Klevius doesn't share almost anything with the political views of Sverigedemokraterna (SD), which in essence is a socialdemocratic party - except for their islam criticism. And that fact alone tops all other political issues!
Rinkeby used to have a police station which failed to operate there and then was transformed to "cultural center". However, it is now also burned down.
Swedish muslims copy the behavior of Mohammed when he robbed caravans
Rinkeby is one of the parts of Stockholm with a huge support for sharia laws and the Islamic State. Swedish police have no say in the area and now also the
big multi-national Schenker transport company has stopped their deliveries to this Swedish muslim ghetto.
Recently two Schenker drivers have been threatened and badly assaulted in Rinkeby by muslim youth who surrounded the truck, stole items and threw stones after the escaping drivers. Older muslims seem to have supported the youth.
After three attempted deliveries had failed - the last despite extra security guards and police assistance DB Schenker decided to stop all deliveries to the area.
Rinkeby muslims from the Islamic Cultural Center (sic) attacking women in a Women's Network manifestation. Kvinnors nätverk.
Like in most other muslim communities Rinkeby is part of a mafia like islamic system where tax payers money is eagerly given away and used for completely other reasons than expected. Someone uses funds for a pre-school to build a personal palace in Dubai. Others transfer them to muslim terrorist activities etc.
And this disgusting supporter of islamofascism now leads the most disgusting ever Swedish smear campaign against a democratic political party - only because it criticizes islam.
Here-s what Klevius wrote March 25 2014:
Klevius question: How come that BBC (world leading media) and Aftonbladet (Scandinavia leading media) both completely miss the world's biggest fascist organization and its new Fuhrer against Human Rights?When do we start checking for the oil leaks in these fascism supporting media engines?!
Klevius suggestion: Dear reader, do contemplate the real meaning of this world wide media deception!
Aftonbladet has with all its media power relentlessly doped its reader about Sweden's only islam critical party Sverigedemokraterna (SD) - to an extent that the party is now about to fall in pieces because a split on its view on islam. Or put in other words, Aftonbladet's extreme demonizing of islam critics, which Aftonbladet call 'islam haters', has opened up for not only general disgust but also physical violence against SD-members - in short the same tactics as used by Hitler, Pol Pot etc.
But I've got a muslim friend - don't generalize all muslims and all islam!Klevius answer:
Ask your muslim friend if s/he supports OIC and its Sharia against Human Rights!
At this point you really also need to re-check your
Then ask her/him why s/he is against Human Rights for all! That will force your friend to either abandon islam or reveal that s/he is an islamofascist!
And finally a warning to all girls/women falling in love with a muslim boy/man: Your basic Human Rights are doomed if he is a real muslim and Sharia marries you!
BBC's muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain now gets her disgustingly racist/sexist islamofascist Sharia law implemented in Britain - bit by bit. But why doesn't she want to talk about this first important step and its real consequences?! As a taxpayer and payer of BBC's compulsory fees every Brit should pose that question!
Under ground-breaking guidance which would be recognised by UK courts, produced by The Law Society, High Street solicitors will, in a first real Sharia step, be able to write islamic wills that deny women an equal share of inheritances and exclude unbelievers altogether. The documents will also prevent children born out of wedlock or adopted, from being counted as legitimate heirs. Anyone married in a church, or in a civil ceremony, could be excluded from succession under Sharia, which recognise only islamic marriage.
Baroness Cox, a cross-bench peer leading a Parliamentary campaign to protect girls/women from religiously sanctioned discrimination, including UK Sharia courts in Britain: It's deeply disturbing. This violates everything that we stand for. It would make the Suffragettes turn in their graves.
Klevius question: Who are 'we' in 'everything that we stand for'. Does it include BBC's islamofascist Sharia presenter Mishal Husain?!
To be honest Klevius feels a little nostalgic of the demise of the "Sharia-is-no-threat-but-only-the-fantasies-of-islamophobes" idiots from the crew of funny Sharia clowns but as the world's foremost expert on sex apartheid (and therefore also islam) Klevius has to take responsibilty for what these idiots have already caused and may cause in the future.
Is this the last of the "Sharia-is-no-threat-but-only-the-fantasies-of-islamophobes" idiots?
Michael Smerconish (a Philly "Sharia-is-no-threat-but-only-the-fantasies-of-islamophobes" idiot): How ironic that when Susan Jarema questioned Sohail Mohammed's nomination (as a US judge), she was particularly concerned about whether he would defend the rights of women when under sharia law. I doubt she'd have anticipated how he'd rule in a domestic dispute between an unmarried couple over who could be present in a delivery room.
Klevius: How idiotic that Michael Smerconish didn't notice that neither of them were muslims! Had the man been a muslim in a simple Sharia liason (do you know how simple Sharia "marriage" can be?), then the woman's right had ABSOLUTELY NOT been recognized by "judge"* Mohammed - or, alternatively, judge Muhammed would have become an apostate in no time at all!
And how idiotic that Michael Smerconish (and his dhimmidiotic-alikes)
An other tragic dhimmidiot: What point does it make to say a person is a Christian, Muslim, Jew, Atheist if they do something wrong?
Klevius: The point is whether s/he does it because of religion! Simple as that. Yes, I know I made your day. Btw, Atheists are the only ones without an excusing ideology!
United Kamikaze Islam Protectors
Nigel Farage's (UKIP leader) pledge that he was proud UKIP politicians could "say what they like" lasted all of around 30 minutes at the party's spring conference, with panicked organisers apparently attempting to remove six journalists from a party debate on Sharia law. Journalists from the Financial Times, Bloomberg and the Telegraph were among those told they could not stay in the half-full conference room in Torquay for the party debate on the use of Islamic law in Britain. Jim Pickard, the Financial Times' political correspondent, said he and his fellow journalists had refused to leave when asked to by party staff.