Are you or your representative(s) for or against basic Human Rights equality?

Peter Klevius global morality can only be challenged by violating the most basic of Human Rights.

Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".

* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.

This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.

Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Racist UK Government and BBC

Racist UK Government and BBC

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Warning for a muslim robot!

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slave to Abbasid (ca 750)

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

Peter Klevius' 1986 experimental zero budget refugee video

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

The main threat to your Human Rights

The main threat to your Human Rights

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Saturday, May 23, 2015

Swedish police after being attacked by muslims throwing fire-bombs against them: "But most projectiles were just rocks"!

Is Sweden's Mona Sahlin finally getting "islamophobic"?

Tensta is one of the main sharia districts in Stockholm. Yesterday when police were called to the area they were met with rocks and molotov-cocktails (glas bottles filled with petrol and corked with a burning rug). One police car was destroyed and hundreds of molotov-cocktails were found.

However, when questioned about it, police spokes-woman Eva Nilsson said: "Reportedly there has been some rocks thrown at the police". When further pressed on the reports of fire-bombs she said: "Yes, it's confirmed - but it was mostly rocks".

Swedish Security Police (SÄPO) is overwhelmed by how big the support is for the Islamic State among Swedish muslims

Anders Thornberg, head of Säpo (Swedish Security Police, i.e. Säkerhetspolisen): If this recruiting to the Islamic State continues we won't make it. It becomes ever more accepted to sympathize with the Islamic State within certain groups. There are disturbing signs of a normalization of the rhetorics of the Islamic State.

The evil ideology that muslim parents transfer to their kids isn't "extremism" - it's islam based on the texts in the Koran and Muhammad's politics of violence!

Mona Sahlin's long road from islamophilia to "islamophobia"

Mona Sahlin, the first female leader of the Swedish Social Democratic Party in 2011 and the first since Claes Tholin in 1907 to leave that position without having served as Prime Minister of Sweden.

Here's what Klevius wrote in 2010:

Mona Sahlin being nice to one of Sweden's most dangerous islamists

Mahmoud Aldebe is the leader of the main muslim organization in Sweden. He is also the guy who called the Swedish (convert) state imam Abd al Haq Kielan (aka Leif Karlson - see Klevius criticism abt him on Naive (or hypocrite & traitor?) top imam denies women a social life outside home) "a Jew who has converted to Islam to destroy for the Muslims" and that he had also called him "Shayṭān" (Satan). Kielan, for his part, accused Aldebe of using undemocratic methods such as "threats, slander and reprisal" against critics. Here Mahmoud Aldebe, an aggressive proponent for Sharia in Sweden, is seen together with his friend Mona Sahlin, the leader of Swedish socialdemocrats.

Mahmoud Jamil al-Debe is the chairman of the Muslim Association of Sweden (Swedish: Sveriges muslimska förbund). He was previously vice chairman of the Muslim Council of Sweden (Swedish: Sveriges muslimska råd), an umbrella organization with the Muslim Association of Sweden as one of its members.

Aldebe was born in Jordan and immigrated to Sweden in the late 1970s together with his wife Ebtisam Aldebe. His wife was a candidate for the Centre Party in the 2006 Swedish parliament elections, but didn't receive enough votes to get a seat.

In 2003, Aldebe wrote a letter of appeal to then Swedish Minister for Justice Thomas Bodström, requesting a new trial for the brothers Rezkar and Dakhaz Atroshi, who were sentenced to life in prison for assisting in the murder of 19-year old Pela Atroshi in Iraqi Kurdistan in 1999. The murder was described by the court as an example of honor killing. In the letter, which Aldebe wrote on behalf of and as vice chairman of the Muslim Council of Sweden, Aldebe claimed that the brothers were innocent and that the verdict was the result of a "conspiracy" involving leading politicians, the police and the media.

In an article published in Expressen on 3 October 2005, Swedish Imam and Muslim convert Abd al Haqq Kielan wrote that Aldebe had approached him and said to him that he was "a Jew who has converted to Islam to destroy for the Muslims" and that he had also called him "Shayṭān" (Satan). Kielan further accused Aldebe of using undemocratic methods such as "threats, slander and reprisal" against critics. In the Swedish Television (Sveriges Television) documentary "The battle for the muslims" (Slaget om muslimerna) Aldebe is accused to being an islamist, intent on giving Islam an official political role in Sweden.

Mona Sahlin and the Islamic State

Previously Mona Sahlin has seemed more concerned with the well-being of the Swedish Islamic State jihadis than with that of the country's peaceful majority.

Magnus Norell, Swedish "terrorism expert": "If you want to increase recruitment for the Islamic State, it's a fantastic idea. The message is that it's okay to behave like his and when you come back, we'll fix you up with jobs, housing and therapy."

Today, however, Mona Sahlin seems to - for the first time - have seen something about the real islam, instead of the naive so called "Euro-islam". But how long will her "islamophobia" last in the politically correct Swedish "islamophilia"?

Mona Sahlin now thinks muslim jihadis should be punished as the crimilnals they really are (Klevius: What about Rohingya, Uyghur etc PC jihadis?). She also now shares the view that even muslims committing genocides ought to be jailed. However, many times it could be hard for the police to establish what returning muslims have done abroad. For that reason they should be under surveillance.

Moreover, according to Mona Sahlin, we see only those muslim jihadis who travel abroad, but we also need to recognize the many muslim jihadis in the tail around (muslim) "extremism" in Sweden. We need to stop talking about (muslim) VIP lanes and instead start talking about ways out of (muslim) extremism because they are not so many.

Klevius: Indeed, actually, there's only one - abandoning islam and its Human Rights violating sharia! Without Islamic State's and Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia islam is nothing! The very lure of islam is its original sins, racism and sexism!

Protected collective (religious or political) evil is the pathway to individual (so called "looners") evil deeds

Klevius: The only path to get rid of islam is to make the individual muslim responsible for what s/he is doing. And the moral guidance ought not be sharia but basic Human Rights (see Negative Human Rights). I.e. the same focusing on the individual as is behind the basic Human Rights. It's by hiding behind collective evilness in the form of "communities", "groups" "ethnicities", "faith" etc. that the individual gets away with her/his evilness. The world is a smörgåsbord (a Swedish word meaning 'buffet table') of (im)moral openings for evil to choose from. Only by recognizing the universal rights of other as well to be free from impositions, works as immunization against evil. This moral code is non-islamic!

No comments:

Post a Comment