hate mongering etc. In summary UK is an anomaly of countries trying to be a state in a world of federal states united as countries.

Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

BBC isn't much interested in anti-semitism, homophobia etc. but uses them as an excuse for its Saudi/OIC supported "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?

* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

Theresa May and the world's most dangerous man contendently sharing sharia values

Theresa May and the world's most dangerous man contendently sharing sharia values

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

Are you or your representative(s) for or against basic Human Rights equality?

Peter Klevius global morality can only be challenged by violating the most basic of Human Rights.

Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".

* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.

This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.

Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.


Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.


4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Racist UK Government and BBC

Racist UK Government and BBC

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Warning for a muslim robot!

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slave to Abbasid (ca 750)

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

Peter Klevius' 1986 experimental zero budget refugee video

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

The main threat to your Human Rights

The main threat to your Human Rights

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Friday, July 10, 2015

Smoke rings around useless research

Dear reader, welcome to klevius science blog. Here's the first posting as a teaser.

Mental illness is still not proven to be caused by the behavior of parents nor by smoking more than average


Long time ago Klevius worked at Finland's biggest hospital for schizophrenic and mano-depressive patients. It was an isolation ward where the worst cases were held. During that time Klevius talked with all the patients whe were able to talk and carefully read through all more than 40 patient journals. What struck him was the fact that every patient had a history of clear mental illness either from their childhood (autism) or in their teens. None had suddenly become ill at adult age. Based on these findings plus the fact that Klevius grew up in a small town where some half of the visible population consisted of free going mental patients - and therefore gave him a quite good understanding of these kind of human vulnerabilities - he concluded that:

1 an absolute majority of schizophrenics and mano-depressives reveal clear signs before adulthood (even though the official diagnosis may come later). Getting these illnesses in adulthood is a tiny fraction (and often temporary) of the 1% general prevalence and could be due to virus (e.g. when giving birth) or self inflected via brain and nerve function damaging drugs etc.

2 the cause is never cultural but always biological (mostly genetic from birth or due to virus infection or a combination).

3 there is no cure to these illnesses, only medication that, if well assessed and targeted, may keep hallucinations and depressions at bay and help the individual live a normal, or at least more normal life. However, there is an enormous industry vulturing on these people. Not the least via the social state with its popular claim that "its the behavior of the parents". It's not (see the world's most important sociological paper Angels of Antichrist where Klevius deletes the lifework of Finland's perhaps most famous psychiatrist, Pekka Tienari). Becoming a "radical" muslim may well be traced back to the parents and would be an important field to study - schizophrenia and mano-depressivity may not.

Smoke ringed "science"


After analyzing almost 15,000 tobacco users and 273,000 non users and their relative rates of psychosis the "researchers" said cigarette smoking appears to increase risk.

James MacCabe, who co-led the research at King's College London's Institute of Psychiatry: "While it's always hard to determine the direction of causality, our findings indicate that smoking should be taken seriously as a possible risk factor for developing psychosis".

Klevius: Nothing could be more wrong! Your "findings" don't indicate that at all. It's you who distort your findings with your own as well as probably also your peers bias! The simple answer is that children/teens (e.g. autistic) with schizophrenic or mano-depressive tendencies are much more likely to be less socially and educationally "fluent" due to their underlying illness and therefore over represented in the outcast category that also contains less well adapted healthy children. And a well known fact is that this category always has had a higher incident of smokers than the normal (control) population.

Schizophrenia reflects abnormal dopamine fluctuations and mano-depressivity abnormal serotonin fluctuations. This fact is blurred by enemies of what they call the "dopamine hypothsis" by empty "indirect" or "direct" questionings without any real bearing at this stage before we know more.

The simplistic argument (could be applied to anything drug companies do) that drug companies have inappropriately promoted the dopamine "hypothesis" of schizophrenia as a deliberate and calculated simplification for the benefit of drug marketing, hides in fact, the very opposite, namely that it's the social state connected psychiatric mafia which makes huge money on useless "therapies" etc. that has grown even more powerful than even the biggest drug companies and their cartels. To understand this you again need to go back to Angels of Antichrist and the fact that money rolling in connection with state authority is far less controlled and far more dangerous.




Arvid Carlsson, Sweden's no 1 researcher, worked against the wishes of the social state but was saved by a private company


In 1957 (the same year Tienari made his infamous utterance about schizophrenia - see Angels of Antichrist) the Swedish scientist Arvid Carlsson was the first in the world to demonstrate that dopamine was a neurotransmitter in the brain and not just a precursor for norepinephrine. While working at the Swedish drug company Astra AB, Carlsson and his colleagues were also able to derive the first marketed selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor, zimelidine, from brompheniramine.

Arvid Carlsson developed a method for measuring the amount of dopamine in brain tissues. He found that dopamine levels in the basal ganglia, a brain area important for movement, were particularly high. He then showed that giving animals the drug reserpine caused a decrease in dopamine levels and a loss of movement control. These effects were similar to the symptoms of Parkinson's disease. By administering to these animals L-Dopa, which is the precursor of dopamine, he could alleviate the symptoms. These findings led other doctors to try using L-Dopa on patients with Parkinson's disease, and found it to alleviate some of the symptoms in the early stages of the disease. L-Dopa is still the basis for most commonly used means of treating Parkinson's disease.


For his work on dopamine, Arvid Carlsson was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. However, due to the strength of the Swedish "psycho" social state (see Klevius) and its unwillingness to accept his groundbreaking research, he got it as late as 2000 and only together with two other researcher. But the Japanes, whose social state was nowhere even close to that of Sweden, had already back in 1994 awarded him with their highest prize in science and a bigger amount of money than he got from his homeland's Nobel committee. His Japan Prize was only the 10th given and was titled: 'Discovery of dopamine as a neurotransmitter and clarification of its role in mental and motor functions and their disorders'.

No comments:

Post a Comment