Klevius supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let England leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland stay. UK is an unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and lack of constitution. The preposterous "British" Brexit parody is then spiced with the government's and BBC's use of religious hate mongering etc. In summary UK is an anomaly of countries trying to be a state in a world of federal states united as countries.

Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

BBC isn't much interested in anti-semitism, homophobia etc. but uses them as an excuse for its Saudi/OIC supported "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights.

Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?

* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Politicians against people

Politicians against people

Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

Theresa May and the world's most dangerous man contendently sharing sharia values

Theresa May and the world's most dangerous man contendently sharing sharia values

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

Are you or your representative(s) for or against basic Human Rights equality?

Peter Klevius global morality can only be challenged by violating the most basic of Human Rights.

Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".

* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.

This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.

Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.


Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.


4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Racist UK Government and BBC

Racist UK Government and BBC

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Warning for a muslim robot!

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slave to Abbasid (ca 750)

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

Peter Klevius' 1986 experimental zero budget refugee video

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

The main threat to your Human Rights

The main threat to your Human Rights

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Thursday, May 15, 2014

Islam is today Human Rights violating Saudi Arabia (OIC) and its Salafist terror organizations around the world. And you can't do anything about it unless you subscribe to secular and universal Human Rights!




These women are fascists if they oppose Universal Human Rights and propose apartheid and sex slavery (Sharia)! Or are they just that stupid - or misled by their menfolk?!


Klevius says islam smears Human Rights!


Islam and Saudi Arabia made Boko Haram's* atrocities possible


The faith world in general (plus some remaining "third world" inferiority complex) is the main reason medieval backward islam is still allowed to exist. We don't allow National Socialist German Workers' Party** (called Nazism by socialists so to cover the socialist roots) either, do we! Btw, the socialist roots are clearly visible in their 25 points program (shown furthest down on this posting).



Is this man the world's most evil? His organization certainly is because it criminalizes the most basic of Human Rights, hence opening up for racist and sexist attacks around the whole world!


This is Iyad Madani, the Saudi Sharia fanatic Fuhrer of all the world's muslims' world organization, the Saudi based OIC. Its main objective is and has always been to violate Human Rights and to replace them worldwide with Sharia. This means that the most basic of Human Rights are criminalized in islam because they are against racist/sexist islamofascist Sharia. Got it!

Saudi initiated, Saudi based, and Saudi steered OIC (islam) was created as a bulwark against Universal Human Rights because islam is not possible if it has to remove its racism and sexism in accordance with Human Rights.

The most disastrous tipping point was when OIC managed to turn UN from a bastion for the defense of Universal Human Rights into its very opposite, namely in practice an islamic mosque (OIC now constitutes the biggest voting bloc within UN) based on Sharia (via the so called Cairo declaration on "human rights in islam").  

In Saudi Arabia a woman can earn a phd in Sharia islam while still remaining equally oppressed as the women at the alleged Mohammed's medieval time!


60% of university students in Saudi Arabia are women but almost all of them are then functioning  as Sharia teachers of girls to become obedient muslim Saudi sex slaves women (also compare the fate of the evil Saudi "king's" daughters). 85% of employed Saudi women work in (girl's) education, and 95% in the "public sector" mainly as Sharia guardians of girls and other women. The first group of women graduated from a law (Sharia) program in 2008 but they are not able to practice law, but 'possibly' work in courts to Sharia "assist" other women.

A few years ago an "expert on girls' education" (Sharia), Nora bint Abdullah al-Fayez, became the first female minister in Saudi Arabia. She was made deputy education minister in charge of a new Sharia department for female students.


The dirty bigoted and hypocritical thinking of Saudi Arabia's top cleric


Sheikh Abdulaziz Al al-Sheikh, Saudi Arabia’s grand mufti opens his bigoted and hypocritical mouth about Boko Haram: “These groups are not on the right path because Islam is against kidnapping, killing and aggression,” he said. “Marrying kidnapped (muslim) girls is not permitted.”

Klevius: No, it isn't. But enslaving infidels is ok. And no matter if you are an infidel or a muslim girl, you will be lawfully raped under Sharia. Either in accordance to the Koran's statement of 'what your right hand possesses', or in accordance to the lack of domestic rape in Sharia.

In 2012, Sheikh Abdulaziz Al al-Sheikh issued a fatwa allowing ten year old girls to marry insisting that girls are ready for marriage by age 10 or 12: "Our mothers and grandmothers got married when they were barely 12. Good upbringing makes a girl ready to perform all marital duties at that age."

Sheikh Abdulaziz Al al-Sheikh also announced plans in 2007 to demolish the Green Dome and flatten the tombs housed under it, including the alleged but not existing one of Muhammad.

In 2012, Sheikh Abdulaziz Al al-Sheikh declared that, "All churches in the Arabian Peninsula must be destroyed". Abdulaziz bin Abdullah cited an Islamic hadith quoting the Prophet Mohammed on his deathbed. However, most of the world overlooked the statement. Mehmet Görmez, the most senior imam in Turkey, saide that the announcement totally contradicted the peaceful teachings of islam. Görmez said that the mufti’s declaration ran "contrary to islamic teachings of tolerance".

Klevius: What peaceful teachings of islam?!

The sheikh has now ruled that further church building should be banned and existing Christian houses of worship should be destroyed.Archbishop Robert Zollitsch, chairman of the German Bishops Conference, said the mufti "shows no respect for the religious freedom and free co-existence of religions", especially all the foreign laborers who made its economy work.

Saudi Arabia bans all non-Muslim houses of prayer, forcing Christians there to risk arrest by praying in private homes. There are churches for Christian minorities in the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman and Yemen.
However, the Saudi "king" Abdullah (Obama's first call as "president") plans to open a controversial centre for interfaith islam diamonologue in Austria.

"How could the grand mufti issue a fatwa of such importance behind the back of his king?" stupid bishops asked. "We see a contradiction between the dialogue being practiced, the efforts of the king and those of his top mufti."

Klevius explanation: So, you don't seem to realize what is said in OIC's Human Rights violating Sharia declaration: Reaffirming the civilizing and historical role of the Islamic Ummah which Allah made as the best community ---  in accordance with the Islamic Shari'ah. - Everyone shall have the right to advocate what is right, and propagate what is good, and warn against what is wrong and evil according to the norms of Islamic Shari'ah.


Background to the continuing survival of barbaric islam and its Human Rights violating Sharia


Muslim countries aided by some other Human Rights violating countries criticized the Universal Declaration of Human Rights for its perceived "failure" to take into account the cultural and religious context of "non-Western" (read non-Human Rights) countries.


BBC's muslim sharia presenter Mishal Husain didn't even mention the real problem in Nigeria namely islamic sharia and that the hate crimes against non-muslims are committed under the sharia umbrella in the muslim majority north of Nigeria. Boko Haram is supported by muslim leaders and therefore more or less out of reach for the government's actions. Nothing about this in Mishal Husain's reporting. Could a journalist and a media company sink any lower.

Klevius: When islam started its enslavement campaign in Africa and elsewhere the main pattern was to bribe local leaders to become muslim slave traders. This is what is behind stupid historians references to 'local people welcomed the muslim invasions'.

BBC: But also muslims have been targeted in Nigeria.

Klevius: No "real" muslims have been targeted at all because Boko Haram follow exactly OIC's (Saudi) Sharia. It was no coincidence that muslim girls "managed to escape" whereas non-muslims did not. Only difference that the Saudis do it via the (dictator) state. Remember the barbaric and extremely intolerant laws against non-muslims in Saudi Arabia. And their bigot and hypocrite top imam who has asked for the destruction of all churchers and other non-islamic buildings and organizations, now pretends to condemn Boko Haram. Disgusting.

BBC: Islam is against forceful conversion.

Klevius: Not at all, islam is all about forceful conversion - except for them it wants to enslave. And in front of the "islamic world", the family, the society, the islamic state or whatever other means, a girl has no say of her own. There simply doesn't exist a Sharia version on this planet that would allow a muslim woman to marry a non-muslim man! Just to mention one of an endless pile of Human Rights violations emanating from evil islam.


A Nigerian voice on Boko Haram


Femi Fani-Kayode: Three years ago I called on the Federal Government to level any city or community that hosted, provided refuge or supported Boko Haram and many not only insulted me but also said that I was far too extreeme. At that time, whilst the doves continued to call for dialogue and understanding with and for Boko Haram I saw them exactly for what they were- evil islamist forces that had foreign-backing and a frightful agenda for our country which was not hidden. I also said that they would never stop until that agenda was effected or until they were utterly crushed and every single one of them was wiped out together with all traces of their evil philosophy. As usual most Nigerians did not understand at the time and they subjected me to all manner of insults. Yet I continued and I warned that if all these things were not done the situation would get far worse. Sadly, three years down the line, I have been proved right.

How did I know? Because I am a student of history and because what Boko Haram is attempting to do is nothing new. It has happened in many other countries over the ages and in those countries the people themselves were forced to make a hard choice- to either fight the evil or to succumb to it and allow it to overwhelm them.

Those that encouraged the Boko monster and fed the islamist beast at the outset and that silently supported and encouraged them in an attempt to destabilise the government and the nation have now become a victim of that hideous monster themselves.

Let us make no mistake about it: the agenda of Boko Haram and those that are behind it, both locally and their international backers, is not limited to northern Nigeria and neither has it ever been. Simply put they wish to conquer the whole country and establish their own caliphate. They wish to impose their strange values and barbaric beliefs on the rest of us by force. There are some leaders in Nigeria, backed by Al Qaeda, the Taliban, Al Shabab and emboldened by Arab money and salifist philosophies, that honestly believe that if Nigeria is not ruled by a northern muslim then there must be no peace or there must be no Nigeria at all

As far as they are concerned it would be better to establish a pre-historic islamic fundamentalist state, like the old Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, where full sharia law is practised and where Boko Haram leads and holds sway, than to have a modern-day secularist Nigerian state where a southern or northern christian or a moderate muslim rules. The underlying philosophy is that some were ”born to rule” and if ”they” cannot rule then they will use ”their” religion and ”their” considerable financial and political arsenal to ”make Nigeria ungovernable”. This is evil and we must resist it. I can never support such an agenda, such a philosophy or such people because as far as I am concerned they are of the devil.

Those that think like that and that espouse such views are worse than the white supremacist Boers of South Africa during the days of aparthied and they are worse than than the fascists of Nazi Germany under Hitler. I believe, and I have always believed, that if Nigeria is to remain one then ALL her ethnic nationalities must be treated as equals, no matter how big or how small, and that the secularity of the state must be preserved. I have always believed that we must keep religion out of politics and that faith, being essentially a personal matter, must never be used as a political tool or as a weapon of destabilisation. Evidently not all share my view. Some believe that religion and ethnicity can and must be used as a means to achieve and preserve political power. Worst still others believe that islamic fundamentalism has a place in our country.

They must either fight this evil called Boko Haram or submit and capitulate to it. They must either insist on a modern-day secular state where all are equal before the law and are protected by the constitution or they accept the violent imposition of the most cruel and barbaric form of an islamic fundamentalist state.


An amazingly stupid defender of the most disastrous of ideologies


Qasim Rashid (a nut head muslim on Fox): The ultimate test asks how well these teachings have played out in Islamic and world history. In one word—amazingly.

Klevius: Indeed. Islam managed during 1,400 years to be the ideology that has committed most slavery, genocides and rapetivism of all! By far! And a quick look at the islamic "world" map proves islam's disastrous effect on everything it has touched upon. Without Western abolishment, technology and oil nothing would be left. Just look at how the Ottoman slave empire sunk into the deepest misery after slavery was forbidden. The Ottoman slave empire's blood was that of its slaves.

Qasim Rashid (a nut head muslim on Fox): Prophet Muhammad’s wife Khadija was not only the first person to accept his claim to prophethood, she ran a thriving trade business as a CEO during his lifetime. She was a leader, an entrepreneur, a mother, and a wife—all in one.

Klevius: How come then that Khadiha was a prosperous CEO and run a thriving trade business BEFORE Mohammed and islam?!


A muslim "human rights lawyer" - the most laughable of oxymorons?


CNN's Arsalan Iftikhar (adjunct professor  imam at of religious studies at DePaul University in Chicago): As a Muslim human rights (sic) lawyer, it is obscene and absolutely un-Islamic for these lunatic human traffickers to invoke the name of God while kidnapping young girls and threatening to sell them into sexual slavery.

Klevius: As a muslim you can NOT be a Human Rights lawyer, only a sharia lawyer. This unchangable fact isn't altered by OIC (all muslims Saudi based and led world organization) calling sharia "islamic human rights"! So either Arsalan Iftikhar blatantly lies you straight up in your face or he is no muslim at all!

Arsalan Iftikhar: The leaders of Boko Haram have clearly never read the Holy Quran, which states quite clearly that “oppression is worse than murder” (2:191) and that nobody “shall force girls to commit prostitution” (24:33).

Klevius: The leader happens to be educated in islamic monotheism at a renowned university. I think he knows exactly what he is doing according to the Koran and Sharia. He actually gives us a modern copy of Mohammed to study!

Arsalan Iftikhar: They must have also missed the numerous times that the Prophet Muhammad categorically stated during his life that women or children were never to be harmed under any situation.

Klevius: No, because they should be used as sex slaves! Btw, by converting to islam Sharia makes it criminal for a woman to marry a non-muslim! This is just one of the "secrets" behind islam's "popularity".

Daniel Greenfield: Mohammed partly financed the expansion of Islam by enslaving and selling girls and women. Boko Haram in Nigeria is following in the way of their prophet by kidnapping and selling hundreds of non-Muslim schoolgirls.

    Qur’an (33:50) – “O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those (slaves) whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee”

This is Islam.

    Fears for the fate of more than 200 Nigerian girls turned even more nightmarish Monday when the leader of the Islamist group that kidnapped them announced plans to sell them.

    “I abducted your girls. I will sell them in the market, by Allah,” a man claiming to be Boko Haram leader Abubakar Shekau said in a video first obtained by Agence France-Presse.

    “There is a market for selling humans. Allah says I should sell. He commands me to sell. I will sell women. I sell women,” he continued, according to a CNN translation from the local Hausa language.

    “I will marry off a woman at the age of 12. I will marry off a girl at the age of nine,” he said elsewhere in the video.

    Leader Abubakar Shekau warned in a video obtained in March that all students should leave university and girls drop out of school to get married.

    “In Islam, it is allowed to take infidel women as slaves,” Shekau said. “In due course, we will start taking women away.”

    “Access to education is a basic right & an unconscionable reason to target innocent girls,” former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wrote Sunday on Twitter. “We must stand up to terrorism. #BringBackOurGirls.”

    President Obama is being briefed on the attack, and pressure is mounting worldwide for the Nigerian government to act. Speaking during a visit to Africa, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said the United States “will do everything possible to support the Nigerian government to return these young women to their homes and to hold the perpetrators to justice.”

That’s funny considering how long the State Department resisted naming Boko Haram a terrorist organization and that the Obama contribution to Nigeria’s fight against Islamic terror was to pressure the government to appease it.

Boko Haram has murdered thousands, blown up churches and engaged in horrific atrocities. It’s the deadliest Islamic terrorist group in the region and almost certainly has ties to Al Qaeda.

Despite that, Hillary Clinton dragged her feet when she was Secretary of State and now has contributed nothing except a tweet.


Pamela Geller: On the very day that the devout Muslim group Boko Haram released a video of the kidnapped Nigerian schoolgirls, clad in burkas and being forced to recite the Qur’an, author Dean Obeidallah declared in the Daily Beast that “The Nigerian terrorist group that kidnapped hundreds of schoolgirls has nothing to do with Islam, and it’s grotesquely irresponsible of the media to suggest it does.”

Mr. Obeidallah, it’s not the media that suggests it; it is Boko Haram that declares it.

It is not grotesque to tell the truth. What is grotesque is that the widely-read Daily Beast would run such damaging propaganda by a failed yet self-described "comic."

The Daily Beast is doing an end run for Islamic jihad when these girls’ lives hang in the balance. That is a different kind of savagery. The Beast is more worried about Islam’s PR than it is in educating the public on the most grave threat to freedom, not just in Nigeria but across the world.

Clearly, the hashtag #BringBackOurGirls is just more empty rhetoric from hypocrites, not an honest clarion call for action.

The hashtag shouldn’t be #BringBackOurGirls. The hashtag should be #TellTheTruth.

The question we should be asking is, "Why do Muslims attack those of us that are merely reporting the truth? Why aren't these 'moderates' looking inwards and addressing the Islamic texts and teachings that command jihad instead of providing cover?" It is, in fact, complicity.

Dean Obeidallah and other dissemblers may say that Boko Haram is not Islamic, but Boko Haram (and al-Qaeda, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezb'allah, et al.) says that Obeidallah and less devout Muslims aren't Islamic. In the Muslim world, outside of the ivory towers of media and academia, millions of Muslims agree with Boko Haram. Under Islam, secular Muslims are apostates, punishable by death.


Nonie Darwish: Students who invite experts on Middle Eastern culture and critics of Sharia, like myself, must endure horrific pressure to cancel our invitations. No matter what horror happens under Islam, we end up being dismissed by the Left as “Islamophobes.” The situation in America today is upside down, where we see the American Left tolerating Islamic intolerance and protecting Islam’s dirty little secrets from coming to light. We are not doing Muslims and Islam a favor with this cover-up and appeasement. Blatant atrocities against women by Muslims around the world must be exposed and rejected. It is time for the West to condemn Islamic Sharia law by name.



 * Boko Haram means 'everything non-islamic is bad', in other words not only "Western education". Boko Haram's official Hausa name means 'The Congregation of the People of the Tradition of the prophet Mohammad for Proselytism and Jihad'.


* *  The 25 Points of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NAZI) program (with some hasty islam comparison in brackets by Klevius):

        1. We demand the union of all Germans (muslims) in a Great Germany (world Umma) on the basis of the principle of self-determination of all peoples (muslims).

        2. We demand that the German people have rights equal to those of other nations; and that the Peace Treaties of Versailles and St. Germain shall be abrogated.

        3. We demand land and territory (colonies) for the maintenance of our people and the settlement of our surplus population.

        4. Only those who are our fellow countrymen (muslims) can become citizens. Only those who have German blood (are muslims), regardless of creed (background), can be our countrymen. Hence no Jew can be a countryman.

        5. Those who are not citizens must live in Germany as foreigners and must be subject to the law of aliens.

        6. The right to choose the government and determine the laws (Sharia) of the State (Umma) shall belong only to citizens (muslims). We therefore demand that no public office, of whatever nature, whether in the central government, the province, or the municipality, shall be held by anyone who is not a citizen (who is not a muslim).

        We wage war against the corrupt parliamentary administration whereby men are appointed to posts by favor of the party without regard to character and fitness (without regard to commitment for islam).

        7. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen (muslim) shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood. If it should not be possible to feed the whole population, then aliens (non-muslims) must be expelled from the Reich (muslim neighborhood).

        8. Any further immigration of non-Germans (non-muslims) must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately.

        9. All citizens (all true muslim men) must possess equal rights and duties.

        10. The first duty of every citizen (muslim) must be to work mentally or physically (to follow Sharia). No individual (muslim) shall do any work that offends against the interest of the (muslim) community to the benefit of all (true muslim men).

        Therefore we demand:

        11. That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished.

        12. Since every war imposes on the people fearful sacrifices in blood and treasure, all personal profit arising from the war must be regarded as treason to the people. We therefore demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

        13. We demand the nationalization of all trusts.

        14. We demand profit-sharing in large industries.

        15. We demand a generous increase in old-age pensions.

        16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a sound middle-class, the immediate communalization of large stores which will be rented cheaply to small tradespeople, and the strongest consideration must be given to ensure that small traders shall deliver the supplies needed by the State, the provinces and municipalities.

        17. We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land.

        18. We demand that ruthless war be waged against those who work to the injury of the common welfare. Traitors, usurers, profiteers, etc., are to be punished with death, regardless of creed or race.

        19. We demand that Roman law, which serves a materialist ordering of the world, be replaced by German common law (Sharia).

        20. In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural system of the people. The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life. The conception of the State Idea (science of citizenship) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State.

        21. The State has the duty to help raise the standard of national health by providing maternity welfare centers, by prohibiting juvenile labor, by increasing physical fitness through the introduction of compulsory games and gymnastics, and by the greatest possible encouragement of associations concerned with the physical education of the young.

        22. We demand the abolition of the regular army and the creation of a national (folk) army.

        23. We demand that there be a legal campaign against those who propagate deliberate political lies and disseminate them through the press. In order to make possible the creation of a German press, we demand:

        (a) All editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German language shall be German citizens.

        (b) Non-German newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State. They must not be published in the German language.

        (c) All financial interests in or in any way affecting German newspapers shall be forbidden to non-Germans by law, and we demand that the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper and the expulsion of the non-Germans from the Reich.

        Newspapers transgressing against the common welfare shall be suppressed. We demand legal action against those tendencies in art and literature that have a disruptive influence upon the life of our folk, and that any organizations that offend against the foregoing demands shall be dissolved.

        24. We demand freedom for all religious faiths in the state, insofar as they do not endanger its existence or offend the moral and ethical sense of the Germanic race.

        The party as such represents the point of view of a positive Christianity without binding itself to any one particular confession. It fights against the Jewish materialist spirit within and without, and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our folk can only come about from within on the pinciple:

        COMMON GOOD BEFORE INDIVIDUAL GOOD

        25. In order to carry out this program we demand: the creation of a strong central authority in the State, the unconditional authority by the political central parliament of the whole State and all its organizations.

        The formation of professional committees and of committees representing the several estates of the realm, to ensure that the laws promulgated by the central authority shall be carried out by the federal states.

        The leaders of the party undertake to promote the execution of the foregoing points at all costs, if necessary at the sacrifice of their own lives.

No comments:

Post a Comment