Peter Klevius stands for these "stops" and due huge implications - all shame on him if you can prove him wrong (click links if you need to educate yourself before saying something stupid): Stop using the misleading 'gender' instead of sex (sociology)! Stop islam's abuse of Human Rights (jurisprudence)! Stop saying humans came "out of Africa" (anthropology)! Stop talking about "consciousness" when you don't know what you're talking about (philosophy/ai).

Peter Klevius: BBC supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family's strategic use of supremacist islam which has spred muslim hate all over the world's streets, institutions etc. (and usually not correctly, if at all, reported by BBC which instead doesn't hesitate to give long coverage of "alternative news" that better suits its propaganda) - while muslim terrorist organizations keep it within muslim territories. So if true Salafists became the "gurdians of islam's holy places" then that would mean less muslim terror elsewhere. And less to cover up for BBC. How big a contributor to the suffering of islamic supremacist hate crimes has BBC's fake (and lack of) info been? Will we in the future see BBC in an international court accused of crimes against humanity? As it stands now the spill over effect of BBC's cynical support of proxy evil is stained in blood and rape etc. over innocent people. And if true Salafists took over in muslim countries, they would quickly become non-muslim countries. A better option than today's prolonged suffering caused by the hopeless effort to "adapt" a medieval slavery ideology to a modern world based on everyone's Human Rights equality. And if it's so important to keep islam in name only - then islam would loose all of its racist and sexist "we and the other" appeal anyway.

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

Why is BBC aiding islamofascism?

UK's islamic and Sinophobic Parliament

UK's islamic and Sinophobic Parliament

Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Statues of football player Nilla Fischer and Caroline Seger vandalized in Sweden

Islam (represented in UN by Saudi based and steered OIC and its sharia called “islamic human rights”) is against Human Rights!

Sweden’s Supreme Court has found a man guilty of rape for having sex without explicit consent from a "teenage woman" who had been passive and gave no clear expression that she wanted to participate in the sexual acts. Lack of a partner’s spoken agreement or any other clear approval can hence be considered rape. However, islamic sharia gives a muslim man the "right" to have sex with wives and and concubines his "right hand possesses" (e.g. "infidel" girls/women). The neo-islamist rational (original openly supremacist islam didn't need one) is that "it satisfies the sexual desire of the female". Peter Klevius wonders if Swedish Courts will accept this reasoning - perhaps only for muslims?!

Peter Klevius also wonders whether BBS's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not Ramadan fasting, Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim, Mishal Husain, approves of sharia?

UK introduced face recognition after for many years accusing Chinese for having it. Peter Klevius wonders how this fits UK's face covered muslims and others who utilize it?

So how do you vote for someone critical of islam's Human Rights violations if parties don't allow "islamophobia"? Is it democracy?

What do BBC and Jeremy Hunt have in common? Both support the islamofascist murderer and war criminal Mohammad bin Salman.

Peter Klevius: Girls' emancipation needs more football and less cricket, netball etc.

BBC's cricket propaganda is a slap in the face of young girls who need equally much moving around and spatial skills as young boys. However, there's a huge sex segregation in females motivation and access to football - not only the world's by far most popular physical sport, but also the only one that doesn't use tools or hands to handle the ball, and which makes all participants moving most of the time even without the ball. Moreover, the very nature of the sport forces participants to a never ending series of spatial and strategic challenges - with or without the ball and even while playing alone. So why is BBC so hostile to the Queen of sports (the "beautiful game") that is perfect for the physical and spatial development of girls - and in the face of the football loving majority who has to pay compulsory fees (and paying extra for football channels) to this faking regime propaganda media that uses stiff and lifeless colonial cricket for neo-colonial purpose?! England banned football for girls/women already 1921 and suggested cricket, land hockey and netball instead - almost like today except it's not called a ban. And what about the laughable notion of a "world cup" in cricket?! When is the "world cup" in caber tossing between Gotland and Scotland?

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda

BBC, the world's biggest fake/selective news site - with an evil agenda
The murderous war criminal, Saudi muslim "custodian of islam" (and OIC) "prince" MBS is OK but Human Rights defender Peter Klevius isn't. Why?! Because the former isn't an "islamophobe", dude!

Stop US global bullying! What moral right does US have trying to dominate Earth and space? "God"?! Or the Saudi murderer and mass murderer "prince"?! Hasn't US sucked out enough already from the rest of the world? A global dollar manipulation favoring US and paid by the rest. A US marked global license and patent imperialism - and Android. Is Internet next?

26 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting Pakistan rooted muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), worried about Boris Johnson not having cricket as his hobby.

25 June 2019: BBC's leading presenter, the alcohol drinking and not ramadan fasting muslim, Mishal Husain (brought up in Saudi Arabia), sounds desperate when trying to smear Johnson. Is it because Boris 2016 was critical against the Saudis while foreign minister and 2018 critical of muslim women packed in burqas etc.?
BBC thinks the militaristic Saudiphil Jeremy Hunt "is a safer option" as UK PM. What about you?

BBC News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.

BBC News 8:00 AM 23 June 2019: Johnson financially unfit because he spilled wine on a couch.
Is the Saudi "custodian of islam" a muslim - and is the very question "islamophobic", "muslimophobic" or "Saudiphobic"?
Why is BBC comparing Saudi with China?! China's leader isn't a murderer, war criminal, and spreader of terror on the streets! "If we drop the Saudis then we can't deal with China either." Really?! BTW, 'Diversity' means different/conflicting whereas its antonym stands for similar/friendly.

Blinked by BBC's fake "news" which instead boost militaristic confrontation and the smearing of China: The Saudi war criminal "custodian of islam" who murdered Khashoggi is now the world's new Hitler. However, unlike Hitler's Germanic language imperialism, bin Salman's Arabic language imperialism is added by a totalitarian imperialism due to the fact that he is a muslim and as such represents the totality of islam (inc. the Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization O.I.C.'s sharia declaration against Human Rights). Peter Klevius has for long pointed out that we need to distinguish between Human Rights obeying "muslims" and "extremist" muslims, but for some reason they are all bundled as 'muslims'.

Racist Sinophobia disguised as "security" while muslim terror spreading Saudi murderous dictator and war criminal is "an important security ally"!?

Read this: The "out of Africa" hoax is worse than the Piltdown hoax - and much bigger and more worrisome. When will "out of Africaphobia" be criminalized?

Nothing in Primate/Haplorhini evolution came out of Africa - not even Africa (it was disconnected due to tectonics).

A “definition” of “islamophobia” ought to be balanced with a definition of muslim Human Rightsphobia.

"Diversity" without basic (negative) Human Rights is like having a car without steering - dangerous.

In its senseless and continuous "islamophobia" ranting BBC says to be 'muslim' is the same as to be 'English'. Klevius thinks not. A 'muslim' is one who wittingly or unwittingly adheres to what historical records show being the most evil enslaving ideology ever around (from a Human Rights perspective). And Klevius doesn't count as real muslims those who call themselves "cultural muslims" for the purpose of benefiting from a certain "ethnicity", or those who against their will are trapped in muslimhood because of the evil apostasy tenet in islam. And islamic "modesty" attires is a protected way of calling other women "whores".

The most serious threat to our Human Rights is the hate campaign against "islamophobia" which really is directed against Human Rights.

As long as most muslims in the world are ruled by a sharia (e.g. Saudi based and steered OIC) that gravely violates the most basic of Human Rights, and as long as the most devout muslims do the same by simply following original evil (according to Human Rights) islam, you can't legislate against criticism of islam without simultaneously legislating against Human Rights. Why do you want to hinder muslims from apostating? It's a Human Right! Islam should not be allowed to traumatize apostates. Authentic original (e.g. Wahhabi/Salafi) islam doesn't fit in the boots of "Euro-islam" and Human Rights.

Klevius suggests the UK baby should be named Muhammad. After all, according to BBC, the Queen is related to him and all politicians love islam. And several hadiths describe him as white (one even proposing the killing of anyone who says he was black). Only problem being that he then may be described as a white supremacist. Luckily the baby, according to BBC, is “mix-race”.

Klevius to EU voters: If you respect Human Rights - don’t vote for anyone who supports the islamofascist Saudi dictator family who spreads Human Rightsphobia via the Saudi based and steered OIC’s world sharia!

And if you respect your Earthly home – don’t support a hate ideology that encourages over-population and sex apartheid. We don’t need more workers because the most profitable sectors have the least jobs – a trend that AI accelerates.

No true muslim can be fully human.

Why? Because islam's dividing the world in muslims and (not fully human) "infidels" makes it impossible. Only by fully accepting the basic (s.c. 'negative') Universal Human Rights equality - which islam can't accept (see e.g. Saudi based and steered all muslims world Ummah sharia organization OIC) without committing ideological suicide - can we meet every human as basically equal, in the same way as we can give every road-user a basic equality in traffic, i.e. we have traffic sense. So Klevius asks muslims whether they have "traffic sense"? And for all the rest of you - to be 'human' in a global sense can only be achieved by giving every human you meet basic equality - no matter how alien that human might feel to you. Because every human has the right to be "alien" and there can't even be any alternative to this as long as we don't accept brainwashed totalitarianism (see e.g. Klevius 1996 paper Angels of Antichrist). This is the only way to meaningfully talk about 'humankind'. And to alien hunters Klevius says you probably meet them every day already.

So when BBC and other fake media talk about xenophobia against muslims, they actually contribute to spread xenophobia themselves.

A "good muslim" is one who suppresses and distorts original islam so to fit Human Rights. However, some just pretend to do so - and some just continue hating the "infidel".

Peter Klevius to Greta Thunberg: Saudi salafist oil funded supremacist islam or Chinese Taoist (kindness) high tech - which one do you think is the real threat to the people and environmment in EU and the world? Läs min bok Resursbegär (1992)!

Ultimate bigotry and hypocrisy – militant spying and war mongering 5 Eyes instead of true 5G?

Saudi hate spreading antennas (Salafi/Wahhabi mosques etc.) or Chinese world leading 5G tech? No one knows the amount of street etc. victims of Saudi hate because when the haters are muslims their attacks are not recorded as hate crimes. If a Chinese would attack shouting 'Tao' it would most certainly be classified as a hate crime. However, chances are slim that it ever occurs compared to hate attacks made by muslims.

Arabic (not "white" etc.) islam has been the by far biggest enslaver throughout 1,400 years. Islamic language imperialism via the Koran. And all races have been complicit in the muslim Koranic slave trade. So how do you distinguish between descendants of slaves or slave traders? Will Cambridge check today's "Caribbeans", "Africans" etc. about it? Klevius warns there might be unwelcomed surprises, e.g. that many of those who come to Europe are actually descendants of slave trading black Africans on whose wealth lineage top they are better privileged than those from slave lineages. And what about "whites" like Klevius who were cut off from any lineages? Should the skin color Klevius was born with be used against him because of the privileges of others with the same skin color? Same question may be asked about sexism. Klevius doesn’t see it fair to blame him for male sexism just because he happens tp be male, do you!

The real threat is the US led Saudi supporting spy organization 5 Eyes, which 1) tries to block superior tech, and 2) uses China as a scapegoat for US/UK privacy breaches. It's not China but US that wants to control you! So "securing 5G from Chinese influence" actually means giving US/UK a technical space for spying/influencing etc. In short, trying to hinder US/UK customers from accessing the best technology while spying on them.

Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!

BBC collected a UKIP hating mob to shout "islamophobia" against islam criticism.

However, the very same BBC also willfully misleads people about islam so that most people in UK are completely unaware of that Saudi based and steered OIC and its extreme Human Rightsphobia is a world guide for (sharia) muslims. Moreover, BBC's top presenter (Mishal Husain) who seems to be muslim in name only (drinking alcohol, not fasting on Ramadan, no muslim attire, no Haji, no sharia, etc) so to dupe the public about islam.

The 1948 Human Rights declaration was created to protect against fascism. Accepting islam without a clear border against sharia that violates the most basic Human Rights, allows space for islamofascism (i.e. original supremacist islam).

However, the new fascist mob is shouting "islamophobia" because islam can't comply with it (compare Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration against Human Rights). This smear is then "enhanced" by connecting it to murderers, Nazis, right wing extremists etc. Islam's sharia sexism and racist supremacism is the problem - so why is addressing it "bad"?!

BBC is also keen on silencing the only truly free media, i.e. bloggers etc. social media.

The crystal clear connection between the surge in knife, rape etc. attacks and islam - and its custodian, the islamofascist Saudi dictator family - is desperately silenced by BBC and politicians (BBC now tries to cover this up by airing long programs about "conventional" knife crimes). This means they are directly complicit, doesn't it. Klevius suggests boycotting BBC and Saudi bribed politicians. They constitute the worst security threat.

Top emitters

Top emitters

Peter Klevius evolution formula.

Peter Klevius serious questions to you "out of Africa" believer! Ask yourself: How come that the oldest primates came from outside Africa; that the oldest great ape divergence happened outside Africa; that the oldest bi-pedals are from outside Africa; that the only australopithecines with a Homo skull lived as far from Africa you can get; that the oldest truly modern looking skull is from eastern China; that the oldest Africans are mongoloid; that the latest genetic mix that shaped the modern human happened in Siberia and is traced to SE Asia; that the earliest sophisticated art is found from Iberia to Sulawesi - but not in Africa; that the oldest round skulled Homo sapiens in sub-Saharan Africa are much younger than similar skulls in Eurasia; that we lack ancient enough DNA from Africa, etc. etc.? Peter Klevius theory answers all these questions - and more.

Peter Klevius evolution formula.

Existence-centrism (Peter Klevius 1986)

Muslim terrorists get legal aid to stay in UK - EU nationals don't!

The best explanation to the surge in knife crimes since 2015 is the Islamic State's exhortation to street jihad. However, the police don't record hate crimes as muslim - other than if directed against muslims

And do consider that IS and the Saudi dictator family both rest on the same Salafi islam that most young muslims in the West follow. Following Salafism (etc. true muslimhood) involves distinguishing muslims from others, to show that one only belongs to islam and that true muslims ought to be strangers to the "infidels". When Klevius sees a muslim woman in burqa, veil etc. he thinks that's a supremacist and rapist attitude towards other women. And certainly contempt of Human Rights.

UK/BBC's extreme double standard re. the islamofascist Saudi dictator family and China.

Klevius: How come that islamofascist tech poor Saudi property-, media-, infra structure- etc. 'vulnerable' investments and supremacist hate spreading mosques, is considered no threat to UK but instead an 'important ally' while China, which doesn't tick any danger boxes, is deliberately painted by BBC propaganda as the worst threat? And how come that China's peaceful Belt and Road spreading of wealth and high tech is considered worse than UK's continuing militaristic and (un)security meddling within an EU that UK decided to leave for the purpose of EU not meddling within UK?!

UK continues even after Brexit to use EU citizens as bargaining chips by placing their rights in an unsafe statutory instrument instead of in the law.

Stop security cooperation with UK whose close connection to the the suspected murderer, war criminal and islamic terror spreading islamofascist Saudi custodian of islam, Mohammad bin Salman, constitutes the by far worst threat against the security of people in EU! Moreover, sharia islam (the only real islam for real muslims) which is a racist and sexist supremacist ideology that violates Human Rights, is supported by UK.

Don't let haters and Human Rightsphobes get away with it by calling themselves 'believers'!

Either religion is (grades of) supremacist hate and sexism and you better become an Atheist (and therefore universal human) - or you keep your "beliefs" for yourself. In traffic you can think what you want about other people, but you can't drive over them!

You muslim should be ashamed of calling Human Rights defenders "islamophobes"

- and take responsibility for your own supremacist sharia, represented by Saudi based and steered all muslims world organization OIC, which violates the most basic Human Rights! And do note the difference between universal impositions and universal freedom! Full respect of the other rests on accepting her/his freedom. This is the only way of being universally human.

Islam is an evil* supremacist and divisive ideology - why isn’t this told by BBC, schools etc.?

* weighed against the anti-fascist, anti-supremacist, anti-racist and anti-sexist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948 that all civilized people are supposed to build on. Islam doesn't fit these goals, so OIC (the legal world Umma steered from and by the Saudi dictator family) decided to replace them with medieval racist, sexist and supremacist sharia.

Article 24 of the Saudi based and steered OIC's sharia declaration (CDHRI) states: "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Sharia." Article 19 says: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Sharia." CDHRI also fails to guarantee freedom of religion, in particular the right of each and every individual to abandon their religion, as a "fundamental and non-derogable right".

Article 10 of the Declaration states: "Islam is the religion of unspoiled nature. It is prohibited to exercise any form of compulsion on man or to exploit his poverty or ignorance in order to convert him to another religion or to Atheism." Since in Islamic society all reasons for conversion away from Islam are considered to be essentially either compulsion or ignorance, this effectively forbids conversion away from Islam.

CDHRI denies women equality with men by imposing "own rights" and "duties to perform". p { margin-bottom: 0.25cm; line-height: 115%; }

A global world is only possible under the guidance of (negative – i.e. individual freedom from racist/sexist impositions) Human Rights - as outlined in the original anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration of 1948. It excludes any religious or other supremacist tenets or impositions on the individual.

Due to the above and due to the West (politicians and media) having locked itself in with the islamofascist Saudi dictator family (the custodians of islam) we now have a deficit of (negative) Human Rights education – but massively more religious propaganda (e.g. Saudi spread “islamophobia” smear) against these rights. Against this background it's utmost hypocrisy to point against wealth spreading China while supporting islamic hate, terror and war crimes spreading hegemonic Saudi dictator family.

If you don't like Klevius (very few do) you may check if it's him or the anti-racist, anti-sexist and anti-fascist Universal Human Rights declaration you can't digest - but which Klevius stubbornly keeps feeding you.

Iran, Corbyn, bin Laden's son etc. - it's more about protecting BBC's poster boy, war criminal and state terrorist Mohammad Salman, than protecting people on the streets from Saudi exported racist islamic hate terror.

Saudi and BBC hate propaganda against Iran and Shia muslims behind attacks on Corbyn's "anti-Semitism"? BBC's inflammatory and offensive hate mongering use of the oxymoron "anti-Semitic" (reinforced by "islamophobia") protects Semitic (Arab/Sunni/Saudi) muslims from criticism while excluding non-Semitic Shia muslims (e.g. Iran). BBC also use "Asians" when they mean non-Semitic former British Asian muslims, i.e. again not incl. Iranian Shia muslims. Why? Because BBC's poster boy Mohammad Salman hates Shia. England also got a massive problem with "Asian" (sic - read 'mostly Sunni muslim') sex offenders. But no one dares to ask if islam's hate teaching of taking "infidel" sex slaves - and "muslim sensitivity" policies - may encourage it?

The world's biggest fake news producer, UK state media BBC, 20190221 gave the Japanese asteroid landing just a few seconds but managed to squeeze in the fake "info" that "it is the first attempt to take samples back to Earth" (Cathy/PM 17:00) when the previous Japanese sond already 2010 brought back samples from an other asteroid. No one else has managed to do this except the Japanese. This is in line with BBC's usual racist attitude against Japan and China.

Klevius wonders whether BBC/UK government count Islamic State muslims who can't be directly tied to atrocities, as "peaceful muslims"?

Klevius wonders why semitic attacks on Jews are called "antisemitism"?

WARNING about "Five Eyes" and BBC, and their "close ally", the hate, terror and war crimes producing islamofascist "custodian of islam", the Saudi dictator family!
If you prefer peace, democratic non-fake information and positive development - ask your politicians to avoid US/UK's war mongering militarism and the world's biggest state propaganda tool BBC, which constitutes the most serious threat to free information. UK government is pushing for neo-British imperialist militarist meddling and intervention around the world - and making its propaganda tool BBC "the custodian of fact checks", i.e. a wolf among sheep.

Theresa May wants to leave EU. That should include UK militarist meddling within EU as well. Leave means leave! Don't let UK and its "close ally" the islamofascist Saudi dictator family contaminate EU citizens lives. Don't let the insidious spy organization Five Eyes spy on EU citizens and their leaders and parliamentarians. Don't let BBC's or islam's glossy surface (i.e. normal news/info and non-sharia muslims respectively) lure you to not see the evil core. Klevius is the opposite. WYSIWYG. No hidden evil core, just defense of your (whoever you are) basic Human Rights that islam wants to deny you.

UK government wants to force EU to put a border on Ireland - so it can blame EU for something UK-Brexit caused. Brexiters want to eat the cake while still having it. Unconstitutional UK has become a cancer that hopes to survive by creating metastases in line with old fashioned British imperialism.

Do you support Human Rights or sharia?

Klevius islam logic: If I is SI and SI is not HR then I is not HR. For those who don't understand formal logic: If islam is sharia islam and sharia islam violates Human Rights, then islam violates Human Rights.

Theresa May & Co defend sharia by saying "it's just a a contract". This is utter lie because any meaningful islam demands sharia and stepping out of the "contract" is the worst sin you can commit as a muslim (s.c. apostasy). Theresa May's and others deception is built on the mass of secular muslims, i.e. not true muslims. And these "secular muslims" get away with it as long as there's not enough true muslims to demand sharia all over the pitch - as yet. Moreover, Saudi led sharia finance demands sharia compliance - as does Saudi based and steered OIC, all muslims world organization.

Klevius supports "secular muslims" - Theresa May supports sharia muslims.

Klevius supports no border on Ireland. Follow the will of the people, i.e. let England leave and let Scotland and Northern Ireland stay.

UK is an unconstitutional mess which now wants to leave EU without controlling its border to EU. A proper constitution would have demanded qualified majority in two consecutive elections/votes about such a crucial matter as Brexit - and being aware what the vote is about. The root of the problem is England's mad man Henry 8's colonialization of Ireland and lack of constitution. The preposterous "British" Brexit parody is then spiced with the government's and BBC's use of religious hate mongering etc. In summary UK is an anomaly of countries trying to be a state in a world of federal states united as countries.

Calling criticism of islam "islamophobia" is pure racism and also supports islamic racism and sexism

BBC isn't much interested in anti-semitism, homophobia etc. but uses them as an excuse for its Saudi/OIC supported "islamophobia" smear campaign against Human Rights and its media competitors.

Is BBC's Pakistan rooted and Saudi raised muslim(?) presenter Mishal Husain an "islamophobe" against evil* islam, or an apostate supporting toothless** "islam"? She doesn't fast during Ramadan but rather drinks some alcohol, and doesn't veil herself and says she doesn't feel any threats to her way of life (Klevius: thanks to Human Rights - not sharia islam), well knowing how muslim and non-muslim women suffer in muslim sharia countries like Pakistan and Saudi Arabia without Human Rights. What would she say to a muslim terrorist asking her if she's a muslim? Isn't it about time to stop this bigoted and hypocritical indirect support of islamofascism that this Saudi/OIC initiated "islamophobia" smear camopaign against Human Rights*** is all about?

* Human Rights equality violating sharia islam
** in line with the anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-sexist U.N.'s 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration.
*** Socialists have an ideological problem with individual Human Rights, and are therefore vulnerable for islamism (see Klevius 1994).

This Viking gives a lesson you really need.

Are "whites" the new Jews - and in need of a burqa or skin color change?

Are "whites" the new Jews - and in need of a burqa or skin color change?

Theresa May & Co and state media BBC play with race cards

Theresa May & Co and state media BBC play with race cards

US/UK is a security risk - not China. Tell your EU politician!

US/UK is a security risk - not China. Tell your EU politician!

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Klevius "islamophobic" heroine Nawal El Saadawi from Egypt

Politicians against people

Politicians against people

Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

Britisharia Human Rightsphobia

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

Is UK turning into a militaristic unconstitutional islamofascist rogue state?

First UK people voted to join and share borders with EU. Then England voted to leave while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to stay. And now UK politicians want to leave while keeping the Irish EU border open. UK lacks a modern constitution according to which a constitutional issue has to pass at least two majority votes.

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

UK sells weapons to Saudis - and smears peaceful China who can do better weapons themselves.

Theresa May and the world's most dangerous man contendently sharing sharia values

Theresa May and the world's most dangerous man contendently sharing sharia values

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

A "close ally" of the islamofascist Saudi dictator family mixes OIC sharia with Human Rights

Are you or your representative(s) for or against basic Human Rights equality?

Peter Klevius global morality can only be challenged by violating the most basic of Human Rights.

Everything Peter Klevius writes (or has written) is guided by the anti-sexist. anti-racist, and anti-fascist Universal* Human Rights declaration of 1948. In other words, what is declared immoral and evil is so done as measured against the most basic of Human Rights (the so called "negative" rights - i.e. the rights of the individual not to be unnecessarily targeted with restrictions and impositions). Unlike the 1948 Universal Human Rights (UHR) declaration, islam denies Human Rights equality to women and non-muslims. And violation of such basic Human Rights can't be tolerated just by referring to "freedom of religion".

* This means accepting everyone - without exception due to e.g. sex, religion, lack of religion, "security" etc. - as equal in Human Rights. The individual is protected by negative Human Rights, but of course not against substantiated legal accusations - as long as these are not produced as a means that violates the basic Human Rights (compare "not necessary in a free, democratic country"). The legislator may not produce laws that seek to undermine some individuals rights. This also includes e.g. "freedom of religion", i.e. that this freedom doesn't give the right to unfree others, or cause others to be in an inferior rights position. If by islam you mean something that fully adheres to basic Human Rights equality, then you aren't targeted by Peter Klevius islam criticism. However, if you mean islam accepts violations of the most basic of Human Rights, then you may also call Peter Klevius an "islamophobe" - and he will be proud of it. And when it comes to "security" it can't mean "offending" opponents to basic Human Rights.

This is why any effort to twist or accuse the writings of Peter Klevius as "islamophobia" etc. can only be made from a standpoint against these basic Human Rights. As a consequence, no body of authority can therefore accuse, hinder etc. Peter Klevius without simultaneously revealing its own disrespect for these Human Rights. Conversely, Peter Klevius can not accuse anyone who agrees on these rights - i.e. this leaves e.g. "islamophobia" etc. accusations against Peter Klevius without merit.

Every effort against these basic Human Rights is treason against a country calling itself free and democratic.

Some basic facts to consider about Klevius* (except that he is both "extremely normal" and extremely intelligent - which fact, of course, would not put you off if you're really interested in these questions):

* Mentored by G. H. von Wright, Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge.

1 Klevius' analysis of consciousness is the only one that fits what we know - after having eliminated our "pride" bias of being humans (which non-human would we impress, anyway?). Its starting point is described and exemplified in a commentary to Jurgen Habermas in Klevius book Demand for Resources (1992:30-33, ISBN 9173288411, based on an article by Klevius from 1981), and is further explained in a commentary to Francis Crick's book The Astonishing Hypothesis under the title The Even More Astonishing Hypothesis (EMAH), which can be found in Stalk's archive and which has been on line since 2003 for anyone to access/assess.

2 Klevius out of island/mainland fluctuating Southeast Asia Denisovans up to big skulled Siberians as the birth of much more intelligent modern humans who then spread all over the world, is the only analysis that fits both genetic reality as well as tool and art sophistication seen in e.g. the Denisova cave (no dude, Blombos etc. don’t come even close).

3 Klevius criticism of Human Rights violating sharia islamofascism (e.g. OIC) which is called "islamophobia" by islamofascists and their supporters who don't care about the most basic of Human Rights (e.g. re. women). Klevius' "islamophobia" has two roots: 1) UN's 1948 Universal Human Rights declaration, which, contrary to any form of muslim sharia, doesn't, for example, allow sex to be an excuse for robbing females of their full Human Rights equality, and 2) the history of the origin of islam ( e.g. Hugh Kennedy, Robert G. Hoyland, K. S. Lal etc.) which reveals a murderous, pillaging, robbing, enslaving and raping racist/sexist supremacist ideology that exactly follows precisely those basic islamic tenets which are now called "unislamic" but still survive today (as sharia approved sex slavery, sharia approved "liberation” jihad, academic jihad etc.) behind the sharia cover which is made even more impenetrable via the spread of islamic finance, mainly steered from the islamofascist Saudi dictator family.

4 Klevius analysis of sex segregation/apartheid (now deceptively called “gender segregation”) and heterosexual attraction - see e.g. Demand for Resources (1981/1992), Daughters of the Social State (1993), Angels of Antichrist (1996), Pathological Symbiosis (2003), or Klevius PhD research on heterosexual attraction/sex segregation and opposition to female footballers (published in book form soon).

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Rabbi Sacks: "BBC runs Britain." Klevius: Pro-sharia BBC meddles worldwide.

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Saudi induced muslim attack on UK Parliament. How many elsewhere? And what about Saudi/OIC's sharia

Racist UK Government and BBC

Racist UK Government and BBC

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

UK's sharia ties to Saudi islamofascism threaten EU (and UK) security

Peter Klevius "islamophobia"/Human Rightsphobia test for you and your politicians

Warning for a muslim robot!

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

There's no true islam without Human Rights violating sharia

UK PM candidate Rees-Mogg: Germans needed Human Rights - we don't. Klevius: I really think you do.

The Viking phenomenon started with bilingual Finns raiding/trading sex slave to Abbasid (ca 750)

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

Klevius 1979: Human Rights rather than religion

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

BBC (imp)lies that 84% of the world is "monotheist" although most people are A(mono)theists

Peter Klevius' 1986 experimental zero budget refugee video

Klevius can no longer distinguish between the techniques of BBC and Nazi propaganda - can you!

By squeezing in Atheist ideologies/philosophies as well as polytheisms under the super set BBC calls "religion", and by narrowing 'Atheism' to what it's not (Atheism is what it says on the tin - no god) they produced the extremely faked proposition that 84% of the world's population is "religious". Moreover, BBC also proudly claimed that the 84% figure is rising even more. Well, that's only by relying on those poor women in Pakistan, Bangladesh, English muslim ghettos (where most so called "British" women don't even speak English) etc., who still produce many more children than the average in the world. But Klevius doesn't think this abuse of girls/women is anything to cheer.

The main threat to your Human Rights

The main threat to your Human Rights

BBC's compulsory fee funded propaganda for Saudi sharia islam

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Origin of islam - and origin of the Vikings

Samantha Lewthwaite, Mishal Husain and Michael Adebolajo

God is an escape route from Human Rights

First sophisticated art by the first truly modern humans

Oldest real portrait ever found (26-29,000BP Central Europe, dated by the latest space technology)

Finland's lion tramping the islamic scimitar 1583

We're all born unequal - that's why we need Human Rights, not islam!

Two slavs and one ex-muslim kick islam in its groin

A victim of rapetivism - and an interfaith messenger of rapetivism

A victim of rapetivism - and an interfaith messenger of rapetivism


Islam doesn't only support slavery but was itself, from start (first Islamic slaves were Arabs),
the very essence of slavery. To understand the origin of Islam as Koranic slavery one has to understand the pre-Islamic trade routes going through the Arabian peninsulaThe medieval expansion of Islam has been a forgotten analytical tool for most historians when it comes to historical dynamics such as e.g. Mongols, Vikings etc. But whereas the Mongol invasions were originally initiated as an "attacking defence" against Islamic invasions/atrocities, the Vikings started as slave traders serving Islam. The pattern could actually have been exactly the same as in Africa had it not been for a powerful Christianity in between (again, note that Klevius isn't a Christian nor even "religious" in any meaning resembling mideastern monolitheisms - see Klevius definition of religion).

Goodbye to the Vikings? (2006) Richard Hodges (known from the "Islamic Origins" Institute) "re-reads" early Middle Age history from the distorted position as one more in a long row of populist re-readers with pro-Islamic intentions. This is perhaps why he misses entirely the whole point of Islamic slave trade as the basis not only for Islam itself but also for the understanding of Islam's influence in medieval Europe!

In one of his many popular science books archaeologist and associate professor Mats G. Larsson, allegedly interested in the Viking age, writes (1998) that in exchange for francian swords and "other goods" huge amounts of arabic coins began streaming in via Staraja Ladoga and Birka. Does this signal an enormous lack of scientific understanding or is it just pure political correctness (extremely deep and widespred in Swedish universities)?! The very fact that some swords are found there tells very little abt what was the real commerce abt. Especially considering "slave remains" are rare!
-The Islamic balancing of the proportion "infidels" and "muslims" in the wake of expansion

has to be understood in the light of Koranic Islam as a blueprint for slavery/rapetivism

Nine months after a forced or institutionalized rape a captured/traded slave girl had transformed from being a victim of sexual abuse/assault to a muslim mother and educator of her (Islam's) child(ren) under the sword of Sharia. From sexual plesure for the rapist patriarchs to a cultural fosterer of more of the same! That's the simple formula underlying Islam's "success" in conquest.

Islam proponents often brag that Islam doesn't use missionaries. Well da, you can't eat the cake and still have it, can you! This is why Islamic slave trade routes historically are actively rooted in "infidel" land. Of course, there were enough helpless slave girls etc available in most parts were the Islamic slave trader planted their nets/raids etc, but the tremendous expansion combined with the eagerness of scared people to convert to Islam for the sake of protection from Islam, constituted a real threat against Islam's economic base. Read more abt this on
Origin of Islam.
Usually it's argued that it's unknown what triggered the Viking expansion. Historians have, for example, suggested technological innovations, positive climate change and due population growth.
Others have proposed the 785 destruction of the Frisian fleet by Charlemagne, as interrupting the flow of goods from Central Europe to Scandinavia, hence paving the way for Viking traders/raiders. Yet others emphasise centralisation of power in fewer hands in the aftermath of turmoil in Scandinavia. However, here it will be argued that none of the factors above, alone or combined, can even remotely compete with an explanation based on Islam's tremendous increase in slave trading during the advent of the Viking Age. The more one looks into it the more convincing the picture. So why hasn't it been offered before? The simple answer is that whereas white racists didn't like the image of Viking "heroes" killing defenceless white families and robbing their minor daughters (and some sons although these were often taken back to Sweden as 'trälar") and making a huge industry in selling them as sex slaves to Islam, today's racist/sexist pro-Islamists don't like it either!

The Role of Migration in the History of the Eurasian Steppe (2000), when considering the causes of the Viking expansion, all attention is domestic and not a single word is offered towards external causes like the simple fact that new demands (Islamic slavery) signalled through old trade/raid routes (e.g. Russian river ways) may have considerable effects on even small communities if they are capable of delivering what is demanded. Perhaps Scandinavian fur traders just happened to have their wives/daughters with them (as we know the Vikings sometimes had) and someone (the Bolgars?) told them that similar, pretty slaves would mean big business with the muslims.Facts

- Eurasian river-systems from nort to south and vice versa have been crucial, not only in the
evolution/spreading of modern humans (also see Klevius anthropology blog) but also as extremely useful channels for trading/raiding.
- Viking boats were shallow-draught, light and perfect for light "cargo" that could walk by itself on difficult passages.
- From e.g. the Annals of Xanten we know that at least at one occasion in 837, in Walcheren, only females were abducted as slaves by the Vikings.
- Viking age emerged after the expansion of Islam.
- The Kazars stopped the Muslims in the east at the time when Charles Martel defeated them in the west (around 730).
- Viking age ended/transformed in conjuction with the decline of Islamic Cordoba, Abbasid etc and with the progression of empowered Christinity
- Koran/Islam clearly sanctions slavery (in fact, one may argue that Islam
is institutionalized slavery/rapetivism).
- Muslims preferred white slave girls, i.e. these were the most valuable of all slaves (and, of course, both easy to handle and abuse during long journeys - I suggest reading Artur Lundkvist's well-informed novel
Slavar för Särkland/i.e. someting like Slaves for Baghdad, 1978 - see exerpts below)..
- some 100.000 Arab/Islamic (mostly Abbasid) coins from the Viking age have been found in Sweden. A majority of them at Gotland in the Baltic sea, i.e on the island known for its 'russ' horses and a probable home harbour for Viking Rus, the "founder" of Russia (in fact he was asked to help the Russians against his fellow Viking looters).
- there was a huge increase in trade activity compared to pre-Viking age Scandinavia. Furthermore economic historians as well as historians of finance are beginning to agree that the trading of slaves connected to Islam has been greatly under-estimated.
- although slave taking/trading etc existed before, Islam made it a "religion"/"social state" (see Klevius
Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs social state) /big business that the caliphates rested on.
- the Vikings were widely feared of in Europe but not in Arab/Islamic land..
- Viking slave trading stopped via Christianity and the creation of a feudal system, i.e. bridging to the so called Hansa period around the Baltic sea.
Koran 33:50: "Prophet, We have made lawful to you the wives to whom you have granted dowries and the slave girls whom God has given you as booty."
Ibn Sa'd in Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir: Muhammed liked Mariyah (a slave girl),who was of white complexion, with curly hair and pretty.
Concepts and possible factsSome Finnish, Baltic and Russian researchers now argue that the eastern Viking slave route predated the western one. Note that the very word Viking is often poorly conceptualized in different writings. Klevius Viking concept is: The north-European product of a pronounced increase in slave trading that was caused by Islam's pronounced increase in demand for slaves, as well as elaborate channels (incl. Jews etc) for this trade..

- Varjager (the name given for the Eastbound Vikings (from around 850 - but note that Vikings were present in Russia before 750) possibly comes from the Finnic-Ugric word for thieve 'wargas" (Finnish 'varkas' or 'varas'). Also compare Swedish 'varg' wolf, and 'jägare' hunter (wolves hunt/loot as a pack don't they).
- Valkyrie may mean 'chosen at slaughter', i.e. girls taken captive when the rest in raided villages were killed or expelled

Klevius' hypothesis on the "Viking age"

The so called Viking age (8th to 11th century) was initiated by Islam's demand for white slave girls and was finished by Christianity/feudalism (a bias comment: Klevius has never been a Christian or even believer in any mideast "monolitheist religion"). People wanted protection from Viking raids which fact, together with the fact that Islam threatened Europe from opposite directions, paved the way for Christian missionary/fortifications. Interestingly eastbound and westbound Vikings met in Miklagård (Constantinople). Furthermore it seems that the long transition period from Viking "paganism" to Viking Christianity may be explained as a result of commercial.pragmatism and long distances.

Trafficking, slavery and rapetivism/sex segregation need to be morally justified. This is why Islam rests on the racist "infidel" concept. Furthermore, to avoid any criticism the concept is said to come from a god who can't be questioned because he is cut off from the earthly via Mohammed and his "interpretors"..

Islam as an idea to conquer and sponge on human capital not only rests on, but is the result of the conditions in a pre-Islamic world. So yes, slavery existed before Islam, as did trading and looting, wars etc. But the point here is that certain Arabs (who couldn't/didn't want to do anything else), started campaigning an elaborated system - KORAN/ISLAM - of sponging based on slavery and institutionalized rapetivism (the first been enslaved being poor nomad Arabs). As we do know, this led to a tremendous expansion along existing trade routes and, as a consequence, to a great  demand for slaves (especially young girls) and a corresponding increase in commerce/finance due to the wealth of.silver/gold that the Islamists had robbed from Africa, Central-Asia etc. It might be worth mentioning that the reason why Islam is said to not have missionaires is the fear of "infidel" shortage!  However, as shown by M. Gordon and others, Muslims have throughout history had no problems enslaving other Muslims.

The word "valkyrie" comes from the Old Norse valkyrja (plural "valkyrur"), from the words "val" (slaughter) and "kyrja" (to choose). Literally the term means choosers of the slain. Cognate forms include the Old English "wælcyrige" and the German "Walküre." If this interpretation is rewersed (and I see no reason why not - but if you know, please tell me on the
blog) we get:'girl chosen from the slain! Of course this doesn't affect the hypothesis either way but its an appealing thread, and, at least, a good title for the already known change from malign (raven on slain corpses) to benign (beauty, pleasure, fertility etc) that is recorded at the beginning of the Viking age.

Note that the secondary meaning of the 'valkyries' as "after death compensation" may also have been strengthened by contacts to the Islamic story abt young gils waiting for sexually please the slain jihadists. Also note that the lack of Islamization of the Vikings may be related to the simple and pragmatic fact that the Vikings had to cross/deal with Christians and Jews on their way down (look at your Europe map and compare it with European history of the time!).
From Slavar för Särkland (Artur Lundqvist, 1978) excerpts summarized and translated by P. Klevius

p 173 Flocks of slaves on their way to the Baghdad caliphate which seemed never to get enough of them.

p 180 In Baghdad it's hard to disinguish between male and female hookers - but no one seems to care whether the front or rear hole should be utilized.

p 180.What they see in Baghdad annoys them. The miserable state of the people doesn't in any sense exclude pompousness and a behavior like the whole world belonged to them.

p 181 Even males sit down piing hence showing fat asses resembling unbaked dough. Fleshy and powerless bodies in an unhealthy sense with hanging bellies and jumping cheeks.

p 188 Slave trader: And this young girl isn't yet used at all, just check for yourself. She can give her master great pleasure now and later on when her body gets the female form.

p 189 Viking Ulving starts doubting his mission in this traffic. He hasn't really seen the full picture before now.
Klevius comment: Perhaps there's also something to consider for those who haven't, even today, seen (or blinked) the full (slave/rape)picture of Islam!Klevius etymology: The ancient Persian word for god 'khoda' connects to Finnish 'koti' and Finno-Ugric 'kota' (=home/house/seed vessel - see Klevius definition of religion and the Vagina gate), Saami 'goahti'. German Gott (god) and Swedish gott (good) as well as Gotland (pronounced Gottland).

Note the river link from Bay of Finland to the Viking (Rus)-Arab trade center in Bulgar. Also note that Staraja Ladoga is est. at 750 (even earlier by some Finnish and Russian researchers) and that Vikings were using Volga down to Abbasid at least in the early 9th century, probably far earlier. Furthermore, because of the Avars the Djnepr route was more difficult up to around 800. Old trade  routes to Bulgar Volga were intensified and more directed on slave girls than on fur when Islam announced its slave girl hunger (see
Rapetivism and the origin of Islam) via the Bulgars. Here one also has to carefully consider the facts that 1) the northern areas were quite sparsely populated hence not allowing for great fleets, armies, economies etc from the beginning, 2) that existing types of boats and routes were utilized/optimized in congruence with the islamic slave demand 3) that white slave girls were extremely high in value among Abbasid muslims, as well as 4) easy to pick up along the Finnish, Baltic and Russian rivers. As a consequense of this lucrative raiiding/trading in small scale Viking groups a more influential Viking aristocracy emerged and merged with Slavs etc eventually ending up as great armies in other parts of Europe.
Origin of Vikings & Origin of Islam: Islamic slavery, the Vikings and Algeidjuborg (Staraja Ladoga - see map below) by Peter Klevius 2005/2006


 Native Brits from Doggerland spoke a proto-Finnish/Uralic language

We non-muslims need to honor racist islam's victims - cause muslims won't

We non-muslims need to honor racist islam's victims - cause muslims won't

The islamic extermination of Jews

Modern humans originated in Siberia

Alwaleed bin Talal, a rape accused muslim who's never worked & spends oil Billions on sexist Sharia

Alwaleed bin Talal, a rape accused muslim who's never worked & spends oil Billions on sexist Sharia
Klevius is probably now the world's foremost expert on sex segregation, and islam (the worst cime ever) is the foremost expression of sex segregation. By 'islam' Klevius means Sharia as described by Bill Warner.

Burn OIC's islamic anti-Human Rights declaration!

The bedrock of "monotheist" religions is sex apartheid - and worst of them is islam

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Minna Canth, a Finland-Swedish fighter for women's rights against religious sex apartheid

Minna Canth was a Finland-Swede just like Klevius

Did you know that the word 'God' comes from the Finnish word for home which predates all "monotheisms" and Mideastern "civilizations"?

The ancient Persian (which is extremely young compared to Uralic) word for god 'khoda' connects to the even more ancient Finnish 'koti' and Finno-Ugric/Uralic 'kota' (=home/house/seed vessel - see Klevius definition of religion and the Vagina gate), Saami 'goahti'. German Gott (god) and Swedish gott (good) as well as Gotland (pronounced Gottland), the island in the Baltic sea that constituted a (the?) main Viking* hub in their slave trade with Jews and muslims. This very same Gotland belonged before the Viking age to Kvenland under the half mythic (but less so than the entirely** mythic Mohammed) Finnish King Fornjotr (approximately 160-240 CE).

* see also The oldest textual use of the word 'Viking'

** Hugh Kennedy (professor of Arabic language and Arabic history): "Before Abd al-Malik (caliph 685-705) Mohammed (dead 632) is never mentioned on any official document whatsoever..."

Linguistic sex apartheid

As Klevius has pointed out for decades, in Finnish (as in most other languages) there is no sex segregation. A person is 'hän' regardless of sex, not the stupid he/she apartheid Europe has inherited from sexist Mideastern "monotheisms".

Is this why Finland became the most progressive country in Europe more than a century ago? And do note that full (i.e. also electable etc) voting rights for women in Finland was the result of non-socialists. Partly social-democratic Sweden had to wait 14 years to achieve the same.

The bilingual Minna Canth street sign in Helsinki reflects not only 600 years as part of Sweden but, according to Klevius, perhaps even more so the time before, namely as Kvenland (Queenland) the home of the Goths and the Vikings.

Minna Canth, born Ulrika Wilhelmina Johnsson, 19 March 1844, Tampere/Finland - 12 May 1897, Kuopio/Finland) was a Finnish-Swedish writer (i.e. mother tongue Swedish*) and social activist who wrote her most important works against religion and the treatment of women in Finnish. She inspired the proposal 1897 in the Finnish Parliament (actually same year as she died).

 * in Finland both Swedish and Finnish are official languages since long ago (also see Kvenland/Kvinnoland/Queenland

Origin of Vikings & Origin of Islam: Islamic slavery, the Vikings and Algeidjuborg (Staraja Ladoga - see map above) by Peter Klevius 2005/2006

Part II Origin of Islam
ORIGIN, DEVELOPMENT, AND END OF SLAVE-ISLAM-1400 years of Koranic slave pilgrimage through Mecca, Baghdad etc.
by Peter Klevius (based on Homo Filius Nullius 2001)
(Editing comes later! Unlike terror channel Al-Jazeera and the Islamic lends its voice to I don't possess access to oil well wealth) 
Introductionary comments

Ever thought abt why Islam is always excused and removed from its consequences?

Ever thought abt why there is no mentioning of Mohammed before some 60+ years after his death?
The formula of Islam
Slavery+"infidel" racism+sex segregated rapetivism+anti human rights Sharia/apostasy ban

On behalf of today's and historical victims of Islam (in Darfur and globally), and on behalf of all humans who feel offended by the tenets/acts of Islam. Why isn't the worst* crime ever against humanity criminalized, but instead protected by the very human rights it opposes?!
* i.e. 1400 years of slavery/rapetivism/genocides

Without these evil racist/sexist/fascist extremist pillars and violent terror threats from so called "unislamic"* and confused morons Islam is dead!

Slavery (forbidden all over the world except in Koran/Islam) - It's well known that Islam allows slavery, although perhaps less well known that Islam emerged out of the very idea of sponging on institutionalized slavery. This is why Saudi islamofascist dictators, imams etc. terrorists and terrorist supporters still don't understand that the Koran is completely wrong, not only because it allows slavery but especially in claiming to be some "god's" unchangeable word hence excluding even the possibility of reformation!
"Infidel" racism (forbidden according to the UN declaration on every humans equal value, but a basic tenet of Koran/Islam) - The moral cornerstone needed for taking slaves and abusing others. Today this alluring but evil racism is utilized in a variety of topics from the people of Darfur to the West in particular or general.
Rapetivism (globally forbidden because it's not in accordance with the principle that a person's sex shouldn't be used as a regulator of that person's freedom, but a basic tenet in Koran/Islam) - Rigid sex segregation for the purpose of abusing Islam confined girls/women as physical and cultural reproducers of as many new Muslims as possible.
Sharia (forbidden in a democracy simply because it violates democracy and, like the other Islamic pillars, a bunch of human rights that democracy rests on) - Islam's jurisprudence for sex segregated rapetivism, apostasy ban etc. Ehsan Jami (Dutch ex-muslim): "We have an enormous problem with apostasy in Islam. We see a lot of problems where people want to leave Islam but they can't,"
Apostasy ban (forbidden because it limits a person's freedom of or from religion, but a basic tenet in Koran/Islam) - Children (commonly from birth) and adults (commonly via marriage/rape) are forced to become and stay Muslims.
These cannot be erased by mere "interpretations" but needs deep reformist castration! And in this sense "majority Muslims" are tightly connected to Islamic extremism, i.e. to Islam itself. And if that's just because of plain ignorance abt Islam they better educate themselves, e.g. in a Koran school true to the Koran and Islam! When coming out they then have two choices: Becoming an "extremist" (open or stealthy) or abandoning the message alltogether!

That Islam (Koran) allows and even encourages psychological and physical wife beating is just one of an abundance of "minor" ripples of the main pillars above. The naivity of Muslim feminism may be exemplified by Asghar Ali: "...shari'ah also clearly lays down that if a man hides his impotency from his bride at the time of marriage and she discovers it after marriage, she is fully entitled to divorce on that ground. This itself clearly shows that she is entitled to sexual pleasure along with raising family." Rising what family?! The only reason for this rule is to safeguard that no woman fails to reproduce as many Muslims as possible!

The victims of Islam often reveal the same lojalty conflict as allegedly do victims of child abuse. However, some don't.

Ehsan Jami (a young Dutch politician): "People think I am a radical. They think I hate Muslims, but ... it is the ideology which is the problem and not the people themselves."

So why isn't the human rightsphobia we call Islam globally criminalized and indicted, and how come that many a "democracy" seem to care more abt islamofascist terrorists than supporting the war on islamofascist terror?! And why are we supposed to ask islamist imams, professors etc for advice?! It's like asking Goring how to deal with Hitler and his terrorist youth! The likely answer: "Don't question, criticize or mess with us but support us!"

Abul Kasem (ex-Muslim* author) from the Islam under Srutiny series, 26 May, 2006: "Allah's Disliking: Challenges, Questions about Him, Poets, Music, Singing, Dancing, Disobedient Women, Private Parts, Education & Prosperity, Kings.
Allah's Liking: Perfumes, Mosque-building, Frightening Believers, Blind Believers, Praising Himself, Child-molesters, Wife-beaters, Terrorize Infidels, Sex-slaves, Plundering - not Agriculture, Memorization - not understanding, Those Fighting for Him, Illiteracy & Poverty, Animal Cruelty, Pebbles & Stones, Kill Apostates, Behead & Burn people, Cursing Infidels, Arabs, Falling ill & suffering."

* Whom do you trust more in critically scrutinizing Islam, a Muslim or an ex-Muslim?!

Sweden's Islamofascist national radio again voices misogynist extremist imams!.
Sweden's national radio again broadcasted the extremist opinion of the extremely** misogynist state islamist imam Leif Karlsson (alias "abd al haq kielan") who seems to know almost nothing abt Islam (or simply acts dumb). In short he claims that suicide-bombers and other violent jihadists are ignorant morons who have nothing to do with Islam.
Klevius comment: So what has actually to do with Islam? Especially if you also remove the fascist pillars above! Islam seems always to be somewhere else than its traces!.

** Extremist islamist imam Leif Karlsson (alias "Abd al Haqq Kielan") has, for example, stated that women should not be allowed a social life outside home! Read Leif Karlsson's "biography" written by Klevius! Interestingly Leif Karlsson was initially excited by the poverty he encountered in Muslim land (compare Peter Klevius' De Imand for Resources - on the right to be poor).
Like other "peaceful" islamofascists imam Leif Karlsson (alias "Abd al Haq Kielan") gets his real support from precisely those he claims are no real Islamists, i.e. as conventional fascists fascists used to do back in the 1930s, through violent threats etc.!

UPDATE: When Islamofascist European Council for Fatwa and Research issues a "fatwa" abt "dialogue" and "ban on criticism against Islam" Sweden's Islamofascist national radio again eagerly reports it!


European Council for Fatwa and Research is a self-selected body, composed by Islamofascist clerics and scholars, presided by Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who, for example, supports supports death for atheists and homosexuals, wife beating, obligatory hijab on women, the Sudan genocide in Darfur, the destruction of Israel, explicitly rejects separation of state and church and freedom of religion, and demands "that the UN adopt a clear resolution or law that categorically prohibits affronts to prophets - to the prophets of the Lord and His messengers, to His holy books, and the religious holy places."


Steve Emerson : “In fact, the fatwa (abt condemning terrorism) is bogus. Nowhere does it condemn the Islamic extremism ideology that has spawned Islamic terrorism. It does not renounce nor even acknowledge the existence of an Islamic jihadist culture that has permeated mosques and young Muslims around the world. It does not renounce Jihad let alone admit that it has been used to justify Islamic terrorist acts. It does not condemn by name any Islamic group or leader. In short, it is a fake fatwa designed merely to deceive the - public into believing that these groups are moderate. In fact, officials of (these) organizations have been directly linked to and associated with Islamic terrorist groups and Islamic extremist organizations.”

Are one third of EU Muslims bloodthirsty fascists?.
Thirty percent of Muslims in the Netherlands are not prepared to condemn violence against apostates, according to a survey carried out by Foquz Etnomarketing for TV programme Nova.
EU preparing to ban Islam's apostasy ban!
EU is about to hand in a resolution aimed to re-emphasise freedom of religion meaning that every Muslim has the right to apostasy, i.e. change religion!

Klevius comment: Da! So why hasn't it been done before?!

Cure your ignorance about
What is this cowardice and hypocritical contemporary blinking/forgery of Islam's history?! Same as last time fascism showed its ugly violent face in Europe?!


Although a quite hetero-horny guy from early on and a big fan of female asses I´ve never shared the Islamic "problem"* of facing female asses (see Heterosexual attraction) in front of me. The Swedish top state imam Leif Karlsson (alias "Abd-al-Haqq-Kielan"), frequently residing in Swedish state media, however, not only has a problem with female asses (that's why, according to him, females should face men's asses in the mosque, i.e. because they aren't equally "tempered") but he also thinks women/girls shouldn´t be allowed a social life either! Yes, you read it right! And this is MAINSTREAM EUROISLAM! In Pakistan they are about to (re)introduce death penalty for apostasy (leaving Islam) alternatively lifetime in jail for females so they can still be used for Islamic rapetivism. And look at "the moderate Islamic model land of the future" Malaysia, where  anyone marrying a Muslim must convert to Islam, and anyone born into a Muslim family cannot abandon Islam! Saudi-Arabia, the origin of this evil Koran formula (slavery-rapetivism-apostasy ban) doesn't allow any other faith or faithlessness. From there Islamofascism was spread by Arabic slave hunters/traders aided by the Koran.

Koranic infidel-racism/sexism may be a brilliant idea as long as you don't prescribe to negative human rights. Everyone finds a reason to despise someone or some groups (and if you aren't white you can always spit on them, can't you). Islam utilizes this in an evil system without return (originally meant to defend slavery). So let's skip Islam alltogether, we who understand that an Islamic earth and hell are synonymous. Not only because they are both imaginary but more importantly because freedom is the oxygen of the cultural world!

Islamofascists are all those who consciously hide and seek strength behind bin Laden & Co's terror whereas those who are plain ignorant about what Islam stands for but still support it are in urgent need of education (as far from imams as possible).

* i.e. getting tempered or aroused against one's will as indicated by the lost Swedish homegrown Islamofascist and misogynist state-imam, Saudi Wahhabi/Salafist-inspired Leif Karlsson (alias "Abd-al-Haqq-Kielan"). Contrary to this my possible arousal isn't triggered by any feamle ass (although they might look good), no matter covered or not, as long as I don't trigger myself to be aroused. That's the difference between unhealthy sex segregated rapetivism and evolutionary implanted potential for heterosexual attraction!
Islam doesn't only support slavery but was itself, from start, the very essence of slavery. To understand the origin of Islam as Koranic slavery one has to understand the pre-Islamic trade routes going through the Arabian peninsula.

Victor A. Gunasekara: "Muslims conducted organised raids into Africa to enslave Negroes. These were then sold in the slave bazaars of Mecca, Baghdad, Tripoli and other places in the Islamic world. This trade was only stopped by the European powers in the nineteenth century."

Islam, (born out of individual and social orphanage) is the cradle of pan-Arabism and the root cause of not only Euro/American slave trade and colonialism, but also the "allergic reaction" that forced Europe into a technological revolution (compare Japan and the Meji-restauration in the 19th century).

Islam/Arabic language emerged among "desert vikings" (robbers and traders) who created a pan-Arabic "offensive defense" (i.e. what later became called Islam in the 19th century) based on slavery, colonialism and exploitation. Sex segregation/rapetivism, i.e. the institutionalized cultural Sharia confinement of females as biological and cultural reproducers of new muslims became an essential part of Islam's expansion.

Lonely Jihadist monsters and Islam influenced "paramilitary" youth gangs

In Demand for Resources (1992) I described the crucial cultural breach that may occur between parents and a child when the latter enters its educational/professional (or delinquent) path. Islamic jihadists (hard and soft) are those very same loners (albeit often superficially social) described as Homo Filius Nullius, decapitated by modernity (compare P. Klevius' article: Was Jesus religious? and the last scream of Jesus on the cross).

The Vagina Gate in the Atom of Kinship
Marriage, Kinship and Friendship
Heterosexual attraction, kinship and friendship
From Freud to bin Ladin
What's true Islam?
Also contains edited excerpts from Klevius' Human Rights and Interdisciplinary News:
For links to non-Klevius quotes, please enter the original blog.

Who's the real terrorist (totalitarian fascist) and who's the true Islamic Muslim? If you oppose totalitarian movements you also have to oppose Islam, the ultimate submission under arbitrary (i.e. depending on the interpretor) human totalitarianism! Islam cannot be "reformed" in a non-totalitarian/non-fascist way without loosing its "infidel" essence, i.e. the truly racist idea that a Muslim is a better person than a non-Muslim/non-believer. Islamic terror hence is three-dimensional: 1) Conventional terror, 2) daily global street, school etc. terror, and 3) the "moderate" totalitarian "white-collar" racist/sexist Sharia-terror spreading through mosques, sponsored organizations, universities etc (see KLEVUX and Negative Human Rights)!

"Islam is not just a religion. It is a way of life," insists a young and zealous black American convert initially drawn to Islam by admiration for Malcolm X. "It's specific in the Koran that jihad is about fighting. Kelly: There is no such thing as innocents. The idea of the Islamic state is terror against anyone who doesn't support Islamic ideology."
Klevius' comment: These are the Islamic voices Swedish state Islamist* Leif Karlsson/"Abd al Haqq Kielan" doesn't consider as belonging to Islam, according to a statement today on the Swedish (Islamic?) state radio. He also denies having noticed these kind of people in the Swedish mosques etc, although these are probably some of the most common visitors! This can only be interpreted as that he is still tied to the "true Islam" although he acts "blind". And by the way, although Hitler used to shout, a low, timid voice is no guaranteee against dangerous, totalitarian and sexist thoughts...!

* Sayyid Qutb (Muslim Brotherhood) who is considered the main Sunni Islamist, was so shocked by the freedom given to women he saw during his studies in the US, that he made this fight his conservative framework. Just as Leif Karlsson who has openly rejected freedom for women (see link below)! Sayyid Qutb's brother Mohammad, by the way, educated Osama bin Laden!

For more on the "moderate" Swedish state Islamist Leif "Abd al Haqq Kielan" Karslsson and his confused "Islam" (but clear and pronounced misogyny/sexism) see May 24, 2005, posting.

Klevius hypothesis on the origin of Islam and why/how it's inevitably tied to those "fanatic jihadists" who allegedly "pervert religion to further a radical cause"

A basic understanding of the crucial concept sex segregation is needed for understanding Islam. It's also important to keep in mind that true Islam is not represented by those "peaceful Muslims" who really don't care that much about religion but out of social conveniance (and perhaps aided by Islam's rigid attitude towards apostasy) just continue to "submit" to a "religion" (Islam is not a religion because god is effectively cut off from it) that espouses racist (infidel) and sexist (sex segregation, Sharia etc) bigotry, intolerance and hate (see Koran). In conclusion one may argue that the closer to Koranic Islam/true Muslimhood/Mohammedanism a person gets, the more radical he becomes per definition. Furthermore, Islam's ties to fundamentalists go two ways: 1) it applauses jihadists who "defend" it and 2) alleges to have been hijacked by those very same jihadists!

It's a real shame in the 21st century that an ideology born out of the practise of slavery  (first Islamic slaves were poor Arabic nomads), based on and supporting slavery/Islamic "serfdom"/rapetivism etc., is not forbidden throughout the world! And it's a shame that people seemingly can't read the Islamic slave/POW/rapetivism manual:

Koran 33:50: "Prophet, We have made lawful to you the wives to whom you have granted dowries and the slave girls whom God has given you as booty"

23:5: "... except with their wives and slave girls, for these are lawful to them:..."

And Islam never freed slaves, only confined them in itself. That's why apostasy was made such a grave crime. Arabic Islamists collected slaves by raids, trading etc. and were especially interested in girls. They turned most of Africa and huge parts of SE-Asia into Islamic rape harems for the sexual satisfaction of males and for ideological reproduction of Islam.

Arab slave traders used camels for transportation and Koran as the manual for institutionalizing slavery and rapetivism. Without the oil demand created by Western technology Islam would still rely entirely on slavery/rapetivism because Islam can't produce (only misuse) anyhthing by itself due to its main isea of sponging on others!

The numbers of slaves are unknown and usually belittled although we know they were high, possibly even extremely high. But the crucial issue here is the detrimental effect Islam had not only on Africa's overall development, but also on how Islam created evil cultural patterns visible even in non-Muslim countries.

African slaves taken by Arabic/Islamic traders and warriors usually ended up (if they were lucky) as servants and sex slaves (remember that Islamic Sharia marriage is institutionalized rape).

Slaves were kidnapped by black slave dealers who sold them to Arabs in an early Islamic banking and finance system.

As a paralell to slave trading via Darfur, Mecca etc. more than thousand years ago, Arabic/Islamic slave traders also begun using transportation by sea to, for example, East-India etc. Bigger ships and a huge demand for slave on plantations meant that Arabic/Islamic slavery reached its peak some 500 years before the Europeans begun buying black slaves from Arabs or Islam influenced slave distributors in Africa.

Great Zimbabwe and other slave centers were born, flourished, and declined in exact correspondence with the Arabic/Islamic slave trade. Furthermore, the Islamic drainage of African outcasts (compare Homo Filius Nullius) may have strongly contributed to the fact that tribal systems and religions have, in general, survived better in Africa than elsewhere, due to the "cleansing" effect of selling unwanted humans as slaves.

Interestingly Koran seems to have been compiled as a response and a strategy to the Nubian resistance. I.e. the sophistication of a combined conquest/slavery/rapetivism system that made it possible to turn male POWs/slaves into lojal soldiers, and females into reproducers of new Muslims - hence the harshness of Sharia.

The whole world is now suffering under the last convulsions of sex segregation, and Islam is definetly not the road out of sex apartheid. Islam IS sex segregation

But the birth of Islam without slavery is as impossible as is the modern spreading of Islam without oil money. And so is a 800 m high oil-dillo now planned in Arab land. But what do people really know about Islam? Except for the confusing veil of mist spread by Islamists themselves? The only thing we hear is the continuing repetition that "it's not Islam's fault". Well, it is!
Islam from desertization to global climate change
Islam was literally born out of that very environmental disaster that its nomadic predecessors had caused. And now the worst (slavery/rapetivism/suffering etc) "religion" has a direct and causal relation to the worst environmental issue of our time Islam's inherent incompetency for progress is today complemented by precisely what Islam couldn't perform, namely technology. The use of oil hence fuels our modern disaster in a way similar to the ancient cirdumstances where Islam launched its malign and contagious spreading.

Without slaves, oil, robbery, theft, sponging and copying, Islam has no built-in mechanism for progress! Read history with Islam as an analytical tool, and you will see a pattern that reveals an alternative picture of Europe's progress and Africa's stagnation, than those racist ones spread in the 19th and early 20th centuries.

It's not necessarily non-Muslims, but rather the Muslims who need to learn more about Islam! If they have to escape Islam, why then do they take it with them? Of course because everyone says: "It's not Islam that is bad"!

Other religions may make a big mistake in trying to sponge on Islam!

Karen Armstrong (the confused female who first became a nun) says that "the point is to separate out the extremists we have in all of our monotheistic religions from the mainstream”

In fact, she hence offers euthanasia for Islam. And that's good although she could have expressed it more clearly so to shorten the transition from Islam to non-Islam (real Islam only containing lunatic fractions like bin Laden & Co etc) and hence also the unnecessary suffering caused by Koran-Islam. Or doesn't she understand the simple fact that that 1) Islam is a very special form of monotheism (i.e. its pathological symbiosis with Koran that encompasses everyone who may be titled a Muslim - not only a fraction!), 2) that monotheism (outside ancestor warship/tribal/kinship religions - see Vagina gate) only can exist as individual or totalitarian, nothing in between. Moderate/modern Islam is a tautology because it presumes a non-existing Islam with only a name. Islam is incompatible with uncertainty (see Klevius definition of religion) and it's incompatible with de-sex segregation! To understand this you must understand the roots of Islam:
Islam today - Islam's new conquest follows old concepts
Today in Europe's capital the most common name among newborn boys is Mohammed!
Rotterdam, Antwerpen and other big cities are already on the verge to get Muslim majorities.
15 % of France's (nuclear) military force is Muslim.
Some 20 % of newborn Europeans are Muslims (see abt rape factories on links below).

Police avoid Islamic neighborhoods, and non-Muslim (and surprisingly often Muslim) girls/women are assaulted and raped by gangs of sexist Islamists just because of being infidels or not Muslim enough, or for violating Muslim dress codes and failing to submit to Islamic/Koranic sex segregatio - see Klevius definition of.

When Murray Gordon published his popular book Slavery in the Arab World (1987), he missed the world's largest Islamic country, Indonesia. But he isn't certainly the only one (info & interest have been limited, so far), and at least he tried to address the sensitive issue of Mohammed/Koran/Islam´s relation to slavery.

Aceh was the first Arabic/Islamic slave sultanate in SE Asia, and already some 100 years after Mohammed's death Arab slave traders had positioned a stronghold for themselves there.
Klevius hypothesis abt pan-Arabic Islam: It's already proved beyond doubt that pan-Arabic Islam is the world's main slave trader throughout history. And it's also proved that Mecca was the center of slave trade. Islamic pilgrimage was simply and mainly about selling and buying slaves. But little has been said abt Islam and Arabic slave trade in SE Asia.

Throughout Mideast, Africa and large parts of Asia and Europe the old custom of slavery was transformed by Islam, from being mainly a sex and labor resource, to a multidimensional institution aiming for the total submission of conquered people. As you may already know, Koran sets a double standard on slaves, they may be both things and individuals. This has to do with the birth of Islam as a "religion" for prospering on the behalf of abducted people. By forcing them to submit under Islam they became easier to handle while still keeping them in a slave position. Typically males were either castrated or used as soldiers etc and girls were turned into Muslim-producing factories in well guarded harems.

If this is really the simple (but pragmatically convincing) logic behind the development of Islam, then Indonesia and other places shouldn't be different. Arab slave traders used the old trade routes and started "slavery metastases" far from home. These metastases followed the wellknown pattern we have seen in Africa etc, namely that Arabs first dealt with and converted to Islam (when not simply conquering) those who already were in the business. Converted here means that they offered a manual for prospering on slaves, i.e. Koran and Islam, hence still under Arab influence. This is the background of pan-Arabic Islamism and this would explain Islam's tremendous growth and power along the old trade routes far from Mecca (originally an important waterhole for bypassers) , towards which they then had to bow. Arabs were neither good soldiers nor good producers of goods or farmers! But they invented what is perhaps the worst crime ever aginst humanity. 1400 years of cruel slavery and rapetivism. And one of the grim consequences is that this slavery many times got confused with ethnicity hence encouraging even more of the same. The key to survival under Arab influence was submission, indeed! This is also why Islam's most basic pillar is sex segregation - the biological and cultural reproduction of Islam!

"Moderate" Islam is nothing but an effort in vain to distance oneself from pan-Arabic fundamentalism. Yes, it might hurt, but I myself abandoned Christianity at age 14 when pushed to a church (no, I'm not a Marxist or socialist). Though, I had to wait until I turned 18 before I could officially get rid of Christianity that had been forced upon me! Also compare Islam in Afganistan today - a man facing death penalty for abandoning Islam! And the pan-Arabic Islam slavery is still on.

But although MuslimWakeUp announces that:
"One of the most tragic facts is that Mecca, the geographic heart of the Muslim community, was one of the largest slave markets in the Muslim world all the way up until the Twentieth Century when the standards of the international community, championed by the West, came to inform Muslims that chattel slavery is a violation against dignity, humanity and their own standing in global affairs."
the terrible truth is that it's not the culture but Islam itself that is the real culprit!
Sadly, it's become a fashion (or maybe rather a mechanism of defense) among Westernized "Muslims" to "reveal" Islamic atrocities, while continuing on the evil path with an own private agenda for "peace".

Islam IS segregation and totalitarianism - all in one and nothing in between!
A transition from kinship to kingship that went awfully wrong!

Some Islam etymology: Islam originally meant an Arabic male desert warrior/robberer/rapeist (pre-Islamic Arab nomads' ultra-sexism is wellknown among historians), and Allah was one oout of 360 pre-Islamic gods (see Klevius Definition of religion and Klevius Vagina gate in the atom of kinship).

In Germany Koran is now reported to the police. That means a first small step for mankind against a giant pan-Arabic/Islamic 1400 year long crime against humanity.
Historical background
A pagan moongod made "monolitheistic" (Monolitheism is a new word proposed by Klevius 2005), "connected" to Abraham (inspired by what was learned from educated Jews in Medina), and made popular by robbing caravans in transit between Mediterranean and South Asia!

Certainly it wasn't the timid hanifiyya tradition that was so successful in killing, raping and subjugating neighbours, hence spreading the "true Islam". Islam's birth (with the help of a woman who got her fortune in pre-Islamic time!) was a very late (and purhaps therefore especially evil) instance of the usual transition from kinship to kingship (compare Buddha, Confutse etc more than 1000 years earlier). And, later, it was precisely during the "peaceful" so called "Golden Age" that Islam lost its potency and eventually had to retreat from Europe. Today Islam's main weapon has been oil-money serving pan-Arabism. Without that money that the West dug up from the sand that the Saudis' nomadic ancestors deserted, Islam would hardly be noticed anymore (especially not by American youth who got Islam via oil-sponsored youth- etc organizations)! Arabs have, through the times, been remarcably incompetent in technology and technics (compare Shinto meets.Islam).
The long and stuttering birth of Islam - and its explosive and violent spreading
By the way, doesn't Medina belong to the Jews as much as Jerusalem belongs to the Palestinians - the "world's youngest people"? The creation of the Koran is historically very pragmatic, and deeply influenced by the Jews who inhabited Medina at the time before they were eventually expelled/killed when the Islamists became powerful enough.

The creation of Islam wasn't a sudden revelation but, on the contrary, an endless development from the moment (610) Mohammad (Islam's penultimate messenger before Bahaullah) realized that his tribe was about to die, to his own death in 632. He was educated by Jews, which led him to the ridicilous idea to "connect" Arabs with Abraham. Furthermore the Koran wasn't anything new but on the contrary mostly repetitions of already established traditions, spiced with alleged connections to Jewish ancestors, and the above purpose (jihad), which, due to its violent and aggressive totalitarian nature, became successful in conquest and subjugation (Islam has never really lived in real peace with anyone weaker than itself. Sometimes in commercial/political terror-balance, but that's about all. Islam is like a net with the spider waiting for the big meal).

A book, "thought" about for some 22-23 years, and written down, long after its (oral) "author's" death, by the help of a Khalif who was eventually murdered by other Islamists!

It's easy to imagine a tribal leader who, for the last 23 years of his life, exercises and experiences negative and positive outcomes of different strategies, and little by little (aided by the educated Jews) writes them down in what could be described a primitive "supreme court" diary dictated by the dictator himself. This also explains the scattered and inconsistent content of the Koran. And just like the Nazi (National Socialist) party program it also contained some good things (National Socialism is a branch of Socialdemoocracy, and its program is, in fact, hard to distinguish from a socialdemocratic party program, given Jews and racism are excluded). But that has hardly been used as a defense for Hitler, has it?

The real strength of Islam was its violence (and now also its racist and sexist message distributed by Saudi oil-money fueling Pan-Arabism. The "true" Islam is Arabic!). Without the rapid and bloody militaristic spreading/conquest in the second half of the 7th century (and early 8th) Islam should never have become a religious issue worth even mentioning! Not to admit this simple fact (which the American youth above clearly understood) is pure hypocrisy and suspicious stealthy acting!

Everyone who knows the essentials of Islam without critisizing it, is either a sexist/racist totalitarian fascist, or just a creepy, hypocritical coward. And it's certainly not about robbing someone's ethnicity, but, on the contrary, to disconnect true ethnicity from true evilness by openly condemning the basic teaching of Islam ("infidels" and non-Muslims as less worthy non-humans - see Klevius' Fundamentalist test) and Klevius' Definition of religion!
Islam's slave trade in Aceh/Indonesia etc.
When Murray Gordon published his popular book Slavery in the Arab World (1987), he missed the world's largest Islamic country, Indonesia. But he isn't certainly the only one (info & interest have been limited, so far), and at least he tried to address the sensitive issue of Mohammed/Koran/Islam´s relation to slavery. Freedom of religion means that you may have your personal god but nothing else. You may even do this in a group as long as this group isn't defined in totalitarian terms. On a more philosophical level it's noteworthy that a god outside the world is equally meaningless as a god all over the world.

Helen E. Hagan, anthropologist: "It is known that the caste system existing in that area is not so much directly related to the caravan trade as it is to the importation on an ideology – Islam. I would like to recapitulate briefly some of the important facts of this historical development. - The first policy of Arabs, as clearly established by historical documentation, was to tax the inhabitants of these regions with such heavy war taxes that the sale of Berber women and children was included in their treaties"

Aceh was the first Arabic/Islamic slave sultanate in SE Asia, and already some 100 years after Mohammed's death Arab slave traders had positioned a stronghold for themselves there. The special types of winds in the Indian ocean made it convenient to travel between the Horn of Africa/Arab peninsula to Aceh in whatb is today called Indonesia.

Chinese chronicles from the sixth century (i.e.before Islam) mention a Buddhist kingdom called Po-Li on the northern tip of Sumatra. This was replaced by Islamic slave traders in 674 CE.
Islam's slave trade with the Vikings: "Muslims wanted slaves to make their lives easier"
see Origin of Vikings above

"Moral wasteland of Scandinavia: The sudden irruption (of Viking slave traders) was no accident. It coincided with the devastation of Western Europe by the Islamic hordes coming out of the Middle East The Muslims wanted slaves to make their lives easier"

Klevius comment: Arabs preferred white women so that's why they paid so much more for them. Islam's expansion was entirely based on slavery and exploitation, and the so called "peaceful Andalucian co-existence" with Jews, Christians etc was upheld by a slave-economy draining Africa and Europe.

The more you study Islam (from outside the mosques and scientifically) the more disgusting it appears. Is Islam the worst crime ever against humanity? What differed the Vikings from the Muslims was Islam - a fascist recipe for conquest based on institutionalized rape and sex segregation!
Islam's genocide attempt and enslavement of the Romas
The Roma ancestors in India were enslaved and deported by Islam some thousand years ago. One of the worst Islamic slave raiders/traders, when it comes to Romas, being Mahmoud of Ghazna. But although this part of the Roma history is the most important one it is less known/talked about. Why is that? The stupid but widespread blinking of what Islam really stands for!
The deceptive illusion/projection of "a nice Islam"
In Karen Armstrong's The History of God (1993 - the same year World Trade Center got its first Islamic terror attack!) nothing at all is said about the violent spreading and nature of Islam (see battle/conquest timeline), although she spends 40 pages praising Mohammad and the Koran! This continuing tunnel vision is very typical for our time! Especially many women seem to appreciate the in-built sexism in Islam, perhaps because it offers a convenient excuse for not daring to really step outside (allow others to step outside)a limiting sex segregation. But perhaps the most dangerous deception is how Islam/Islamists, with clear or sometimes less clearly pronounced totalitarian objectives, now abuse naive Christian confidingness.

"...the kind of folly we now see in Iraq, which is based entirely on the premise that the problem is not Islam, but only "Wahhabi" Islam..."

"...there is an intensive effort by American Muslims to recruit in public schools, which is going pretty much unchecked in the name of tolerance..."

Grave Islamic indoctrination in Californian etc. schools
Who's a "true" Arab?
The Swedish (Islamic?) state radio invited Hans Rosling (allegedly "professor in international health"). He served the listeners with senseless and less than poorly informed pseudo-anthropology (hopefully he is better off in medicine). But what really struck me was that he called the first humans out of Africa "Arabs" just because they (the "Pygmies" belonging to the M130 lineage?!) happened to cross the levant and/or the southernnmost part of what we now call the Arabian peninsula, i.e. outside Saudi Arabia. And because of Arab-Islamic religious restrictions we don't know almost anything about the human remains on the peninsula from this period.

I do know many Arabs who aren't neither "Pygmies" nor Muslims. Or aren't they Arabs anymore? Just happened to be born there! Or maybe we all should become "Islamarabs" just like Leif Karlsson (alias Kielan) & Co! Reminds me of what I have read about "infidels" in Hitler's Germany and Stalin's Sovjet Union, not tp mention Pol Pot and others.

Arabs and Arabic are very late phenomenons and the latter, in its written form, contemporary with the birth of Islam (a variant of the Arabs' original religion, Muruwa (i.e. extreme machismo and brutal manliness, even for its time). Arabic is a late branch of Hebrew and the Aramaic language of Jesus.

There are also some speculations about a possible connection between arab, erebu (also connected to the death myth of Hades) and Europe (Assyrian darkness).

Unfortunately Islamic revisionism has replaced scientific truth about the "Arabs".
(Also compare the Indonesian case of "Muslim crypto-creationist "scientist" who stole (and possibly also destroyed vital parts of Flores 'Hobbit' WoMan").

"The crux of the problem with the Arabs which is mostly due to Islam, is that they haven't grown up"
Who are the Muslims and what is political Islam?

A one billion plus "minority"!

There aren't "1,1 billion Muslims". In fact, there are none*! Only a looming & anti-democratic/anti-human rights pan-Arabic**/Islamic sexist loophole!   There used to be some 2-3 billion communists. Most people now consider their worldview more or less extreme. But where are the communists today?

And whereas communism's milder relative, social demcracy, may be described as a democracy-sponging fascism/national socialism without weapons, Islam is ALL OF THEM! It sponges on democracy, it abuses human rights, and it keeps its weapons and sexist/totalitarian objectives!

"Lenin's What Is To Be Done?, when it was first published in 1902, was accepted by leading Russian social democrats"

It's also no coincidence that Hitler's NSDAP (National Socialist German Workers Party) supplanted the Social Democrats asas the largest party in the Reichstag in the democratic election of 1932!

A system of moral based on negative human rights or fascism? Political Islam, a much meaner relative to parasitic (i e transition of tax money to itself and its own bureacracy rather to the people) social democracy (see Angels of Antichrist - kinship vs. social state) is today the main threat against democracy. Sadly, democrats seem to bother the least!

Not all of Christianity is fundamentalist, but all of Islam is!

According to a study on the texts of ten main religions the Koran (the book of the "peaceful" Islam) is by far the most warlike and violent, whereas Buddhist (remember the huge, unique Buddha statues the Islamists destroyed in Afganistan before Bush liberated the country!) texts are by far the most peaceful. The New Testament came second. The Old Testament, although not even close to the Koran, contains some violence, but remember it's also more than 1000 years older! Furthermore, the Koran doesn't even try to problematize its abundance of and encouragement to violence!

But what is perhaps most astonishing with Islam is that many (and some of them people who otherwise don't use to have problem with reason) seem to defend its extreme sex segregation/sexism by referring to conditions that "used to be even worse"!
The evasions abt Islam are seemingly endless and widely accepted no matter how cracked they are. A fanatic and dangerous wish to blink obvious facts! A wish for a pesonal loophole, that's stronger than the fear of violent and totalitarian fascist ideologies?

From Stalin and the killing fields of Pol Pot to Islamic dictatorship and Arabic racism and the systematic killing and raping in Sudan/Darfur (silenced and belittled by the Bush-condemners who simultaneously support Islam)! Do we ever learn?

Note! To be non-religious or atheist has nothing to do with communism etc. Or the other way round: A true commitment to the Holy negative human rights is a road to a non-totalitarian/non-fascist/non-racist/non-sexist ideological approach between global humans. It's a myth that we need rigid religious systems for upholding moral, law and order. Look around and you will in fact be proven the contrary (see World Values Survey & A formula for a world "religion" based on negative human rights and true attachment)!

It's, in, fact, precisely the black "moral loopholes" in Islam that makes it equally attractive as the German national-socialist working party (a branch of German social democracy) fascism in the 1930's. Whereas negative human rights "only" offer a universal logic for coping with everyone, Islam offers (apart from its main task as pan_Arabism) a variety of possibilities for hatred, contempt and separatism, confined in a repressive and rigid set of rules etc, which, furthermore, are not only open, but encouraged to violence on different levels.

Real attachment or evil gang/group superficiality (sometimes confusingly like ethnicity)?

What is needed on top of the idea of negative human rights is true attachment between kins and friends instead of the superficial gang/member/group-"attachment" offered by suspicious religious and other systems of belief.

Weird children/youngsters who have been raised/fostered by their alikes constitute a fast growing criminal problem for the world. But why are they detached from the rest of us? Because they want to? I don't think so. I think they need both, all the time. And if someone has to go sometimes, it should rather be the weirdies, shouldn't it? But today the reality is almost always the opposite (read more abt attachment, delinquency and sex segregation on Childless child psychoanalysts in search for motherhood/femininity!

Looking for extremism in Islam? Stop looking. Just read the extreme hatred, contempt and sexism in the Koran, and consider that it's supposed to be the true heart of this "religion" And consider that Islam's ultimate and totalitarian/sexist/racist goals, Sharia and world hegemony, are wowen into a pattern that makes it much more like fascist "world-communism" than you might expect (And please, don't seek comfort in twisted Andalucian myths abt "the good Islam" - it's no different than the myths abt "the good communist paradise"!)! In fact, it's only its hereto failure for hegemony that disguises its real danger! Isn´t that enough extremism for a warning lamp to lit? But some might argue that one should try to "interprete" away those evil parts of the Koran. Well, I for one, think it's easier to "interprete" away Islam as a whole as long as it contains the Koran, and as long as this Koran is tied to this "religion" in a way that makes bin Laden's reading of it equally possible as someone else, just as we used to do with the extreme Utopia of a communist society. No one knows what is "true Islam", no more than what was "true communism" (Pol Pot?). But what we do know is that Islam is full of possibilities and scary openings (incl the eager supply of Arab oil-money) for weirdies on all levels! Do we really need to give this faceless and irresponsible ideology, full of evil potential, even the slightest chance? Most other ways of fighting poverty and inequality are probably preferable. Let's start with fair tax/citizen salary/health/education/housing insurance for everyone everywhere. A huge opportunity for UN - if we could only get rid of those anti-democratic Islamic states promoting genocide, rapes etc while hindering real democratic development within the UN!

One of the world's foremost "moderate Muslims" now seems to be king Abdullah of Jordan. Why? Because most Islamists have already realized that lunatic terrorism has become a stupid dead end, and because "moderate Islam" is (like Islam in all forms) essentially a slogan for gaininng power. Furthermore it's Islam's total lack of religious authority and responsibility that gives it its real, contourless power, but also its racist/sexist/fascist appearances! This means that while many talk in the name of Islam or name their particular ethnicity Muslim, the only thing they really have in common is that they boost Pan-Arabic Islam (which, in turn, is equally diversified and split)! And much of the sexist/racist(infidels, unbelievers etc)/totalitarian texts in Koran can never be reconciled with negative human rights, de-sex segregation and real democracy, no matter how far the interpretations are stretched.

Persian Mirror: Human rights before Islam and Cultural Genocide in the name of Islam

Guardian: "Defying the view that one man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter, Rice said, ``No cause, no movement, and no grievance can justify the intentional killing of innocent civilians and noncombatants.'' She added, ``This is unacceptable by any moral standard.'' "

Klevius comment: Except one - the Koran, the main tool for pan-Arabism since the 7th century (back then with swords and robberies - now with oil money, mosques, youth organizations, and Koran schools disguised as schools)! Totalitarian and anti-democratic texts that would be immediately forbidden if published by any other political actors! Also read abt the Islamists on Chatham House and Islam's real Achilles' heal - sex segregation, on Sex segregatioon Feminism and Religion

*For those in need of elucidation: According to Roger Scruton no one is really in charge for what a Muslim should do or be. Also see Religion of peace?

**Non-Arabic Islamic states may be historically compared to non-Roman Christian states.

Islam - the compilation (with the help of the Medina Jews*** that were later killed for not obeying the leaders of that very "Islam") - of totalitarian, sexist and racist ideas spiced with violent advices for how to kill, rape and humiliate "non-believers"/"infidels" - etymologically means, quite logically, "to surrender and obey". However, Islam as a name of an ideology based on a compilation of medieval ideas, is very recent.

*** Who told Mohammed (an orphan himself) abt Abraham's "illegitimate" son Ishmael ("an outcast," "whose hand is against every man, and every man's hand against him" in Gen. xvi.12). The Islamists then used Ishmael as a convenient way to link their new "religion" to the old Judeo/Christian tradition. For more on the topic see Homo Filius Nullius, Angels of Antichrist, Was Jesus religious? Demand for resources and other writings by Peter Klevius!

Today we may thank Bush, Condi, Blair, the Marines and all the others who have contributed to Afganistan's first, free, true election. But we may also consider the fact that the puzzling fact that oil-wealthy Arab nations gave much more aid to the Katrina victims in the US than to their own "Muslim" brothers and sisters in Íraq after the horrible bridge disaster recently. The number of victims was about the same! Could the promotion of pan-Arabic Islamism possibly be involved?

So who are the Muslims?
Why is Islam both sexist and racist?
Partly extracted and edited from Sex segregation, feminism and religion blog. For quote links please visit the blog.

The evil roots & nature of the real patriarchy, Islam, revealed in British survey
According to British YouGov's survey:

- one in four (abt half a million) British Muslims sympathises with motives of Islamic terrorists
- more than 100.000 British Muslims are ready to actually support Islamic terrorists
- about 16,000 British Muslims declare themselves willing, possibly even eager, to embrace Islamic violence (For the worldwide spreading of Islam, and to conquer the non-Islamic world?!).

"The responses indicate that Muslim men are more likely than Muslim women to be alienated from the mainstream and that the young are more likely to be similarly alienated than the old."

Interestingly it's also reported that some 80 per cent of the British Muslims think the UN sanctioned attack on the Islamic talibans and the hunt for Islamic terrorists in Afganistan also was an attack on Islam as a whole!

Klevius' comment: In many countries fascism and National Socialim are already long since forbidden as inhumane, anti-democratic and totalitarian. No matter if we read Hanna Arendt, the Koran, or different surveys, the emerging picture of Islam is at least equally totalitarian and anti-democratic in its ultimate and pronounced strive towards a world order where it constitutes "the only final ideology". But furthermore it also pronounces a rigid segregation betweeen the sexes (What is sex segregation?) that effectively outrules real emancipation. Although the free world now (the last decade) happens to be in the grip of a desperate sex-distinction (separatism) fashion, this isn't necessarily the situation for our kids or their kids. So why should we assist to lock them up by totalitarian, racist and sexist Sharia-Islam?! (Also see the Nazi/Arab connection on Klevius' definition of the holy (negative) human rights) and Klevius' definition of religion, which excludes Islam.

What should a "Muslim" do?

Very simple. Just clearly distance yourself from the totalitarian "infidel" propaganda in Islam! Openly admit that every non-Muslim is equal to every Muslim no matter of religious faith or lack of it (see Klevius' Fundamentalist test).

If you still think Islam has a case, you may read Klevius' approach on Ibn Khaldun and the production of luxuries (things and services) in Demand for Resources - on the tight to be poor (1992). The book was written with kind assistance and support from late George Henrik von Wright (Wittgenstein's successor at Cambridge).

Europe means "the land of sunset/darkness". So what if Islam isn't the resquer its clerics claim, but rather part of that very darkness?

Fascism, by the way, used to consider one class of individuals as superior to another based upon race, creed or origin! Also compare the Swedish state Islamist and misogynist, imam Leif Karlsson "Abd al Haqq Kielan" and his hypocrisy!
Background info on religion and sex segregation:
The Vagina Gate in the Atom of Kinship.

Saudi-British feminist-Islamist supports terror via British research institute
The problem isn't the immigrants, Arabs etc. THE PROBLEM IS ISLAM! Islam denies negative human rights (i.e. the most important ones). Don't let yourself be fooled by meaningless (or totalitarian, if you like) notions of "Islamic human rights"! Furthermore Islam, in all forms (incl. Muslim feminisms), is tied to a rigid sex segregation that makes real emancipation impossible

Islam's totalitarian racist/sexist/fascist "infidel" ideology (Koran) excludes every non-Moslem as being non-human and hence not protected by what Islam states about "real" humans. But, as is shown in Sudan and elsewhere, not even Muslims are safe from rapes, killings etc! And Muslim feminists in London, California etc shut their eyes!

Directory of "expertice" at the "non-political" Chatham House research center, Mai Yamani (Muslim feminist and the daughter of fired Saudi oil minister Yamani) shares the same goals as the London bombers: A hatred against king Fahd & Co, and against the US allies, and a fanatic urge to make Islam a totalitarian world ideology (as do Fahd & Co, but not Bush). No wonder then that her institute concludes that "the London bombings were caused by the Iraqi war" (read Bush!).

Interestingly Westernized Muslim feminists hence have a direct coupling to the Islamic terrorists and the continuing "Jihadist" spreading of Islam, albeit they prefer the Western style of living in front of extreme Wahhabism.

Barbara J. Stock: "...the line between a “moderate” Muslim and a terrorist is very, very thin. It seems with only a small dose of “True Islam” a peaceful Muslim can become a mass murderer". Klevius' comment: Moslem feminists certainly have a considerable share in this pattern. Furthermore one should note that Moslems consider Islam the only true religion of Abraham and that it was precisely the religious tie between Saudi Arabia and the US that in the 1950s constituted the oil-fueled united front against the Sovjet "Infidels"/unbelievers (see Klevius' Definition of Religion and Klevius' Definition of Feminism!

Klevius' definition of (negative) Human Rights + Fundamentalist test.

The meaningless Ijtihad (independent reasoning) reading of the Koran in new historical and social contexts is nothing but hidden private fundamentalism and has nothing to do with real emancipation, but everything with Islamic fascism/racism/sexism!

It's Islam (not Bush) that constitutes the real problem for millions of girls and women in the real world out there! And they are all traited by fanatic Islamists like, for example, Mai Yamani, who has chosen to use her fortune and Western education to empowering a fascist and repressive ideology! Also remember that most (open or stealthy) Islamic terrorists (except perhaps the suicide bombers whose lives they scrupulously abuse and waste) are wealthy and highly educated!

Who is Mai Yamani? A rootless and sex segregated female Islamist who can be described as the opposite to another religious woman, Condoleezza Rice.

She is a little sex segregated girl in Arab diaspora, living in a technological ivory tower (that her totalitarian fascism supporting Arab/Islamic ethnicity has been unable to produce itself) from where she now makes personal projections in the name of social science and Islam. But in doing so she also contributes to Islamic rapes etc on her sisters in Sudan and elsewhere. Ironically she hence boosts an Islamic ethnicity that she herself long since has lost in favour of Western ideals, whereas the women in Darfur have been forced into Islam and hence name their real ethnicity "Muslim"!

AMNESTY: systematic dehumanisation and assisted rapes of black women by Arab women
The secular end of Islam and the consecutive freeing of Arabs and Muslims
- Peter Klevius rereading of ibn Khaldun (1992)

According to the historian ibn Khaldun Arabs are the lowest of people. They "destroy and ruin everyting they conquer" and can only be ruled by "some religious  prophethood" etc. He also says that Arabs are the people most remote from monarchy. Well, what does Saudi Islamofascist oil-dictator king Abdullah think abt that?

In the text above lies the solution for those contaminated by Islam. be continued...

External links on the history of Mohammed and Islam:

"Like with Jesus, there are no reliable sources for the life of the Mohammed."

"The Muslim Qur'an is unique among all the sacred writings in the entire world -- because it alone counsels its followers to make war on unbelievers.

Read the true history of Islam and then look into your own heart to see if  you are missing something, or if you have been lied to regarding Islam itself.

No comments:

Post a Comment