Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

Are you or your representative(s) for or against basic Human Rights equality?

Peter Klevius global morality can only be challenged by violating the most basic of Human Rights.

Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".

* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.

This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.

Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.


Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.


4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Racist UK Government and BBC

Racist UK Government and BBC

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Warning for a muslim robot!

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slave to Abbasid (ca 750)

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

Peter Klevius' 1986 experimental zero budget refugee video

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

The main threat to your Human Rights

The main threat to your Human Rights

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Saturday, June 6, 2015

A muslim Coke more important than a Jew's life?

.

Some muslim women - and a non-dhimmi Jew

.

 Here is blatantly revealing moment of radical media activism, otherwise known today as “news coverage.”

Two news stories this week. In one, an American is targeted for beheading by members of the American Muslim community because the target would not adhere to the blasphemy laws under the sharia. I was the target and this was the media coverage. The NY Times covered only one of these two stories — guess which one.

    CNN’s Erin Burnett Asks Pamela Geller: Don’t You Really Relish All These Muslim Terrorists Trying to Kill You?
    “Activist says Boston beheading plot targeted her; police express doubt”
    Who is anti-Islamic activist Pamela Geller?
    Pamela Geller Calls Allegedly Being Targeted for Beheading by Terror Suspect ‘Chilling’

The other news story: a 31-year-old terror-tied Muslim woman went on social media and decried United Airlines for not giving her a can of Diet Coke in the way that she demanded — unopened. Under the hashtag #IslamophobiaIsReal she wrote: “I am sitting on a United airlines flight in the air 30,000ft above and I am in tears of humiliation from discrimination. The flight attendant asked me what I would like to drink and I requested a can of diet coke. She brought me a can that was open so I requested an unopened can due to hygienic reasons.”

A fellow passenger claims Diet Coke Muslim Tahera Ahmad is a rude liar (scroll down for their full account). Other passengers fear coming forward for fear of being publicly smeared with Islamophobe! Bigot! Racist! — even though Islam is not a race.

Heads exploded in an islamophobia-fueled frenzy in newsrooms everywhere.

The New York Times covered the Diet Coke jihad. The NY Times did not cover the beheading plot at all.
 .

OIC is a muslim extremist organization based in Saudi Arabia and steered by the Saudi islamofascist Iyad Madani. This man and his organization is islam's absolutely foremost representative of today - and the wall that Wallström hit her head against!



While islam imprisons and abuses girls/women and kills and victimizes millions, Mishal Husain proudly informs islam's victims that she doesn't think her way of life is under any kind of threat.


The islam-jihad-terror connection




Sharia (in any form) is against the most basic Human Rights. Sharia is the prerequisite for justifying muslim terror (incl. muslim mob terrorism, lynchings etc) by referring to "Allah's" will, "blasphemy" and "attacks on islam". Mishal Husain supports sharia.


 BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain doesn't respect Ramadan but rather drinks alcohol. However, she seems to enjoy the company of islamofascist sharia muslims.

 BBC-s sharia presenter Mishal Husain with her islamofascist muslim pals who share almost identical values with the Islamic State.


British muslim jihadists: Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo


    Muslim Woman Says She Faced Discrimination on United-Linked Flight, NY Times


    Islamophobia in the skies: United Airlines bans accused workerThe Guardian‎ –

    United fire attendant who told Muslim Tahera Ahmad she couldn’t have diet coke Daily Mail‎

    United Airlines apologizes to Northwestern chaplain …Chicago Tribune
    ‘There is no middle ground in racism:’ On Tahera Ahmad Fusion–Jun 4, 2015

    Muslim chaplain: Derogatory remarks made on United flight –Boston Herald
    Don’t ask for a soda can on United Airlines if you are a Muslim The Express Tribune

This became national news – the media was outraged at United Airlines. The Catholic Register declared: “Fight Islamophobia in America”.


Pamela Geller: In late December, Ahmad attended the MAS-ICNA (Muslim American Society- Islamic Circle of North America) conference, which featured prominent leaders within the global Muslim Brotherhood network.

    One month earlier, Ahmad posted a picture to Facebook of her standing next to Suhaib Webb, who is the Imam of the Islamic Society of Boston, an outfit run under the same umbrella organization as the mosque attended by Boston Marathon bombers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, and a plethora of other convicted terrorists. Webb has a demonstrated history of radical connections, including him being a close confidant of Al Qaeda mastermind Anwar al Awlaki prior to the 9/11 attacks.

    Ahmad is “well-known” to Yasir Qadhi, a cleric who she has frequently invited to speak to the student body at Northwestern. An audio tape of one of Qadhi’s sermons revealed that he once called for Muslims to wage holy war against non-Muslims. During his speech, Qadhi went on to discuss how he did not believe that the Holocaust had ever occurred.

    In April 2014, Ahmad joined an MPAC (Muslim Public Affairs Council) delegation of American Muslim women, who partnered with the White House “to host a historic forum recognizing the contributions of American Muslim women.” MPAC, like the MAS and ICNA, was originally founded by members of the Muslim Brotherhood. The group has in the past endorsed a paper that rejects the designations of Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist organizations. In 2009, the group hosted a protest where demonstrators called for the annihilation of the State of Israel.

    In 2013, she recited the Quran at the annual ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) convention. Declassified FBI documents found that the Bureau regarded ISNA as a Muslim Brotherhood front group. The FBI also found that ISNA was founded by prominent members of the global Muslim Brotherhood organization. Ahmad’s bio states that she has “supported leadership for premier Muslim organizations including [ISNA].” (more)

United’s early statement, now erased from the web, said that the flight attendant “attempted several times to accommodate Ms. Ahmad’s beverage request.” The flight attendant has been fired after the media waged jihad against United.

I expect this from the media but I will never fly United again.

    Fellow Passenger Claims Diet Coke Muslim Tahera Ahmad is a Rude Liar
    June 4, 2015 by Daniel Greenfield, FGM, June 5, 2015

    This is an anonymous account on the internet so we have no way of knowing if it’s true, but then again we have no way of knowing if Tahera Ahmad’s account is true either. And this version has a lot of details missing from Ahmad’s story.

    First, to recap.

    She cried discrimination, pointing to another passenger who had gotten an unopened beer and the supposed statement by the flight attendant that an unopened can could be used as a weapon. (While that sounds silly, a Chinese airline did experience a Muslim terror attack involving explosive liquid injected into soda cans, so the TSA isn’t food of soda cans.)

    It was a silly and petty complaint by a silly and petty person that the media swarmed around because Ahmad and her Islamist allies on Twitter spread it around with a hashtag #IslamophobiaisReal and then #UnitedforTahera . More stories were done about Tahera Ahmad’s Diet Coke ordeal than about the thousands of UK girls raped by Muslims.

    But critics early on questioned Tahera Ahmad’s tall coke tale.

    Many pointed out that they were denied full cans despite not being Muslim. Others pointed out that airlines cut costs by pouring soda cans into a cup to be able to use one can for more than one person. #Airlinebudgetcutsarereal.

    And still others noted that none of Ahmad’s fellow passengers had come forward to corroborate her story. Now someone who claims to have been there has come forward.

        I was actually on this flight on Friday evening from ORD to DCA. I have been a reader of this forum for a long time but seeing this all over the news made me sign up so I could tell you what really happened here and hopefully stop this liar in her tracks. I was sitting close enough to her to hear everything that was said.

        The flight attendant came up to the lady (I believe she even took her order first in the entire cabin as she was seated in the bulkhead 7d) and took her order.

        She ordered a coke zero and a hot green tea with a Splenda. The flight attendant handed her a full diet coke with a cup on top and then told her that the green tea would take a few minutes and she would get it to her ASAP.

        The lady said very rudely and condescending to the FA that she ordered a coke zero and basically pushed the soda back to the flight attendant. The FA said she was sorry and attempted to find a coke zero for her (which she did not have many of) and told her that she could only give her a portion of the can not the full can.

        This is when the lady in question started to freak out and told the FA “What do you think I will use this as a weapon?! Why can’t I have the whole can? I think you are discriminating against me. I need your name….” The lady just kept yelling to her “I need your name… I am being discriminated against.”

        This is when a few passengers told her to calm down and one guy told her to “shut her mouth and she is being ridiculous over a can of coke”.

        No one ever said anything anti-Muslim to her at all.

        She was the one who started screaming discrimination when she did not get what she wanted. The FA asked her numerous times if she would like anything else when the lady just basically pushed her away with a hand in her face. The lady then got onto her phone with her credit card and paid for the internet so she could start spinning this story on social media and she was never in tears. This person is a liar plain and simple and is just pulling the discrimination card.

    Now there are some specific details here. Namely the seating position of Tahera Ahmad, I’m not sure if that has been made public before, and details of what she ordered.

    Diet Coke wasn’t the issue. Coke Zero was. As had been suggested by others, the flight attendant was using a cup to be able to provide a drink to more than one person.

    The most plausible part of this is Ahmad being the one to introduce the claim that it could be used as a weapon. It sounds far more plausible than Ahmad’s version of how it happened.

    And the “I’m being discriminated against” yelling dovetails with how Tahera Ahmad has acted since. Further suspicions are raised by Ahmad’s dubious claim that the pilot apologized to her for his white privilege and her deletion of sections of her account.

    So an already ridiculous story becomes dumber. The only thing more ridiculous than Tahera Ahmad throwing a tantrum over a Diet Coke would be that she made the whole thing up.

No comments:

Post a Comment