Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

Are you or your representative(s) for or against basic Human Rights equality?

Peter Klevius global morality can only be challenged by violating the most basic of Human Rights.

Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".

* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.

This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.

Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.


Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.


4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Racist UK Government and BBC

Racist UK Government and BBC

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Warning for a muslim robot!

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slave to Abbasid (ca 750)

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

Peter Klevius' 1986 experimental zero budget refugee video

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

The main threat to your Human Rights

The main threat to your Human Rights

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Sunday, June 15, 2014

Sensibel people out there - here's the ultimate proof of how BBC (and its muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain) deliberately misinforms you right now in the service of Saudi Arabian islamofascism!

This is how BBC doesn't inform you about the world's most dangerous man - and an ongoing evil repetition of the origin of islam, the worst ideological crime ever against humanity!

'Iyad Madani', the Fuhrer of the world's biggest muslim organization, OIC, gets 216 hits on Google News today. However,


'Iyad Madani BBC' gives no result at all.




And this is while Saudi backed ISIS spread jihad terror over the Levant!


While islam and the Saudis mass murder Shia muslims in Iraq. Will we see "king" Abdullah in the International Criminal Court soon?!

Were most German Nazis moderate Nazis? Like allegedly most muslims are moderate muslims - despite Erdogan's claim that there is no moderate islam?!

How does being a muslim without taking responsibility for one's ideology differ from being a German without taking responsibility for National-socialism (Nazism)? Even an extremely cautious estimate reveals that muslims have murdered, tortured, enslaved, raped and terrorized multiple times that of the Germans. And still ticking...




The Saudi islamofascist Iyad Madani is the Fuhrer of the world's most powerful muslim Sharia organization (Saudi based OIC which via a scumbag muslim voting bloc in UN has made EVERY muslim a Sharia-muslim and made the most basic Human Rights a criminal offense wherever Sharia rules). Saudi Arabia is behind the racist sectarian slaughtering and sexist Sharia oppression of people not only in the Mideast but all over the world. And BBC and Mishal Husain are accomplices to this. There was a time when naive muslims and Westerners thought one could be a muslim without Human Rights violating Sharia. Not so anymore. So what they now do is to propose "moderate Sharia". However, the violation of the most basic of Human Rights can never be moderate!




The naive urban PC myth that Bush's Iraq war caused islamic terror in Iraq seems  to have at least a 4-10 year deficit - and the real culprits and their disgusting ideology are still at large




Saudi-backed infiltration has been going on since the early 1990s, from the Balkans to the borders of China


ISIS is former Ansar al-Islam.

Mouaz Moustafa, executive director of the Syrian Emergency Task Force, a Syrian-American organization that supports the opposition: '[The extremist groups] are the most well-resourced on the ground…'.



Klevius comment: How come that evil always gets most of the funds?

2008 Klevius wrote:

The root man of Saudi islamofascism was Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab who, during his studies in Basra in the 18th C, got seriously dazzled by glimpses of the European Enlightenment twinkling through the temporary crack to the West called the "Tulip period". He then retreated back into his medieval islamic darkness & as a result, came to position himself as the very opposite to the British "Glorious revolution" which fought against Catholic papacy, & which ended up in Lancashire's coal fueled textile industries as the beginning of the modern industrialized* world based on technology & rationality rather than on religious superstition & fundamentalism (also compare Shinto vs islam). A major outcome of industrialization was universal suffrage & the idea about negative human rights.
* isn't it an irony then that Britain, who started the series of modern revolutions as well as industrialization, came to deeply embed itself with the most intolerant, racist & sexist constitution, i.e. the Saudi islamofascist state which was incapable of producing anything by itself except hatred & more fanatic muslims!

Together with the criminal "house of Saud" Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab then confined the Arabs in islamic backwardness &, in addition, the Arab women in an islamic burka of extreme Sharia sex segregation/apartheid.

After having robbed Mecca & Medina, the Sauds/Wahhabis run the stolen country by the help of what they fleeced from visiting pilgrims. This was the main source of income until Westerners found/drilled oil & made the lazy islamist looters even wealthier.


From the beginning of the Iraq liberation, the Kurds expressed fear of Saudi Wahhabi jihadist penetration. They reported Saudi Wahhabi desecration of cemeteries--always an early sign of the Saudi-backed infiltration that has been going on since the early 1990s, from the Balkans to the borders of China.

An individual calling himself Mullah Krekar (aka Najmuddin Faraj Ahmad, born 07/07/1955 in Iraqi Kurdistan), religious mentor of the terrorist group Ansar al-Islam, which first operated in Kurdistan and then moved to the Sunni Triangle, has declared that he was proud to be described as a disciple of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, founder of Saudi islamofascism.

Mullah Krekar was the original leader of the islamist armed group Ansar al-Islam, which was set up and commenced operations in Kurdistan while he had refugee status in Norway.

In 1991, after the first Gulf War, when Saddam Hussein oppressed, gassed and pursued the Kurds in Northern Iraq, Mullah  Krekar fled to Norway. From there he continued his relations with islamic militants in the Middle East and especially in Jordan and Iraq.

In Iraq Mullah  Krekar founded in 1999 Ansar al Islam organization with Abu Musab al Zarqawi, with whom he had contact since 1994. Through the cell of Abu Musab al Zarqawi in Amman Jordan, Jordanian intelligence found evidence to his involvement in the Jordanian millennium plot scheduled to the 2000 new years eve.

In 2002 Mullah  Krekar visited the Kurdish autonomy in Northern Iraq.

After the arrest of Jamal Zougam, one of the main offenders that carried out the Madrid Trains Bombing on 3/11/2004, Jamal Zougam revealed in his investigation that between 1999 – 2001, he traveled several times to Oslo, Norway, to meet Mullah  Krekar for “spiritual guidance”.

The name of Mullah  Krekar emerged so many times in the activities of Ansar al Islam, the most dangerous islamic network in Europe, and in connection with so many muslim terrorist cells in Europe and the Middle East, that it is impossible to assume that Mullah  Krekar is innocent from harboring terror.

Mullah Krekar is an example of shrewd manipulation of the judicial system by islam supporters.

The US had Islamic State of Iraq and al-Shams (ISIS) leader Abu Bakr al Baghdadi in custody at a detention facility in Iraq, but muslim born (apostate?!) Mr X "president" Barry Barack Barakeh Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) freed him. Al Baghdadi was among the prisoners released in 2009 from the U.S.'s now-closed Camp Bucca near Umm Qasr in Iraq.

But now five years later he is leading the army of ruthless extremists bearing down on Baghdad who want to turn the country into an Islamist state by blazing a bloody trail through towns and cities, executing Iraqi soldiers, beheading police officers and gunning down innocent civilians.

al Baghadadi, aka Abu Duaa, was an islamic fundamentalist long before the U.S. invaded Iraq and he became a leader in al Qaeda's network before he was arrested and detained by American forces in 2005.

'Abu Duaa was connected to the intimidation, torture and murder of local civilians in Qaim,' according to a 2005 U.S. intelligence report.

'He would kidnap individuals or entire families, accuse them, pronounce sentence and then publicly execute them.'

The Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS), act in coordination with Saddam Hussein's former Baathists.

Western and Arab countries have happily supported ISIS and other muslim terrorist groups.

The muslim terrorists have now become owners of a territory.

However, terrorists such as ISIS cannot control large territories on their own but need others supporting them.


ISIS is attempting to take over Sunni-populated regions with the help of local forces so that it can control activities on the border of Syria and Iraq hence facilitating attacks against Iraq and weaken the Shiite-dominated government in Baghdad.

ISIS will probably negotiate similarly as the Taliban have done.

Muslim Wahhabi clerics/muftis in Saudi Arabia have heavily inspired the bloodshed produced by muslim jihadi groups in Iraq and Syria. ISIS islam interpretation is hence a Wahhabi one spiced with the usual inevitable takfirism, i.e. sectarian racism. Islam rests on racism on multiple levels due to its original formula that has nothing to do with good governance but everything to do with being an ideological AK-47 for parasitism.

Islam is therefore all about racist hate and sexism (sex slaves and reproduction of as many muslim males as possible). Except for the default islamic state of eternal hate and contempt of the "infidel" and the takfirs (wrong muslims), Saudi Sunni muslims especially hate Shia muslims, and teach others to hate them as well. This hatred is inherited from the very origin of islam and has to do with islamic (Arabic)language imperialism. So it's not at all just Saudi Arabia vs. Iran but a purely religious feature of islam. In fact, as Klevius has said since 9/11, the very origin and core of islam is tailored for parasitism, greed, looting and rapetivism. After the islamic conquest of the Sassanid Empire, during the reign of the Ummayad dynasty, the Arab muslim attackers/looters tried to impose Arabic as the primary language of the subject peoples throughout their empire.

In 2006, al-Qaeda blew up the al-Askari mosque, sparking a new civil war between Shiites and Sunnis in Iraq.

The only way to stop the spread of islamic terrorism is to stop Saudi Arabia. However, Mr X "president" will never do that. Even now he wants to help the Saudis while talking about giving military aid to the Iraqis.

The islamofascist Saudi dictator family hides its dirty game behind "private donors" etc.

Pictures of Saddam Hussein and his commander Essat al-Douri have been posted in the streets by ISIS.

Khamenei blames Saudi Arabia, Qatar for Iraq insurgents

Armed groups like the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) are leading to a debate on Salafism in Saudi Arabia because although they do Saudi business they also may constitute a threat to the dictatir family itself.

Saudi Salafism shares with ISIS the islamic fanatism of Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn al-Qaim and Mohammad ibn Abdel Wahhab.


Does the islamic Sharia rule include all people or is it limited to influential muslim figures and muslim dictators (Ahl al-Hal wal Aqad)?

However, political Salafism cannot establish a system of rule that can be held accountable, as it bans and criminalizes all forms of opposition, criticism and protest against authority. Despite the differences among Salafist movements from jihadist Salafism to Saudi government loyalists Jamia Salafism, they all refuse and criminalize opposition to authority.

Salafist political theory is a mess of contradictory sayings of Sharia fanatics from the Middle Ages. Some sayings forbid resistance and protests, while others consider criticizing power a religious duty. What makes either of both opinions prevalent and dominant during a certain era is the power and influence of those who believe in it.

Issues of Sharia rule and democracy and their relation to islam in the Arab Spring countries worries Saudi Arabia. The Syrian jihad terror and the chance it gave to jihadist Salafism has prompted many questions regarding theories of authority in islam.

Saudi "king" Abdullah, with his policy of delivering blows against Iran by orchestrating the overthrow of Assad in Syria and Malik in Iraq, shows no pity for the bloodshed he causes. Nor do his supporters, including such apart figures as Mr X "president" muslim born (apostate?!) Barry Barakeh Hussein Mohammad Obama Dunham Soetoro (or whatever) and BBC's muslim Sharia presenter Mishal Husain etc.

Militarily Saudi Arabia's first public display of Chinese missiles capable of hitting Tehran has to be added to Obama's and UK's selling of huge amounts of expensive sophisticated military equipment and weapon systems to this (except for oil/gas) extremely backward and evil nation that in no way could have produced this technology by the hackward islam they embrace for the sake of doing evil and violating Human Rights.

However, ISIS is the ruthless muslim killing machine, that takes Sunni hate of Shiites to its logical, and bloody, extreme.

Saudi "king" Abdullah's main goal is, using his own words, "cutting off the head of the snake" in Tehran.

The Sunni/Shiite divide coincides approximately with the division between Arabs and Persians, now and historically.

Saudi Arabia's dilemma is rooting for muslim ISIS terrorism while avoiding its advances at home.

Already in the 1920s, Muslim Brotherhood fighters were helping Ibn Saud to conquer Arabia for the Saud family (which had come to wealth by using African slaves on their dade plantations in truly islamic tradition). Ibn Saud, the father of Saudi "king" Abdullah, asked the British to use their air force to weaken the the Muslim Brotherhood jihadists who had also attacked the Brits. Ibn Saud then used his own muslim jihadists to massacre them at Sabilla in 1929.


Btw, where are all the world's 1.5 Billion muslims who should need to follow Klevius' blog? What keeps them away?! If they need collected info digested via an unbiased Atheist (not chained by prejudicial "god" thoughts) top brain and interpreted against what we historically know about islam - there seems to be few options.
Stop being a coward muslim! Become a brave ex-muslim! You too Mishal Husain - if your muslim husband allows you to.


Dear reader, sorry for not editing this (and most other) posting properly - but as long as you don't contribute with anything Klevius cannot employ an editor. And you know, Klevius doesn't want to waste his life on editing this - isn't it more than enough that he produces this info for you! And why does Klevius bother doing even this? Well, simply because his Atheist moral is entirely resting on basic Human Rights and equality. And as he continuously sees how stupidity paves the way for evil immoral (Human Rights violation) by racist/sexist elements, he feels morally obliged to do at least this. If not for anything else than his own peace of mind.

No comments:

Post a Comment