The ultimate hypocrisy and bigotry
Anonymous ‘kaddu’: I grew up Muslim. I was a believer the first 26/27 years of my life. The muslim aspects of you aren’t something you can just wash away with a wudhu or two. And there are some aspects that I don’t care to wash away, and some aspects that I even appreciate. And hey! Some of my best friends are Muslim!
Klevius: And not the slightest thought to the fact that by being a "muslim" you contribute to the atrocities dine by true muslims and islam! OIC is the extremist muslim world organization that imposes sharia on your Human Rights.
Anonymous ‘kaddu’: Another factor is the external perception of me. This will remain largely muslim, given where I was born, where I grew up, and how someone who looks like me is seen, etc.
Klevius: Had no idea that muslims had a "look". Here in the free world we are taught that muslims have no general "look". Unless, of course, you masquerade yourself in some attire that is seen by the surroundings as indicating muslimhood.
Anonymous ‘kaddu’: And in this way I’m Muslim when I’m walking down the street, I’m Muslim when I’m on the subway and I’m Muslim when I’m boarding a plane. People aren’t thinking, “oh, there’s a person who once believed but now does not.” They’re thinking, “there goes a muslim.” That is if they’re thinking about it at all. When I’m boarding a plane, they’re probably thinking about it as some level. Given the number of times I get selected for “random” searches, I will assume that they do.
Klevius: Almost sounds as being picked at "random" is a reson for you to pretend to be muslim! Do consider that giving the impression of being a muslim automatically connects you to the islamic "religion". Do you get tax payers money for pretending being a muslim?
Anonymous ‘kaddu’: I could say that there is a cultural association with being “muslim.” This culture is rich and varied.
Klevius: Is it really! Isn't it rather just the traces of islamic atrocities reflected in the non-muslim cultures colonized by parasitic slavery islam.
Anonymous ‘kaddu’: The association to this cultural muslim requires no belief, faith or submission (to Allah or to whoever else). But the word has taken on more meanings, and will continue to do so. Those who submit simply have to deal with that.
Klevius: A disgusting reasoning. Are you a greedy coward who wants to eat the cake while keeping it intact! Klevius grew up in a Christian home in a country with Christian "values" and "culture". However, when Klevius was 14 he realized the utter racist and sexist non sense of the "chosen people" religions, and, without being a Marxist, also realized the non-Christian culture(s) of his homeland.In fact, after his revelation at the mature age of 14 Klevius lived in a country with no Christian culture - without moving out of the physical country! No one would think of German Autobahns as Nazi culture, would they.
Anonymous ‘kaddu’: So with this, the contradiction is no more. I am a non-believing “muslim.” I lack faith, I lack belief, and good lord, I certainly do not submit. But the muslim environment is around me. It still persists and I cannot pretend that it doesn’t.
Klevius: OIC, the Islamic State, muslim sharia racism/sexism etc are all around us, indeed. So why do you contribute to this evil?!
Saudi based OIC - and its islamofascist Saudi sharia Fuhrer Iyad Madani - constitutes islam today, and it's against the most basic of Human Rights!
First the Jews slaughtered the Canaanites, then they asked the Romans to torture and kill Jesus, and then the muslims started their jihad by slaughtering the Jews in Medina - no wonder religion seems to be the problem.
Religion isn't only the problem, religion is an impossibility in a society based on equality. What you see is a continuous adaptation of religious preaching trying to keep up with its own contradictions revealed by people's insight in the undeniable equality principle of basic Human Rights. Religion is in fact nothing else than an evil strive to make racist/sexist segregation look good.
Klevius question: Why aren't muslims ashamed of their slave raiding/trading/owning past? And of the Koranic ideology that "justifies" it - instead of excusing islam with cherry picked "new interpretations"
Muslim hypocrisy like the one expressed by BBC's Mishal Husain could be just a laugh - were it not for its connection to islamic evil. Islam has only one authority and that is muslimhood. So declaring yourself a muslim automatically adds to the "democratic" support of islamic evil.
Mishal Husain: “I don’t think my way of life is under any kind of threat."
Klevius: Well, that's because of Western Human Rights rather than islamic sharia, isn't it!
BBC-s sharia presenter Mishal Husain with her islamofascist muslim pals who share almost identical values with the Islamic State.
British muslim jihadists: Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo
The nearest to a global authority of muslimhood is Saudi based and Saudi steered OIC with its global sharia proclamation via UN against that very Human Rights declaration of 1948 that was supposed to protect us against such evil!
OIC Secretary-General Iyad Amin Madani stressed that the "Saudi governing system is based on islam, which fosters values of justice, compassion, equality, and tolerance."
Klevius: These words from this human scumbag must be some of the most hypocritical ever uttered. According to historical facts islam has been the by far worst crime against humanity throughout 1400 years. And today islam's "guardian" Saudi Arabia is the most intolerant of the world's countries and has even criminalized Human Rights.Moreover. the Saudi regime is the hate mongering mastermind behind islamic terror around the world. And while most people point to islamic "scholars" (aka clerics, imams, etc) as the driving force, Mishal Husain asks these muslim "scholars" to contribute even more.
Ask your muslim friend if s/he supports Saudi based OIC and its Sharia against Human Rights! If s/he doesn't then s/he is an apostate (i.e. committing the worst "crime" known to islam) and ought to be welcomed by every non-muslim
Sharia is the religious password for racism and sexismKlevius wrote:
Sunday, April 19, 2015
Jewish-muslim cooperation for British sharia islamofascism and a social state feeding itself rather than the broad public
Does it really help Jews to cooperate with the ideology that started with the genocidal slaughtering of all the Jews in Medina?
Ed Miliband is the son of Polish immigrant parents. His mother, Marion Kozak, is a Polish Jew who survived the Holocaust thanks to being protected by Poles. His father, Ralph Miliband, was a Belgian-born Polish Jewish Marxist academic who fled with his father to England during World War II.
Rochdale is notorious for its muslim sex predators abusing white British girls taken into "care" by the social state.
Wednesday, April 22, 2015
Klevius suggestion to British voters: Demand the parasites out from the public sector before you give the social state access to even more of your tax money!Unlike private companies the social state has no protection against internal parasites/parasitism. Whereas private companies have to make profit and hence forced to cut out non-functioning or parasitic elements, the social state has no such pressure. On the contrary it not only lobbies its own legislation. It's also an authority of that legislation while living on an unfounded reputation of doing good just because they themselves call it so. It's like most charities. Overwhelmingly research on the topic shows that the social state doesn't live up to its reputation (read some of Klevius research referred to below).
The UK Deputy Prime Minister, Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg, said public sector workers deserved to know there was "light at the end of the tunnel" following years of pressure on their wages since 2010.
Under the proposals pay would go up in line with CPI inflation until 2017-18, before above-inflation rises in the following two years.
"Despite being asked to make do with less, workers in the public sector have maintained the highest standards and shown great professionalism."
The Lib Dem leader thanked public sector workers, and revealed that £12b was saved as a result of "pay restraint", adding that they had "done their bit to help get the country back on track."
Under the plans, all public sector workers would receive a pay rise.
The disgusting face of the social state
Joyce Thacker has been a central figure in the responsibility for letting children be abused and even murdered. How much does she get from your tax money, and will she be rewarded in the usual way for defending islam while not defending of children.
However, she seems not very visible on Google News despite the biggest sex slave shock ever in Britain happened under her watch!?
To get a theoretical background to this please read what Klevius wrote some 20 years ago (Angels of Antichrist in the social state - the most important sociological paper written in the last century) and a decade ago (Pathological symbiosis in the social service).
Also consider The Swedish girl problem.
However, what you really should give a serious thought is why Joyce Thacker is defended?
The now reported over 1400 child (young girls "rescued" from their families by the social state) sex slaves taken and abused lately by British muslims is just a tiny glare from the tip of the iceberg. And although it's common and accepted all over the muslim world, in Western countries it's protected under the "islamophobia" slogan.
It's not islam! Really? So muslim jihadists, and muslim sex offenders just happen to follow the text in the Koran and the historical origin of islam in this respect?